You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
'd appreciate having your suggestions on the following case of scRNAseq analysis with LIGER /Seurat 3.1. ; the question is : what analysis strategy would you recommend (described below) ?
shall we have 4 batches of scRNA-seq data of these experiments :
WT_batch1, WT_batch2, A_batch1, A_batch2
WT_batch3, WT_batch4, B_batch3, B_batch4
what is the optimal way to analyze the data-sets ? Several analysis strategies are possible :
STRATEGY A.
to use CELLRANGER AGGR (with NORMALIZATION = TRUE) on :
WT_batch1, WT_batch2 : to produce WT_batch_1_2
A_batch1, A_batch2 : to produce A_batch_1_2
WT_batch3, WT_batch4 : to produce WT_batch_3_4
B_batch3, B_batch4 : to produce B_batch_3_4
and to follow the descriptions of SEURAT pipelines with LIGER, on WT_batch_1_2, WT_batch_3_4, A_batch_1_2, B_batch_3_4 :
to use SEURAT MERGE function in order to have all the raw data (WT_batch1, WT_batch2, A_batch1, A_batch2, WT_batch3, WT_batch4, B_batch3, B_batch4) in a large MATRIX
could I apply LIGER on all the experiments with those 2 replicates, and afterwards, how could I call the function FindMarkers in SEURAT (FindMarkers(object, ident.1, ident.2), in order to specify the REPLICATES in ident.1 and in ident.2 ?
Any other analysis strategy ? Any suggestions, comments would be very welcome ! Thanks a lot !
bogdan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear all,
'd appreciate having your suggestions on the following case of scRNAseq analysis with LIGER /Seurat 3.1. ; the question is : what analysis strategy would you recommend (described below) ?
shall we have 4 batches of scRNA-seq data of these experiments :
WT_batch1, WT_batch2, A_batch1, A_batch2
WT_batch3, WT_batch4, B_batch3, B_batch4
what is the optimal way to analyze the data-sets ? Several analysis strategies are possible :
STRATEGY A.
WT_batch1, WT_batch2 : to produce WT_batch_1_2
A_batch1, A_batch2 : to produce A_batch_1_2
WT_batch3, WT_batch4 : to produce WT_batch_3_4
B_batch3, B_batch4 : to produce B_batch_3_4
https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/satijalab/seurat.wrappers/blob/master/docs/liger.html
STRATEGY B.
to use SEURAT MERGE function in order to have all the raw data (WT_batch1, WT_batch2, A_batch1, A_batch2, WT_batch3, WT_batch4, B_batch3, B_batch4) in a large MATRIX
could I apply LIGER on all the experiments with those 2 replicates, and afterwards, how could I call the function FindMarkers in SEURAT (FindMarkers(object, ident.1, ident.2), in order to specify the REPLICATES in ident.1 and in ident.2 ?
Any other analysis strategy ? Any suggestions, comments would be very welcome ! Thanks a lot !
bogdan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: