You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using the FFT in various dimensions, however I have boilerplate code that is copied over for each dimension because the FFT classes (*_1D, *_2D, *_3D) don't have a common interface.
Could it be possible to add an interface (called, perhaps "FFT") that all FFT classes could implement, so as to give generic access to the 1D versions of the methods, i.e. {real|complex}{Forward|Inverse}({type}[] out) ?
If pull request needed, sure can do.
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm using the FFT in various dimensions, however I have boilerplate code that is copied over for each dimension because the FFT classes (
*_1D
,*_2D
,*_3D
) don't have a common interface.Could it be possible to add an interface (called, perhaps "FFT") that all FFT classes could implement, so as to give generic access to the 1D versions of the methods, i.e.
{real|complex}{Forward|Inverse}({type}[] out) ?
If pull request needed, sure can do.
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: