- What is the context?
- What is the problem?
- What has been done and/or how?
- What is the gap?
- What is the research objective?
- How will the objective be achieved (methodology, materials, tools, etc)?
- What was the result?
- What is the conclusion?
- Elaborate about the context, history, problem and why it is relevant.
- Elaborate about what has been done.
- Elaborate about the gaps.
- What is the research objective (primary and secondary) and why it is relevant for science?
- Elaborate about the methodology in a more abstract way than in its specific section.
- What is the structure of the document.
- Sistematic review of related literature up to the state of the art.
- Highlight advantages, disadvantages and gaps of current knowledge.
- What is the objective in more detail and how it fills the gap.
- Can the objective's results be verified?
- Justify how the results will be measured.
- What are the materials, procedures, tools, and technology that are used and why they were selected?
- How is the objective fulfilled (methods) and why choose this approach?
- How are the results/hipothesis tested and why it is the best choice?
- Indicate limitations and potential solutions to the methodology proposed.
- Describe the results and how they were achieved (proofs).
- Critique analysis of results and their evidences (simulations, observations, etc).
- Relate cause and effect, make generalizations through observations and analysis, explain contradictions, define limitations, suggest further research.
- Justify everything with evidence or logic.
- What were the main conclusion based on the results?
- What were the main contributions?
- What were the challenges, limitations, and contradictions?
- What are relevant future works?