-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathcshintro.tex
171 lines (149 loc) · 8.02 KB
/
cshintro.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
\documentclass[csh.tex]{subfiles}
\begin{document}
\section{Internal simplicial objects}
The \emph{ambient category} that provides the object and morphisms everything
in this paper is constructed of, is an elementary topos $\ambient$ with natural
number object $\nno$.
\begin{definition}
That $\ambient$ is an elementary \keyword{topos} means all of the following.
\begin{enumerate}
\item The category $\ambient$ is \emph{locally cartesian closed}. This means
that for each object $X$ of $\ambient$ each slice $\ambient/X$ is cartesian
closed.
\item The category $\ambient$ is \emph{extensive}, which means that is has
finite coproducts and that $\ambient/(X+Y)$ is equivalent to
$(\ambient/X)\times(\ambient/Y)$ for each pair of objects $X$ and $Y$ of
$\ambient$.
\item The category $\ambient$ is \emph{exact} in the sense of Barr. This
means that all pseudo-equivalence relations (see below) have coequalizers and
that those coequalizers are stable under pullback.
\item The category has a \emph{subobject classifier}, which is a monomorphism
$t\of 1\to \Omega$ such that every monomorphism $m\of X\to Y$ is a pullback of
$t$ along a unique morphism $\xi(m)\of Y\to \Omega$.
\end{enumerate}
A \keyword{pseudo-equivalence relation} consists of a pair of objects $X_0$,
$X_1$ and morphisms $r\of X_0\to X_1$ and $s,t\of X_1\to X_0$ such that
$s\circ r= t\circ r = \id_{X_0}$ and such that for each $x,y,z\of X_0$ if two
of $\tuplet{x,y}$, $\tuplet{x,z}$ and $\tuplet{y,z}$ are in the image of
$\function{x\of X_1}{\tuplet{s(x),t(x)}}\of X_1\to X_0\times X_0$, the third
is too. A \emph{coequalizer} for a pseudo-equivalence relation is a
coequalizer of $s$ and $t$.
\end{definition}
\begin{remark} A pseudo-equivalence relation is essentially a 1-dimensional
simplicial object. For that reason, the simplicial homotopy category doesn't
change if some pseudo-equivalence relation has no coequalizer. Together with
the subobject claissfier, exactness should play a minor role in the rest of
this paper.
\end{remark}
Inside $\ambient$ the most relevant structure are \emph{internal diagrams} and
their duals \emph{internal presheaves}. These structures replace functors
$\cat C\to \ambient$ and $\cat C\dual\to \ambient$ where $\cat C$ is a small
category in classical treatments.
\begin{definition}
For any category $\cat E$ with finite limits, an \keyword{internal category}
is a tuple
$\icat C = \tuplet{\Ob(\icat C),\Ar(\icat C),\dom_{\icat C},\cod_{\icat C},\id_{\icat C},\circ_{\icat C}}$
where $\Ob(\icat C)$ and $\Ar(\icat C)$ are objects of $\cat E$ and given that
$C_2 = \set{\tuplet{f\of \Ar(\icat C),g\of \Ar(\icat C)}| \dom(f) = \cod(g) }$:
\begin{align*}
\dom_{\icat C} \of \Ar(\icat C)&\to \Ob(\icat C) &
\cod_{\icat C} \of \Ar(\icat C) &\to \Ob(\icat C)\\
\id_{\icat C} \of \Ob(\icat C)&\to \Ar(\icat C)&
\circ_{\icat C} \of C_2&\to \Ar(\icat C)\\
\dom_{\icat C}\circ\id_{\icat C} &= \id_{\Ob(\icat C)}&
\cod_{\icat C}\circ\id_{\icat C} &= \id_{\Ob(\icat C)}\\
\dom_{\icat C}(f\circ_{\icat C} g) &= \dom_{\icat C}(g)&
\cod_{\icat C}(f\circ_{\icat C} g) &= \cod_{\icat C}(f)\\
\id_{\icat C}(\cod_{\icat C}(g))\circ_{\icat C} g &= g &
f\circ_{\icat C} \id_{\icat C}(\dom_{\icat C}(g)) &= f
\end{align*}
For $f\of X \to \Ob(\icat C)$, a \keyword{left action} of $\icat C$ is an
operator $\cdot\of Y \to X$ where \[Y = \set{\tuplet{g\of\Ar(\icat C),x\of X}|
\dom(g) = f(x)}\] such that:
\begin{align*}
\id_{\cat C}(f(x))\cdot x &= x &
g \cdot (h\cdot x) &= (g\circ h)\circ x
\end{align*}
Dually, a \keyword{right action} of $\icat C$ on $f$ is an
operator $\cdot\of Z \to X$ where \[Z = \set{\tuplet{x\of X,g\of\Ar(\icat C)}|
f(x) = \cod(g)}\] such that:
\begin{align*}
x\cdot\id_{\cat C}(f(x)) &= x &
(x\cdot g)\cdot h &= x\cdot(g\circ h)
\end{align*}
An \keyword{internal diagram} over $\icat C$ is the combination of an
$f\of X\to \Ob(\icat C)$ with a left action, while an \emph{internal presheaf}
over $\icat C$ is the combination of an $f\of X\to \Ob(\icat C)$ with a right
action. Finally, a \emph{morphism} of diagrams or presheaves is a morphism that
commutes with the actions on the appropriate sides.
\end{definition}
The simplicial objects of thsi paper in are internal presheaves over the
internal simplex category that can be fashioned from the natural number object.
\begin{definition} The internal category $\simCat$ satisfies
$\Ob(\simCat)=\nno$, $\Ar(\simCat)$ consist of non decreasing maps between
inhabited initial segments of $\nno$, domains, codomains, identities and
compositions all canonical.
The \emph{category of internal presheaves} over $\simCat$ is denoted by
$\ambient\s$.
\end{definition}
\begin{example} A simple kind of simplicial object is the \keyword{discrete}
simplicial object. There is one for each object $I$ of $\ambient$:
\[ I\disc = \tuplet{\nno\times I,\function{\tuplet{n,i}}n,\function{\tuplet{\tuplet{n,i},\phi}}i} \]
Note the $\function{x}{f(x)}$ notation for morphisms of $\ambient$ the paper
uses.
\end{example}
\begin{remark} Assume throughout this paper that all of the structure on
$\ambient$ comes from functors. Limits and exponentials come from right
adjoints to functors between categories related to $\ambient$ and colimits
come from left adjoints. This assumption ensures that many functors only
specified up to isomorphism can be constructed.
\end{remark}
\hide{We need to talk about density comonads here, because it is a condition on
$\ambient$.}
Besides simplicial object we will be interested in a internal diagram
with specific properties assumed to be part of $\ambient$.
\begin{definition}
%fully faithful
Let $\cdot$ be a left action on $f\of X\to \Ob(\icat C)$ for some internal
category $\icat C$. The left action $\cdot$ induces a map that shows how a
diagram is a kind of functor:
\[ \function g g\cdot\of\Ar(\icat C)\to\set{\tuplet{c,d,e}| c,d\of\Ob(\icat C), e\of X_c\to X_d} \]
A diagram is therefore \emph{full} if this map is an epimorphism,
\emph{faithful} if this map is a monomorphism and \emph{fully faithful} if it
is an isomorphism.
%dense
The \keyword{codensity monad} $M$ for a diagram $d\of D\to\Ob(\icat C)$ is the
left Kan extension of a diagram along itself.
\[M(X) = \colim_{D_c\to X} D_c\]
It gives a best approximation of an object of $\ambient$ in terms of the
fibres of the diagram. If $M$ is isomorphic to the identity functor, the
diagram $d$ is dense. %lot of handwaving, but how could this be misunderstood?
%filtered
A \emph{filtered category} is a category is a category in which every
finite diagram has a cocone. A \emph{filtered diagram} is a diagram over a
filtered category. Both notions have internal counterparts which I won't spell
out here.
\end{definition}
\begin{example} In any Grothendieck topos, there is a a fully faithful and dense
diagram that indexes the representable functors. Some conditions on the
underlying site that are always satisfied by the ones that come form
topological spaces ensure that this diagram is filtered.
\end{example}
\begin{remark} %make this something to point back to.
An important assumption we make about $\ambient$ is that it has a
dense filtered fully faithful internal diagram that contains all the objects
of non decreasing morphisms between inhabited initial sections of the natural
number objects. The diagram provides an initial alternative to smallness and
this extra condition will eventually ensure that the generic cofibrations have
`small' codomains.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark} The category of modest objects, or its ex/lex completion is not
assumed to take on the role of dense fully faithful filtered diagram in the
intended model, even though that would work. The modest sets are
interesting because of their completeness, which is an unrelated rarer
quality.
As the example shows, the diagram makes an elementary topos more like a
Grothendieck topos, but realizability toposes have other ways of meeting the
same condition.
\end{remark}
\end{document}