You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Your work in reimplementing regridding methods is interesting! I often find ESMF to be a bit heavy on dependencies side indeed. But one crucial feature that makes it better than xr.interp is that it computes weights first and then applies them in parallel for all spatial slices. This is a major dealbreaker when dealing with long timeseries! Do you have plans on implementing something like that in pure-xarray ?
It should be easy to compute weights and apply them, the same way that the conservative method currently does. This way we could possibly improve performance for long timeseries.
I don't think this is actually an issue due to the way interpolation is applied independently across the dimensions. In some quick benchmarks on a longer timeseries, regrid.linear is anywhere from 1.2x to 4x faster than regrid.conservative depending on the chunk scheme. So I doubt we would get any improvement by instead generating our own weights and doing .dot().
Plus its pretty cool that xarray_regrid/methods/interp.py is only 52 lines, most of which are type overloads 😄
Originally posted by @aulemahal in pangeo-data/xESMF#282 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: