You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the documentation, it is recommended to include outFilterMultimapNmax 1 parameter in STAR alignment to exclude non-unique alignments and reduce noise for downstream analyses.
In case of default outFilterMultimapNmax 10 setting, how does RiboCode handle non-unique alignments? Are they included in P-site estimating and ORF detection? Does RiboCode differentiate between primary and secondary alignment flags when dealing with multi-mapped reads?
Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
According to the documentation, it is recommended to include outFilterMultimapNmax 1 parameter in STAR alignment to exclude non-unique alignments and reduce noise for downstream analyses.
In case of default outFilterMultimapNmax 10 setting, how does RiboCode handle non-unique alignments? Are they included in P-site estimating and ORF detection? Does RiboCode differentiate between primary and secondary alignment flags when dealing with multi-mapped reads?
Thank you very much!
Hi! I confronted the error of "not unique alignment" when doing ORF counting. I think this error may induced by the outFilterMultimapNmax parameter setting in STAR alignment. Could you please provide the site of the documentation you mentioned related to recommendation of outFilterMultimapNmax 1 ?
Dear RiboCode developers,
According to the documentation, it is recommended to include outFilterMultimapNmax 1 parameter in STAR alignment to exclude non-unique alignments and reduce noise for downstream analyses.
In case of default outFilterMultimapNmax 10 setting, how does RiboCode handle non-unique alignments? Are they included in P-site estimating and ORF detection? Does RiboCode differentiate between primary and secondary alignment flags when dealing with multi-mapped reads?
Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: