-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvement #16
Comments
S+U GAN may make output more naturally. |
Is it even possible for this algorithm to achieve the same quality as the fast style transfer? |
A workaround I did was to add a SuperResolution pix2pix module on top of the output of the Decoder to try to map back to the original image. This was used in a recent paper we submitted to NIPS: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10041 |
Interesting, what would be the effect on the output from this? |
@ArturoDeza What were the results ? Do you have any pictures we can compare ? |
@Sugarbank @hristorv I still need to add the result of adding the SuperResolution module in the Supplementary Material for the ArXiv version 3. As of yesterday I added some extra images that the model produces on the updated ArXiv version (Version 2). I guess the Base_Line images (which use the super resolution module) in the paper are the closest approximation to the original. |
see the paper EFDM, I think its matching function or norm (in the context of adain) is quite same as HM |
Hello,
I am currently trying to improve AdaIN in a Tensorflow implementation. What do you think can be done to improve the algorithm? What can be done in order to have quality similar to this: https://github.com/lengstrom/fast-style-transfer
I am trying to implement as stated in the paper, histogram losses. I implemented method for histogram matching on 2 images, but i have no idea how to move on.
I need some ideas how to improve the algorithm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: