You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have some questions about ways to solve problems more efficiently.
I think your prototype implementation roughly includes 4 processes excluding a feature extractor and their respective computational costs for a single 640x480 image follow:
calculation of Laplacian matrix L from affinities (~1 sec)
calculation of eigenvectors of L (~ 1 min)
solving a constrained sparsification problem (~3 mins)
solving a relaxed sparsification problem (~30 secs)
By the way, you say in paper,
The efficiency of our method can be optimized in several ways, such as multi-scale solvers, but an efficient implementation of linear solvers and eigendecomposition lies beyond the scope of our paper.
There seems to be 3 ways to make the execution time shorter, multi-scale solver, more efficient linear solvers and eigendecomposition.
Questions:
However, which processes do they correspond to?
What is multi-scale solver?
Can I make the most heavy process (process 3) faster?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, @yaksoy
Thank you for your great paper!
I have some questions about ways to solve problems more efficiently.
I think your prototype implementation roughly includes 4 processes excluding a feature extractor and their respective computational costs for a single 640x480 image follow:
L
from affinities (~1 sec)L
(~ 1 min)By the way, you say in paper,
There seems to be 3 ways to make the execution time shorter, multi-scale solver, more efficient linear solvers and eigendecomposition.
Questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: