Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default workflow_executor to lattice-default executor #1972

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

cjao
Copy link
Contributor

@cjao cjao commented Nov 25, 2024

This should eliminate the need to set workflow_executor explicitly in many cases.

  • I have added the tests to cover my changes.
  • I have updated the documentation and CHANGELOG accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.

@cjao cjao requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2024 20:20
@cjao cjao requested review from wjcunningham7 and santoshkumarradha and removed request for wjcunningham7 November 25, 2024 20:25
This should eliminate the need to set workflow_executor explicitly in
many cases.
@cjao cjao force-pushed the optional-workflow-executor branch from 89ab6c3 to ebbf4e8 Compare January 22, 2025 19:07
@kessler-frost kessler-frost merged commit fb905f9 into develop Jan 23, 2025
14 checks passed
@kessler-frost kessler-frost deleted the optional-workflow-executor branch January 23, 2025 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants