-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] [FIX] #1499 Persistent Dtvcc
struct for CEA-708 decoding in Rust
#1501
Closed
ArchitBhonsle
wants to merge
10
commits into
CCExtractor:master
from
ArchitBhonsle:rust-persistent-dtvcc
+212
−50
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
395a873
Rewriting `Dtvcc::new()` to instantiate
ArchitBhonsle 5e72dff
Moving raw pointers to `Option`s and `Vec`s to arrays
ArchitBhonsle 9ff02b9
Questionable implementation of `ccxr_dtvcc_free`
ArchitBhonsle 7a0a2fd
Helpful comments
ArchitBhonsle 20271f6
Modifying `lib_cc_decode` (C) to use the new `Dtvcc` (Rust)
ArchitBhonsle 4b08981
Silencing clippy
ArchitBhonsle 44141b1
Setting the encoder from C
ArchitBhonsle 125e740
Storing pointers over references and `Box`ing the decoders
ArchitBhonsle e42fe35
Switching over the encoder assignment based on `DISABLE RUST`
ArchitBhonsle 22f5684
Exporting `ccxr_process_data` from Rust and using in `mp4.c`
ArchitBhonsle File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no longer a need to use bindings for any 708 related structs/enums, we can define them now in rust itself. We still need to use bindings for
encoder
,timing
andreport
. But all others should be defined in rust.This is going to be somewhat bigger and comprehensive change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should that be a separate PR since it seems to be independent of this one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be in this PR as I think it will allow you to remove the additional Boxing required here, and also will make the code more idiomatic rust as we can stop relying on the C bindings