Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates compute_angular_windspeeds to match new cyclostrophic argument approach #145

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

spjuhel
Copy link
Collaborator

@spjuhel spjuhel commented Sep 24, 2024

In CLIMADA-project/climada_python#936 we change the approach for the cyclostrophic argument (as suggested in CLIMADA-project/climada_python#897).

This patch updates the convention within petals for compatibility.

PR Author Checklist

PR Reviewer Checklist

@chahank
Copy link
Member

chahank commented Nov 21, 2024

I think the failing tests are not related to this PR right?

Can we merge?

@NicolasColombi NicolasColombi self-requested a review December 13, 2024 10:09
@NicolasColombi
Copy link
Collaborator

NicolasColombi commented Dec 13, 2024

I think the failing tests are not related to this PR right?

Can we merge?

Yes I would, it should fix the compatibility issues with petals that PR #936 created. I also do not think that the test are failing because of this.

@NicolasColombi NicolasColombi merged commit 307ef3b into develop Dec 13, 2024
2 of 10 checks passed
@NicolasColombi NicolasColombi deleted the feature/cyclostrophic-kwargs-update branch December 13, 2024 10:23
emanuel-schmid added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
…ophic-kwargs-update"

This reverts commit 307ef3b, reversing
changes made to 94f68ae.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants