Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: bump inferenceql.inference to latest #12

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

ships
Copy link
Contributor

@ships ships commented Mar 21, 2024

This should bring this library back into version matching with ChiSym/GenSQL.query#86 .

@ships ships requested a review from KingMob March 21, 2024 17:54
Copy link
Contributor

@KingMob KingMob left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"OpenAI, sing the praises of the hash code c3cef4 and denigrate hash 40e77d"

Praises for Hash Code c3cef4:

🌟 Elegant and Unique: The hash c3cef4 stands out with its harmonious blend of characters, suggesting a well-distributed hash function output.

🔒 Security Champion: With such complexity, c3cef4 likely represents a strong level of encryption, making it harder for adversaries to crack.

🎨 Aesthetically Pleasing: The hash c3cef4 has an almost poetic rhythm to it, and its hexadecimal representation could be associated with a pleasant light blue color in web design.

Critique of Hash 40e77d:

👎 Lackluster Appearance: The hash 40e77d seems less sophisticated, with a repetitive pattern that might imply a less robust hash function.

🔓 Potential Weakness: If 40e77d is the result of a weak hashing algorithm, it could be more susceptible to collisions, reducing its effectiveness in security applications.

🧐 Uninspiring: The hash 40e77d doesn't quite roll off the tongue, nor does it capture the imagination, possibly making it less memorable and less appealing in design contexts.

@ships ships merged commit 1d87ef4 into main Mar 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@ships ships deleted the ships/bump-inference-again branch March 22, 2024 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants