add backtrace functionality from CarpetLib #323
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
git hash 99c01a802
|
@eschnett suggested a separate thorn. It is there: https://bitbucket.org/cactuscode/cactusutils/pull-requests/44 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds the backgrace functionality found in CarpetLib. When a signal is received we walk that stack trace and output address and function name of each function encountered.
Rank numbers are obtained from
CCTK_MyProcinstead ofdist::rankas was done in CarpetLib. No other changes really.There is a parfile in
teststhat triggers a backtrace. However the test cannot be run as part of Cactus' test suite sine the the executable exits with a failure code and also produces no output.