-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
<Do not review> pim6d: few fixes #11714
Conversation
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6742/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9: No useful log foundFedora 29 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundSuccessful on other platforms/tests
|
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6931/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6940/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6980/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7083/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-TOPO3U18I386-7093/test Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3 Successful on other platforms/tests
|
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7140/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
|
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7141/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
|
cc463a5
to
fde1853
Compare
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7411/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
|
fde1853
to
04511c1
Compare
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7484/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings
|
04511c1
to
17109d2
Compare
Outdated results 🚧Basic BGPD CI results: Partial FAILURE, 2 tests failed
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7584/artifact/TOPO8U18ARM64/ErrorLog/ Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8: No useful log foundTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8: No useful log foundTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7584/artifact/TOPO8U18I386/ErrorLog/ Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8: No useful log foundTopotests debian 10 amd64 part 8: Failed (click for details)Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7584/artifact/TOPO8DEB10AMD64/ErrorLog/ Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8: No useful log foundSuccessful on other platforms/tests
Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7584/artifact/TOPO8U18ARM64/ErrorLog/ Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8: No useful log foundTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8: No useful log foundTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7584/artifact/TOPO8U18I386/ErrorLog/ Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8: No useful log foundTopotests debian 10 amd64 part 8: Failed (click for details)Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-7584/artifact/TOPO8DEB10AMD64/ErrorLog/ Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8: No useful log found
|
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1: No useful log foundSuccessful on other platforms/tests
Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1: No useful log found
|
ci:rerun |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDTest incomplete. See below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: IncompleteTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5: Incomplete(check logs for details)Successful on other platforms/tests
|
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
This PR is stale because it has been open 180 days with no activity. Comment or remove the |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-TOPO9DEB10AMD64-12606/test Topology Tests failed for Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9 Successful on other platforms/tests
|
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests debian 10 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-TOPO9DEB10AMD64-12610/test Topology Tests failed for Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9 Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-12610/artifact/TP1U1804AMD64/TopotestDetails/Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-TP1U1804AMD64-12610/test Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1 Successful on other platforms/tests
|
Problem Statement: =================== Syscall param sendmsg(msg.msg_iov[0]) points to uninitialised byte(s) at 0x4975157: sendmsg (sendmsg.c:28) ==2263111== by 0x1413BE: pim_msg_send_frame (pim_pim.c:629) ==2263111== by 0x1413BE: pim_msg_send (pim_pim.c:743) ==2263111== by 0x1425DC: pim_register_send (pim_register.c:332) ==2263111== by 0x1427EE: pim_null_register_send (pim_register.c:443) ==2263111== by 0x14D228: pim_upstream_register_stop_timer (pim_upstream.c:1608) ==2263111== by 0x48CE6DF: thread_call (thread.c:1693) ==2263111== by 0x4899EFF: frr_run (libfrr.c:1068) ==2263111== by 0x11D035: main (pim6_main.c:190) ==2263111== Address 0x1ffeffdcb1 is on thread 1's stack ==2263111== in frame #2, created by pim_register_send (pim_register.c:273) ==2263111== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==2263111== at 0x142690: pim_null_register_send (pim_register.c:389) RCA: ==================== 1. All members of struct pim_msg_header were not initiliased while sending null register packet. Therefore when the pointers are assigned while sending the msg via sendmsg, it complains the pointer points to uninitialised byte. 2. struct ipv6_ph ph was also not initialised. Fix: ==================== Initialised all the members using memset. Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <[email protected]>
Closing the PR since it is no more required. |
Trying to validate few things here.
Please ignore.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool [email protected]