Fix #3006

release-notes/VERSION-2.x

@@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ Project: jackson-databind
 === Releases === 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
+2.13.1 (not yet released)
+
+#3006: Argument type mismatch for `enum` with `@JsonCreator` that takes String,
+  gets JSON Number
+ (reported by GrozaAnton@github)
+
 2.13.0 (30-Sep-2021)
 
 #1850: `@JsonValue` with integer for enum does not deserialize correctly

src/main/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/deser/std/FactoryBasedEnumDeserializer.java

@@ -29,14 +29,15 @@ class FactoryBasedEnumDeserializer
 {
     private static final long serialVersionUID = 1;
 
-    // Marker type; null if String expected; otherwise numeric wrapper
+    // Marker type; null if String expected; otherwise usually numeric wrapper
     protected final JavaType _inputType;
-    protected final boolean _hasArgs;
     protected final AnnotatedMethod _factory;
     protected final JsonDeserializer<?> _deser;
     protected final ValueInstantiator _valueInstantiator;
     protected final SettableBeanProperty[] _creatorProps;
 
+    protected final boolean _hasArgs;
+
     /**
      * Lazily instantiated property-based creator.
      *
@@ -51,7 +52,8 @@ public FactoryBasedEnumDeserializer(Class<?> cls, AnnotatedMethod f, JavaType pa
         _factory = f;
         _hasArgs = true;
         // We'll skip case of `String`, as well as no type (zero-args): 
-        _inputType = paramType.hasRawClass(String.class) ? null : paramType;
+        _inputType = (paramType.hasRawClass(String.class) || paramType.hasRawClass(CharSequence.class))
+                ? null : paramType;
         _deser = null;
         _valueInstantiator = valueInstantiator;
         _creatorProps = creatorProps;
@@ -88,6 +90,9 @@ public JsonDeserializer<?> createContextual(DeserializationContext ctxt,
             BeanProperty property)
         throws JsonMappingException
     {
+        // So: no need to fetch if we had it; or if target is `String`(-like); or
+        // if we have properties-based Creator (for which we probably SHOULD do
+        // different contextualization?)
         if ((_deser == null) && (_inputType != null) && (_creatorProps == null)) {
             return new FactoryBasedEnumDeserializer(this,
                     ctxt.findContextualValueDeserializer(_inputType, property));
@@ -116,11 +121,14 @@ public LogicalType logicalType() {
     public Object deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException
     {
         Object value;
+
+        // First: the case of having deserializer for non-String input for delegating
+        // Creator method
         if (_deser != null) {
             value = _deser.deserialize(p, ctxt);
-        } else if (_hasArgs) {
-            JsonToken curr = p.currentToken();
 
+        // Second: property- and delegating-creators
+        } else if (_hasArgs) {
             // 30-Mar-2020, tatu: For properties-based one, MUST get JSON Object (before
             //   2.11, was just assuming match)
             if (_creatorProps != null) {
@@ -138,15 +146,9 @@ public Object deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOEx
                 return deserializeEnumUsingPropertyBased(p, ctxt, _propCreator);
             }
 
-            // 30-Mar-2020, tatu: Single-arg delegating creators may go through
-            //    here; although not 100% sure why they do not take the first branch
-            if (curr == JsonToken.VALUE_STRING || curr == JsonToken.FIELD_NAME) {
-                value = p.getText();
-            } else if (curr == JsonToken.VALUE_NUMBER_INT) {
-                value = p.getNumberValue();
-            } else {
-                value = p.getValueAsString();
-            }
+            // 12-Oct-2021, tatu: We really should only get here if and when String
+            //    value is expected; otherwise Deserializer should have been used earlier
+            value = p.getValueAsString();
         } else { // zero-args; just skip whatever value there may be
             p.skipChildren();
             try {
@@ -160,10 +162,13 @@ public Object deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOEx
             return _factory.callOnWith(_valueClass, value);
         } catch (Exception e) {
             Throwable t = ClassUtil.throwRootCauseIfIOE(e);
-            // [databind#1642]:
-            if (ctxt.isEnabled(DeserializationFeature.READ_UNKNOWN_ENUM_VALUES_AS_NULL) &&
-                    t instanceof IllegalArgumentException) {
-                return null;
+            if (t instanceof IllegalArgumentException) {
+                // [databind#1642]:
+                if (ctxt.isEnabled(DeserializationFeature.READ_UNKNOWN_ENUM_VALUES_AS_NULL)) {
+                    return null;
+                }
+                // 12-Oct-2021, tatu: Should probably try to provide better exception since
+                //   we likely hit argument incompatibility... Or can this happen?
             }
             return ctxt.handleInstantiationProblem(_valueClass, value, t);
         }

src/test/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/deser/jdk/EnumDeserializationTest.java

@@ -134,8 +134,6 @@ static enum StrictEnumCreator {
         }
     }
 
-    // // 
-
     public enum AnEnum {
         ZERO,
         ONE
@@ -217,6 +215,33 @@ public String toString() {
         }
     }        
 
+    // [databind#3006]
+    enum Operation3006 {
+        ONE(1L), TWO(2L), THREE(3L);
+
+        private static final Map<Long, Operation3006> mapping = new HashMap<>();
+        static {
+            for (Operation3006 operation : Operation3006.values()) {
+                mapping.put(operation.id, operation);
+            }
+        }
+
+        final long id;
+
+        Operation3006(final long id) {
+            this.id = id;
+        }
+
+        @JsonCreator
+        public static Operation3006 forValue(final String idStr) {
+            Operation3006 candidate = mapping.get(Long.parseLong(idStr));
+            if (candidate == null) {
+                throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unable to find: " + idStr);
+            }
+            return candidate;
+        }
+    }
+
     /*
     /**********************************************************
     /* Test methods
@@ -618,4 +643,13 @@ public void testAllowCaseInsensitiveEnumValues() throws Exception {
         assertEquals(1, result.map.size());
         assertEquals("val", result.map.get(TestEnum.JACKSON));
     }
+
+    // [databind#3006]
+    public void testIssue3006() throws Exception
+    {
+        assertEquals(Operation3006.ONE, MAPPER.readValue("1", Operation3006.class));
+        assertEquals(Operation3006.ONE, MAPPER.readValue(q("1"), Operation3006.class));
+        assertEquals(Operation3006.THREE, MAPPER.readValue("3", Operation3006.class));
+        assertEquals(Operation3006.THREE, MAPPER.readValue(q("3"), Operation3006.class));
+    }
 }