-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support null data in nodes #4380
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
35 changes: 35 additions & 0 deletions
35
src/test/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/node/NullDataEqualsTest.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ | ||
package com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node; | ||
|
||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
|
||
import java.math.BigDecimal; | ||
import java.math.BigInteger; | ||
|
||
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals; | ||
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotEquals; | ||
|
||
public class NullDataEqualsTest { | ||
@Test | ||
void testNullBinaryNode() { | ||
assertEquals(new BinaryNode(null), new BinaryNode(null)); | ||
assertNotEquals(new BinaryNode(new byte[8]), new BinaryNode(null)); | ||
assertNotEquals(new BinaryNode(null), new BinaryNode(new byte[8])); | ||
assertEquals(-1, new BinaryNode(null).hashCode()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
void testNullBigIntegerNode() { | ||
assertEquals(new BigIntegerNode(null), new BigIntegerNode(null)); | ||
assertNotEquals(new BigIntegerNode(BigInteger.ZERO), new BigIntegerNode(null)); | ||
assertNotEquals(new BigIntegerNode(null), new BigIntegerNode(BigInteger.ZERO)); | ||
assertEquals(0, new BigIntegerNode(null).hashCode()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
void testNullDecimalNode() { | ||
assertEquals(new DecimalNode(null), new DecimalNode(null)); | ||
assertNotEquals(new DecimalNode(BigDecimal.ZERO), new DecimalNode(null)); | ||
assertNotEquals( new DecimalNode(null), new DecimalNode(BigDecimal.ZERO)); | ||
assertEquals(0, new DecimalNode(null).hashCode()); | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
huh? Oh, that's how code already was. Ok. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But not sure why not use
BigDecimal.hashCode()
, fwtw.Maybe something else to change in.... 2.17 I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pre-existing equals method is odd as well. It would be easier to use
.equals
on the BigDecimal instances.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
compareTo and the special hashCode are necessary here because BigDecimal equality is weird wrt scaling. 1.9 and 1.90 are considered unequal by BigDecimal but equal by this DecimalNode impl.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok; will then leave that as-is.