Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Killough Model for capillary hysteresis #2159

Draft
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: jafranc/refactor/relpermHysteresis
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jafranc
Copy link
Contributor

@jafranc jafranc commented Nov 12, 2022

This PR aims at implementing Killough[1] model for capillary hysteresis with possible t-reversal option. It comes after #2207 introducing KilloughHysteresis.

These steps will be implemented

  • Create a TableCapillaryPressureHysteresis mirroring TableRelativePermeabilityHysteresis.
  • Create the associated Kernel

Same notations as for the implementation of hysteresis for relative permeability are be adopted.

[1] Killough, J. E. "Reservoir simulation with history-dependent saturation functions." Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 16.01 (1976): 37-48. link
[2] Kleppe, J., et al. "Representation of capillary pressure hysteresis in reservoir simulation." SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. OnePetro, 1997.

Additionally:

  • create a unitTest for TableCapillaryPressureHysteresis
  • add an integrated test using TableCapillaryPressureHysteresis

jafranc and others added 10 commits January 5, 2023 18:41
# Conflicts:
#	src/coreComponents/constitutive/CMakeLists.txt
#	src/coreComponents/constitutive/capillaryPressure/CapillaryPressureBase.cpp
#	src/coreComponents/constitutive/capillaryPressure/CapillaryPressureExtrinsicData.hpp
#	src/coreComponents/constitutive/relativePermeability/TableRelativePermeabilityHysteresis.cpp
#	src/coreComponents/constitutive/relativePermeability/TableRelativePermeabilityHysteresis.hpp
# Conflicts:
#	integratedTests
#	src/coreComponents/constitutive/CMakeLists.txt
#	src/coreComponents/constitutive/relativePermeability/TableRelativePermeabilityHysteresis.cpp
#	src/coreComponents/constitutive/relativePermeability/TableRelativePermeabilityHysteresis.hpp
#	src/coreComponents/constitutiveDrivers/relativePermeability/RelpermDriverRunTest.hpp
#	src/coreComponents/physicsSolvers/fluidFlow/CompositionalMultiphaseBase.hpp
#	src/coreComponents/physicsSolvers/fluidFlow/IsothermalCompositionalMultiphaseFVMKernelUtilities.hpp
#	src/coreComponents/physicsSolvers/fluidFlow/wells/CompositionalMultiphaseWell.hpp
#	src/coreComponents/physicsSolvers/fluidFlow/wells/WellFields.hpp
#	src/coreComponents/schema/docs/TableRelativePermeabilityHysteresis.rst
#	src/coreComponents/schema/docs/TableRelativePermeabilityHysteresis_other.rst
#	src/coreComponents/schema/schema.xsd.other
#	src/coreComponents/unitTests/constitutiveTests/CMakeLists.txt
@paveltomin paveltomin changed the base branch from develop to jafranc/refactor/relpermHysteresis December 20, 2024 22:26
@paveltomin
Copy link
Contributor

@jafranc should jafranc/refactor/relpermHysteresis be the base branch for this? can they get synced somehow? i tried to look at the conflicts but i am afraid i won't be able to resolve them

@paveltomin paveltomin changed the base branch from jafranc/refactor/relpermHysteresis to develop January 8, 2025 19:49
@paveltomin paveltomin changed the base branch from develop to jafranc/refactor/relpermHysteresis January 8, 2025 19:50
@paveltomin
Copy link
Contributor

@jafranc should jafranc/refactor/relpermHysteresis be the base branch for this? can they get synced somehow? i tried to look at the conflicts but i am afraid i won't be able to resolve them

@rrsettgast sorry I can not resolve conflicts myself here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants