Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes #3280 #3281

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

fixes #3280 #3281

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

bena-nasa
Copy link
Collaborator

@bena-nasa bena-nasa commented Jan 6, 2025

Here's my quick proposal to fix the UFS issue with the masking, would be easy to back port. We set the destination mask values as an attribute in the grid, if they don't no masking applied. If they are there, we can mask all the values set in the grid

The other way to fix this would for for @metdyn to use dynamic masking in the sampler.

Either way @metdyn should probably test this with geostationary sampler.

I've made this contingent if we want a different solution but put it here for debate.

Types of change(s)

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Trivial change (affects only documentation or cleanup)
  • Refactor (no functional changes, no api changes)

Checklist

  • Tested this change with a run of GEOSgcm
  • Ran the Unit Tests (make tests)

Description

Related Issue

@bena-nasa bena-nasa added 🎁 New Feature This is a new feature 0 Diff The changes in this pull request have verified to be zero-diff with the target branch. 🚫 Contingent - DNA Do Not Approve (DNA). These changes are contingent on other PRs ❗ High Priority This is a high priority PR labels Jan 6, 2025
@bena-nasa bena-nasa requested a review from tclune January 6, 2025 16:23
@bena-nasa bena-nasa requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 16:23
tclune
tclune previously approved these changes Jan 6, 2025
@bena-nasa bena-nasa removed the 🚫 Contingent - DNA Do Not Approve (DNA). These changes are contingent on other PRs label Jan 6, 2025
@bena-nasa bena-nasa requested a review from tclune January 6, 2025 20:24
@bena-nasa bena-nasa merged commit c8ad63f into develop Jan 6, 2025
48 checks passed
@bena-nasa bena-nasa deleted the feature/bmauer/fixes-#3280 branch January 6, 2025 22:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0 Diff The changes in this pull request have verified to be zero-diff with the target branch. ❗ High Priority This is a high priority PR 🎁 New Feature This is a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants