Fix: Precise Assembler cannot accept UEV+ machine blocks.

[Apeiria01]

This is a hard-coded temporary fix, we might need a method (likely to be placed in util?) to retrieve all xxV machine blocks, exclude those wiered blocks like Bronze Plated Bricks with same java type but different meta.
I guess other MTE s like ExxonMobil also suffer from accepting wired blocks instead of accept only XXv machine blocks as expected.

[serenibyss]

I think this change would be nice to make eventually, but currently some of these later casings would allow quite cheap tier skips, since for example UEV machine casing is only Bedrockium, and UIV machine casing is only Black Plutonium, allowing you to cheaply bypass more expensive casings like the UHV machine casing which is made out of Neutronium

[Apeiria01]

While you can use some cheaper machine blocks, you still have to place energy hatches that matches the recipe. So at least accepting UEV+ blocks shall not let you bypass the voltage limit of assembler recipes.

[FourIsTheNumber]

While you can use some cheaper machine blocks, you still have to place energy hatches that matches the recipe. So at least accepting UEV+ blocks shall not let you bypass the voltage limit of assembler recipes.

It's not about bypassing the voltage limit, it's that you could use UEV or UIV hull as cheaper casings in a UHV prass with a UHV energy hatch.

[Apeiria01]

Maybe we should correct the description to indicate that PreciseAssembler accepts UHV- machine blocks, not all machine blocks?

[Apeiria01]

I think another feasible solution is to add another machine structure check to ensure machine block's tier <= energy hatch tier? So that the machine would report an incomplete structure if you are using UEV+ machine block but dont have UEV+ energy hatches

[Apeiria01]

Now we have to place energy hatches with tier >= machine blocks

[serenibyss]

@Apeiria01 Thank you for the effort, though I think simply updating the tooltip to reflect that only UHV and below is allowed currently would be a better approach for now. Eventually once these casings have more proper recipes, I think PrAss should allow these casings, at which point a change like this would be no longer necessary either. And for currently, I think this change is a bit unintuitive and could break bases unnecessarily