Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move ConfidentialInstanceType "TDX" from Beta to GA #11849

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

runanwang-dev
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes b/369878478

compute: move `TDX` instance option for `confidential_instance_type` in `google_compute_instance` from Beta to GA(ga)

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

google provider: Diff ( 10 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-))
google-beta provider: Diff ( 8 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-))

Missing test report

Your PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test.

Resource: google_compute_instance_from_template (20 total tests)
Please add an acceptance test which includes these fields. The test should include the following:

resource "google_compute_instance_from_template" "primary" {
  confidential_instance_config {
    confidential_instance_type = # value needed
  }
}

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 1015
Passed tests: 940
Skipped tests: 74
Affected tests: 1

Click here to see the affected service packages
  • compute

Action taken

Found 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
  • TestAccComputeInstanceFromMachineImage_confidentialInstanceConfigMain

Get to know how VCR tests work

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

$\textcolor{red}{\textsf{Tests failed during RECORDING mode:}}$
TestAccComputeInstanceFromMachineImage_confidentialInstanceConfigMain[Error message] [Debug log]

$\textcolor{red}{\textsf{Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR.}}$

View the build log or the debug log for each test

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

google provider: Diff ( 10 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-))
google-beta provider: Diff ( 7 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-))

Missing test report

Your PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test.

Resource: google_compute_instance_from_template (20 total tests)
Please add an acceptance test which includes these fields. The test should include the following:

resource "google_compute_instance_from_template" "primary" {
  confidential_instance_config {
    confidential_instance_type = # value needed
  }
}

1 similar comment
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

google provider: Diff ( 10 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-))
google-beta provider: Diff ( 7 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-))

Missing test report

Your PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test.

Resource: google_compute_instance_from_template (20 total tests)
Please add an acceptance test which includes these fields. The test should include the following:

resource "google_compute_instance_from_template" "primary" {
  confidential_instance_config {
    confidential_instance_type = # value needed
  }
}

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 1015
Passed tests: 941
Skipped tests: 74
Affected tests: 0

Click here to see the affected service packages
  • compute

$\textcolor{green}{\textsf{All tests passed!}}$

View the build log

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 1015
Passed tests: 941
Skipped tests: 74
Affected tests: 0

Click here to see the affected service packages
  • compute

$\textcolor{green}{\textsf{All tests passed!}}$

View the build log

@runanwang-dev runanwang-dev marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2024 00:50
Copy link

Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run.

@ScottSuarez, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look.

You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

@ScottSuarez This PR has been waiting for review for 3 weekdays. Please take a look! Use the label disable-review-reminders to disable these notifications.

@ScottSuarez ScottSuarez merged commit 39b9041 into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Oct 1, 2024
12 checks passed
karolgorc pushed a commit to karolgorc/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
niharika-98 pushed a commit to niharika-98/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
trodge pushed a commit to trodge/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
karolgorc pushed a commit to karolgorc/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
gontech pushed a commit to gontech/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
BBBmau pushed a commit to BBBmau/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
BBBmau pushed a commit to BBBmau/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
BBBmau pushed a commit to BBBmau/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
akshat-jindal-nit pushed a commit to akshat-jindal-nit/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants