Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
attestation: add initial attestation helpers, integrate into
brew install
#17049attestation: add initial attestation helpers, integrate into
brew install
#17049Changes from all commits
48e39bb
578c2bc
1881a1f
a99100b
ca6db49
e52c253
a3a5f78
5ec3dab
2efef36
6e10001
990b7d7
480e48b
e2b5d93
faa00c8
1607d04
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check warning on line 1263 in Library/Homebrew/formula_installer.rb
Codecov / codecov/patch
Library/Homebrew/formula_installer.rb#L1263
Check warning on line 1265 in Library/Homebrew/formula_installer.rb
Codecov / codecov/patch
Library/Homebrew/formula_installer.rb#L1265
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems weird no tests cover this, is this used anywhere right now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The tests currently use a double for it, so I think that's what it doesn't get coverage. Want me to add some separate coverage for it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeh or just double lower in the stack (the owner/tag/rebuild) so it still gets called?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done with 1607d04 -- I went with a separate test since the more invasive double was going to require a lot of nesting that would make the other tests harder to read, but I can shoehorn it in if that's your preference 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I also had to move the
BottleSpecification
specs to their own file, since RuboCop was complaining about having twoRSpec
stanzas inbottle_spec.rb
.)Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.