Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Piecewise functions #83

Closed
wants to merge 28 commits into from
Closed

Piecewise functions #83

wants to merge 28 commits into from

Conversation

tclose
Copy link
Contributor

@tclose tclose commented Jan 27, 2015

This PR addresses issue #74.

In the MathML subset used by SBML you are able to define piecewise functions, which could (probably will) be the long term plan to support this feature. However, in the mean time this PR adds similar functionality to NineML MathInline syntax, copying most of the format from MathML.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.05%) to 75.17% when pulling 5b04ba07bb988c2ce1c849d027b8894bc1621024 on tclose:piecewise into 9e5b232 on INCF:master.

@apdavison
Copy link
Member

Again, I don't think I can really review this until the refactoring PR is merged.

@tclose
Copy link
Contributor Author

tclose commented Feb 3, 2015

No worries, I am testing out the Brunel model now so hopefully I can get
back to you soon.

On 3 February 2015 at 21:32, Andrew Davison [email protected]
wrote:

Again, I don't think I can really review this until the refactoring PR
is merged.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#83 (comment).

Thomas G. Close, PhD.
Postdoctoral Researcher,
Computational Neuroscience Unit,
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
e: [email protected]
w: +81 98 966 8804

@tclose
Copy link
Contributor Author

tclose commented Feb 3, 2015

I meant to say that I could rebase them on to the old master if there is a
problem with the refactoring but if there is not a problem it would be
easier to wait until it is merged

On 3 February 2015 at 21:34, Tom Close [email protected] wrote:

No worries, I am testing out the Brunel model now so hopefully I can get
back to you soon.

On 3 February 2015 at 21:32, Andrew Davison [email protected]
wrote:

Again, I don't think I can really review this until the refactoring PR
is merged.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#83 (comment).

Thomas G. Close, PhD.
Postdoctoral Researcher,
Computational Neuroscience Unit,
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
e: [email protected]
w: +81 98 966 8804

Thomas G. Close, PhD.
Postdoctoral Researcher,
Computational Neuroscience Unit,
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
e: [email protected]
w: +81 98 966 8804

Tom Close added 26 commits February 6, 2015 10:24
Conflicts:
	catalog/randomdistributions/bernoulli.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/beta.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/binomial.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/cauchy.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/chi-square.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/dirichlet.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/exponential.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/geometric.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/hypergeometric.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/laplace.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/log-normal.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/logistic.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/multinomial.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/multivariate-normal.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/multivariate-student-t.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/negative-binomial.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/normal-inverse-gamma.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/normal.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/pareto.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/poisson.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/student-t.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/uniform.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/weibull.xml
	catalog/randomdistributions/wishart.xml
to OutputEvent (should have really been part of 'update_schema' PR but
that has been merged now)
(as a shortcut for having to make nearly identical changes for the most
part)
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.08%) to 76.19% when pulling 48d92e7 on tclose:piecewise into 86967a9 on INCF:master.

@tclose
Copy link
Contributor Author

tclose commented Mar 22, 2015

Will reopen this in the new lib9ML repository

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants