Simplify Infisical secrets check workflow

[guibranco]

Description

• Streamlined the Infisical secrets check by replacing multiple steps with a single action.
• Improved maintainability and readability of the workflow file.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	infisical-secrets-check.yml Simplify Infisical secrets check workflow                                .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml Replaced multiple steps for Infisical secrets check with a single action. Updated to use guibranco/[email protected]. Removed redundant installation and scanning steps. Streamlined the workflow for better maintainability. +2/-85

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Streamlined the Infisical secrets check process with a single action, simplifying the workflow.

• Bug Fixes

  • Reduced potential points of failure by consolidating multiple steps into one action.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@penify-dev[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7dd43e7 and 702186c.

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this pull request simplify the process of performing an Infisical secrets check within the GitHub Actions workflow. The previous implementation required multiple manual steps, including setting up the environment and processing results. The new approach replaces these steps with a single action call to guibranco/[email protected], streamlining the workflow while retaining the same functionality.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml	Added a step for Infisical secrets check using a new action.

Poem

In the code where secrets hide,
A rabbit hops with joy and pride.
One action now, so swift and neat,
Simplifying tasks, oh what a treat!
With every check, our code's secure,
Thanks to the change, we can be sure! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve replacing multiple steps with a single action, which simplifies the workflow.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add a failure handling step for the secrets check Consider adding a step to handle the case where the secrets check fails, ensuring that appropriate actions are taken to notify the team or log the failure. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26] - name: Infisical secrets check - uses: guibranco/[email protected] +- name: Handle secrets check failure + if: failure() + run: echo "Secrets check failed, please review the logs." Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding a failure handling step is crucial for maintaining awareness of potential issues in the secrets check process, which can help in timely responses to security concerns.	8
Enhancement	Update the action to use the latest stable version Ensure that the version of the guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action is the latest stable version to benefit from any recent updates or bug fixes. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [26] -- uses: guibranco/[email protected] +- uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@latest Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Updating to the latest stable version can help avoid bugs and security vulnerabilities, though the current version may still function correctly.	7
	Add a summarization step for the secrets check results It may be beneficial to include a step that summarizes the results of the secrets check, providing immediate feedback on the outcome. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [25-26] - name: Infisical secrets check - uses: guibranco/[email protected] +- name: Summarize results + run: echo "Secrets check completed. Review the logs for details." Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While summarizing results can improve user experience, it is not as crucial as handling failures or ensuring the action is up-to-date.	5
Best practice	Add a timeout to the secrets check action to avoid indefinite hanging Consider adding a timeout for the secrets check action to prevent the workflow from hanging indefinitely. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [26] - uses: guibranco/[email protected] + timeout-minutes: 10 Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding a timeout is a good practice to ensure that workflows do not hang indefinitely, although it may not be critical if the action is known to complete in a reasonable time.	6

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

10:09PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:09PM INF 69 commits scanned.
10:09PM INF scan completed in 201ms
10:09PM INF no leaks found

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud