-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add @develop to ufs-weather-model #217
Add @develop to ufs-weather-model #217
Conversation
…platform override and mom6solo variants; remove ESMFMKFILE setting
"simdmultiarch", default=False, description="Enable multi-target SIMD instruction sets" | ||
) | ||
variant("debug", default=False, description="Enable DEBUG mode", when="@develop") | ||
variant( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that this horrible debug link mpi option needs to go away, it's not portable and not something we should be doing. @aerorahul @DusanJovic-NOAA and I have fought this bad practice for a while, but with moving to spack-stack we should really get rid of it.
variant("moving_nest", default=False, description="Enable moving nest code", when="@develop") | ||
variant("openmp", default=True, description="Enable OpenMP") | ||
variant("parallel_netcdf", default=True, description="Enable parallel NetCDF") | ||
variant( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if this option works at all, it's certainly not the way we integrate the UFS with JEDI here: JCSDA/ufs-bundle#9
@mark-a-potts @aerorahul Can you provide more information on this option?
description="Enable atmosphere-ocean flux calculation in mediator", | ||
when="@develop", | ||
) | ||
variant( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this a variant? Is there a way to build the UFS without CCPP physics?
@climbfuji For what it's worth, my overall approach has been to try to make variants match as closely as possible with what's provided in cmake (though I have not implemented every available switch from the various submodules, only the one or two that I seemed to need for doing RTs), and leaving the rest up to the user. So nothing here is necessarily a guarantee of the underlying functionality in UFS WM. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume you have tested those changes, I haven't. It looks ok to me, though I don't think the CCPP=false
option will work.
This PR makes significant revisions to the ufs-weather-model package. Namely, it adds a version for the head of the develop branch and has updates to variants and dependencies, as well as one or two patches.