Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more methods on thunks to make ChainRules work on 1.0 #381

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 23, 2021
Merged

Conversation

mzgubic
Copy link
Member

@mzgubic mzgubic commented Jun 23, 2021

solving 1.0 errors in JuliaDiff/ChainRules.jl#449

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 23, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #381 (64714e9) into master (66bd0a1) will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #381      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.12%   89.20%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines         561      565       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          500      504       +4     
  Misses         61       61              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/differentials/thunks.jl 94.89% <100.00%> (+0.21%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 66bd0a1...64714e9. Read the comment docs.

@mzgubic mzgubic changed the title WIP: Add more methods on thunks to make ChainRules work on 1.0 Add more methods on thunks to make ChainRules work on 1.0 Jun 23, 2021
@mzgubic mzgubic merged commit 653cd7d into master Jun 23, 2021
@mzgubic mzgubic deleted the mz/thunks2 branch June 23, 2021 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants