Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v3.16.2 #290

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

juul-mobile-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier (source) dependencies patch 3.16.1 -> 3.16.2

Release Notes

jqno/equalsverifier (nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier)

v3.16.2

Changed
  • The error message in some edge cases involving complex generics and abstract classes is now improved. (Issue 983)
  • The line in the error message that shows the version of EqualsVerifier and the JDK, now also indicates whether EqualsVerifier runs on the classpath or the modulepath.
Deprecated
  • withResetCaches() was once needed for use in Quarkus, but caches are now reset automatically on every run.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@twyatt twyatt enabled auto-merge (squash) August 23, 2024 16:33
@twyatt twyatt merged commit d608d4b into main Aug 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@twyatt twyatt deleted the renovate/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.x branch August 26, 2024 16:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants