alloy bump #113
Closed
alloy bump #113
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
but 2 contracts import a common interface, I mean how can i delete one of them ? 🤣 |
|
@TomasArrachea i took a small look last time, but just wanted to know your views. This would need to be merged soon. ,since reth uses latest alloy which is leading to incompatibility issues . |
|
closing in favor of #144 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The latest alloy update throws error on duplicate bindings in the json bindings. Figuring out the best way .
Would have to remove the duplicate bindings manually .