Fix transaction history report

[sameersubudhi]

What was the problem?

This PR resolves #2020

How was it solved?

• Refactor code & clean dead code
• Introduces flexibility in job scheduling (depending on request params and live index status)
• Fix reporting logic (now completely event driven)
• Adds handling for missing scenarios
• Cache (LRU) public keys in-memory
• Increase moleculer broker timeouts to 10s
• Add auto job rescheduling
• Update final report structure to be lean and notes to be short & precise
• Fix existing unit tests
• Add new unit tests
• Improved logging in queue (microservice param validations)

How was it tested?

• Ran against both mainnet and testnet on multiple servers
• Exported history for various addresses during different phases of indexing

[ishantiw]

Overall LGTM, I will go through the transactionExport file again to double check

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 228 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (c17581b) 68.33% compared to head (9032ed2) 67.89%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on development.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development    #2021      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        68.33%   67.89%   -0.44%     
===============================================
  Files              300      303       +3     
  Lines             5429     5704     +275     
  Branches           991     1081      +90     
===============================================
+ Hits              3710     3873     +163     
- Misses            1719     1831     +112     

Files	Coverage Δ
services/blockchain-app-registry/config.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
services/blockchain-indexer/shared/constants.js	54.11% <ø> (ø)
services/export/config.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
services/export/shared/excelFieldMappings.js	100.00% <ø> (ø)
services/export/shared/helpers/array.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
services/export/shared/helpers/constants.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
services/export/shared/helpers/event.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
services/export/shared/helpers/file.js	93.02% <100.00%> (+3.73%)	⬆️
services/export/shared/helpers/requestAll.js	64.10% <ø> (ø)
services/export/shared/helpers/time.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 9 more

[ishantiw]

I have tested scenarios taking regular account, validator account and account with incoming crossChainTransfer and looks good to me. Great job 👏

[nagdahimanshu]

LGTM 🚀