fix: discontinue the use of depinject #160
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces substantial modifications across multiple files, focusing on enhancing the command structure and integrating WASM functionalities within a Cosmos SDK application. Key updates include the introduction of new files for encoding configurations, the removal of obsolete files, and extensive refactoring of existing files such as Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
…in/mantrachain into discontinue-depinject
|
@coderabbitai could you read through this pull request again, and be quite nit picky about it? It is a big one, and we could use another pair of eyes. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 27
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
app/test_support.go (2)
13-23: Consider the implications of exposing internal components.The getter methods for IBCKeeper, ScopedIBCKeeper, and BaseApp are correctly implemented and align with the PR objective of removing dependency injection. However, directly exposing these internal components might reduce encapsulation and make the system more tightly coupled.
Consider if there are specific use cases (e.g., testing) that require these getters, and if so, whether they can be moved to a separate test-only file or package to maintain better encapsulation in the production code.
1-39: Overall assessment: The file is well-structured but needs minor adjustments.The
test_support.gofile successfully introduces getter methods for various keepers and app components, aligning with the PR objective of removing dependency injection. The implementation is generally correct and provides necessary access to components.However, there are a few points to consider:
- Encapsulation: Consider the implications of exposing internal components and whether these getters can be isolated to a test-only package.
- Consistency: Address the inconsistency in return types, particularly for the
GetStakingKeepermethod.- WASM support: Confirm if WASM support should be maintained, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
After addressing these points, the file will be in good shape and ready for integration into the project.
app/encoding.go (2)
13-20: LGTM:MakeEncodingConfigfunction is well-implemented.The function is correctly designed for testing purposes and aligns with the PR objectives. It creates a temporary app instance and uses it to generate the encoding configuration, which is a good approach for isolated testing.
Consider adding more detailed documentation to explain:
- The purpose of creating a temporary app instance.
- Why this approach is used instead of direct dependency injection.
- Any limitations or considerations when using this function in tests.
22-30: LGTM:makeEncodingConfigfunction is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling.The function correctly encapsulates the logic for creating an encoding configuration using components from the temporary app. This aligns with the PR objective of having more control over the application's functionality.
Consider adding error handling to deal with potential nil values or initialization failures. For example:
func makeEncodingConfig(tempApp *App) (params.EncodingConfig, error) { if tempApp == nil { return params.EncodingConfig{}, errors.New("tempApp is nil") } encodingConfig := params.EncodingConfig{ InterfaceRegistry: tempApp.InterfaceRegistry(), Codec: tempApp.AppCodec(), TxConfig: tempApp.TxConfig(), Amino: tempApp.LegacyAmino(), } // Add checks for nil values of individual components if encodingConfig.InterfaceRegistry == nil { return params.EncodingConfig{}, errors.New("failed to initialize InterfaceRegistry") } // Add similar checks for other components return encodingConfig, nil }This change would make the function more robust and easier to debug if issues arise.
.golangci.yml (1)
33-33: Approved: Insightful comment on potential future linter addition.The added comment about potentially re-enabling the 'maintidx' linter in the future is a good reminder for code quality improvements. The 'maintidx' linter helps keep function complexity at bay by calculating a maintainability index.
Consider creating an issue to track the potential re-enabling of the 'maintidx' linter. This would involve:
- Evaluating the current codebase complexity.
- Setting appropriate thresholds for the maintainability index.
- Planning for gradual implementation to avoid overwhelming developers with sudden strict checks.
Would you like me to draft an issue for tracking the 'maintidx' linter re-enablement?
app/params/weights.go (2)
5-18: Consider adding documentation for weight values and potential refinement.The constants for message operations are well-named and follow a consistent pattern. However, to improve maintainability and understanding:
- Consider adding comments explaining the rationale behind the weight values, especially for operations with significantly different weights (e.g.,
MsgMultiSendat 10 vsMsgSendat 100).- Evaluate if the current weight distribution accurately reflects the desired simulation behavior. For example, is
MsgEditValidator(weight 5) intended to be much less frequent than other validator operations?Would you like assistance in drafting explanatory comments for these weight values?
1-42: Overall: Well-structured file with opportunities for enhancement.This file provides a comprehensive set of simulation weights for various blockchain operations, which is crucial for accurate testing and simulation of the MANTRA-Chain project. The constants are well-organized and follow a consistent naming convention, which is commendable.
To further improve this file:
- Add comments explaining the rationale behind weight values, especially for operations with significantly different weights.
- Review and potentially adjust weights for governance and smart contract proposals to ensure they accurately represent expected blockchain activity.
- Consider consolidating similar constants (e.g., proposal weights) to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.
- Ensure that the weight distribution aligns with the project's goals for simulation accuracy across different types of operations.
These enhancements will improve the file's maintainability and the accuracy of simulations based on these weights.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions or in drafting explanatory comments for the weight values?
x/tax/types/genesis_test.go (1)
Line range hint
11-26: LGTM! Consider creating a follow-up task for post-launch cleanup.The
init()function correctly sets up the SDK configuration for address prefixes, ensuring that tests validate against precise values used in genesis. This is a good temporary solution.To ensure this temporary setup is not forgotten, would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the task of removing this
init()function post-launch and updating the test addresses to use default prefixes?x/tax/keeper/msg_update_params_test.go (1)
13-29: LGTM! Consider clarifying the comment.The
init()function correctly sets up the Bech32 prefixes for the test environment, which is crucial for ensuring that the tests use the same address formats as the genesis state. The implementation is correct and aligns with the project's requirements.Consider updating the comment to be more specific about when this function can be removed:
-// init() is required to set the bech32 prefix for the test -// most likely, we can remove this post-launch by simply using the default prefixes and updating the addresses in the test. -// it is here so that we can test against the precise values that will be used in genesis. +// init() sets the bech32 prefix for the test to match the genesis state. +// TODO: Post-launch, consider removing this function and updating the test addresses to use default prefixes. +// This ensures tests use the same address formats as the initial genesis state.x/tax/module/genesis_test.go (1)
14-30: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO for post-launch cleanup.The
init()function correctly sets up the Bech32 prefixes for the MANTRA-Chain, ensuring that the tests use the same address formats as the actual genesis state. This is a good practice for maintaining consistency between tests and production code.Consider adding a TODO comment to remind about potential post-launch cleanup:
// init() is required to set the bech32 prefix for the test // most likely, we can remove this post-launch by simply using the default prefixes and updating the addresses in the test. // it is here so that we can test against the precise values that will be used in genesis. +// TODO: Remove this init function post-launch and update test addresses to use default prefixes func init() { // ... (rest of the function) }This will help future maintainers remember to revisit this initialization post-launch.
x/tokenfactory/module.go (1)
Line range hint
1-228: Summary: Renaming improves clarity, consider broader impact.The changes in this file are limited to renaming
CoinfactoryKeepertoTokenFactoryKeeper, which improves clarity and consistency within the tokenfactory module. However, it's important to consider the broader impact of this change.Please ensure that:
- All references to
CoinfactoryKeeperin other modules or packages have been updated.- Any external documentation or comments referencing
CoinfactoryKeeperare updated.- If there are any database migrations or state changes required due to this renaming, they are properly handled.
Consider running a global search and replace across the entire codebase to catch any remaining instances of
CoinfactoryKeeper.go.mod (1)
46-46: IBC hooks dependency addedThe addition of
github.com/cosmos/ibc-apps/modules/ibc-hooks/v8is consistent with the PR objectives to support WASM hooks. This is a good addition for enhancing the functionality of the project.Consider adding a comment or TODO in the codebase to document the potential future removal of this feature, as mentioned in the PR objectives. This will help future maintainers understand the intent and make informed decisions.
app/wasm.go (1)
6-15: Consider dynamic retrieval of capabilities in the futureCurrently,
AllCapabilitiesreturns a hardcoded list of capabilities. Once the upstream issue wasmvm#425 is resolved, consider updating this function to retrieve capabilities dynamically. This will ensure the capabilities list stays up-to-date with the underlyingwasmvmwithout manual intervention.testutil/network/network.go (1)
Line range hint
10-11: Update function documentation to reflect the removal ofDefaultConfig()The comment references
DefaultConfig(), which has been removed from the codebase. Please update the function documentation to accurately describe the current behavior when no configuration is provided.Apply this diff to update the comment:
-// Accepts optional config, that will be used in place of the DefaultConfig() if provided. +// Accepts an optional config. If none is provided, a zero-value config will be used.app/params/proto.go (2)
1-2: Add a package comment for better documentationIt's recommended to include a package comment to describe the purpose of the
paramspackage. This enhances readability and maintainability.Consider adding:
// Package params provides the encoding configurations for the application. package params
15-15: Evaluate the necessity ofcodec.NewLegacyAmino()The
aminocodec is initialized but may not be required if the application exclusively uses Protobuf encoding. Assess whetheraminois necessary in this context.If
aminoisn't needed, you can remove it to simplify the code:- amino := codec.NewLegacyAmino()And update the return statement accordingly:
return EncodingConfig{ InterfaceRegistry: interfaceRegistry, Codec: marshaler, TxConfig: txCfg, - Amino: amino, + // Amino codec is not used. }app/test_helpers.go (1)
186-191: SimplifySetupWithEmptyStorefunctionThe
SetupWithEmptyStorefunction can directly return the app without the need for a separate variable assignment.Apply this diff for simplification:
-func SetupWithEmptyStore(tb testing.TB) *App { - tb.Helper() - app, _ := setup(tb, "testing", false, 0) - return app +func SetupWithEmptyStore(tb testing.TB) *App { + return setup(tb, "testing", false, 0) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
- .golangci.yml (1 hunks)
- app/app.go (4 hunks)
- app/app_config.go (0 hunks)
- app/config.go (0 hunks)
- app/encoding.go (1 hunks)
- app/export.go (1 hunks)
- app/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- app/genesis_account.go (0 hunks)
- app/ibc.go (0 hunks)
- app/params/doc.go (1 hunks)
- app/params/encoding.go (1 hunks)
- app/params/proto.go (1 hunks)
- app/params/weights.go (1 hunks)
- app/proposals_whitelisting.go (1 hunks)
- app/sim_bench_test.go (0 hunks)
- app/sim_test.go (0 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (1 hunks)
- app/test_support.go (1 hunks)
- app/wasm.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/commands.go (7 hunks)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/testnet.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (4 hunks)
- testutil/network/network.go (1 hunks)
- x/tax/keeper/msg_update_params_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/tax/module/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/tax/types/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/tokenfactory/module.go (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
- app/app_config.go
- app/config.go
- app/genesis_account.go
- app/ibc.go
- app/sim_bench_test.go
- app/sim_test.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/params/doc.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
app/app.go
[notice] 546-546: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious commentapp/test_helpers.go
[notice] 28-28: Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
[notice] 87-87: Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
[notice] 130-130: Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
[notice] 207-207: Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
🔇 Additional comments (27)
app/proposals_whitelisting.go (4)
3-5: LGTM: Import statement is correct and necessary.The import of
govv1beta1from the Cosmos SDK is required for theIsProposalWhitelistedfunction and is correctly implemented.
13-17: Verify the intention of whitelisting all legacy proposals.The
IsProposalWhitelistedfunction currently whitelists all legacy governance proposals by always returningtrue. This approach might pose security risks if not intentional.Consider the following:
- Is it intentional to whitelist all legacy proposals?
- If not, should there be specific logic to determine which proposals to whitelist?
- The
contentparameter is unused. Should it be utilized in the whitelisting decision?To help verify the usage and impact of this function, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of IsProposalWhitelisted and potential security implications # Search for usage of IsProposalWhitelisted echo "Searching for IsProposalWhitelisted usage:" rg --type go "IsProposalWhitelisted" -C 3 # Look for any security-related comments or TODOs echo "Searching for security-related comments:" rg --type go "(?i)(security|todo|fixme).*whitelist.*proposal" -C 2
1-17: Consider refactoring and improving documentation for whitelisting logic.The current implementation in
proposals_whitelisting.goraises several concerns:
Both functions (
IsModuleWhiteListandIsProposalWhitelisted) have identical behavior, always returningtrue. Consider consolidating these into a single function if the distinction between legacy and non-legacy transactions is not necessary.The file lacks comprehensive documentation explaining the rationale behind whitelisting all transactions. This is crucial for understanding the security implications and maintainability of the code.
The unused parameters in both functions suggest that the implementation might be incomplete or oversimplified.
Recommendations:
- If the intention is to temporarily whitelist all transactions, add a TODO comment explaining this and outlining the plan for implementing proper whitelisting logic in the future.
- If the whitelist is meant to be configurable, consider implementing a more flexible solution, such as reading from a configuration file or database.
- Add detailed documentation explaining the security considerations and any planned future enhancements.
Consider the following architectural improvements:
- Implement a more granular whitelisting mechanism that allows for fine-tuned control over which transactions or proposals are whitelisted.
- If different logic is needed for legacy and non-legacy transactions, make this distinction clear in the implementation and documentation.
- Consider moving this logic to a separate package (e.g.,
governanceorsecurity) to better organize the codebase and separate concerns.To help assess the current usage and potential impact of these changes, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the usage and context of whitelisting functions # Search for files referencing governance or proposals echo "Files potentially related to governance or proposals:" fd -e go | xargs grep -l -E "gov|proposal" # Check for any existing whitelisting or security checks echo "Existing whitelisting or security checks:" rg --type go -i "(whitelist|security.check)" -C 2
7-11: Verify the intention of whitelisting all transactions.The
IsModuleWhiteListfunction currently whitelists all non-legacy governance transactions by always returningtrue. This approach might pose security risks if not intentional.Consider the following:
- Is it intentional to whitelist all transactions?
- If not, should there be specific logic to determine which transactions to whitelist?
- The
typeUrlparameter is unused. Should it be utilized in the whitelisting decision?To help verify the usage and impact of this function, you can run the following script:
app/params/encoding.go (4)
1-1: LGTM: Package declaration is correct.The package name
paramsis appropriate for the file's location and follows Go naming conventions.
3-7: LGTM: Import statements are correct and well-organized.The necessary packages from the Cosmos SDK are imported, and the import block is properly formatted.
9-16: LGTM: EncodingConfig struct is well-defined and documented.The
EncodingConfigstruct is properly designed and documented:
- Clear and concise documentation explaining its purpose.
- Appropriate field names and types.
- Follows Go naming conventions.
- Aligns with the PR objectives of removing dependency injection and increasing control over the application's functionality.
1-16: Overall assessment: The new encoding.go file is well-structured and aligns with project objectives.This new file introduces the
EncodingConfigstruct, which is crucial for managing encoding configurations in the application. The implementation is clean, well-documented, and consistent with Go best practices. It supports the PR's goal of removing dependency injection and increasing control over the application's functionality.app/test_support.go (1)
1-11: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are correctly set up for the methods defined in this file. Each import is used and necessary for the getter methods.
app/encoding.go (2)
1-11: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are well-structured and relevant to the file's purpose. The inclusion of
wasmkeeperaligns with the PR objectives mentioning WASM hooks support.
1-30: Overall, the newapp/encoding.gofile is well-implemented and aligns with PR objectives.This new file introduces functionality for creating encoding configurations specifically for testing purposes. It aligns well with the PR objectives of discontinuing dependency injection and providing more control over the application. The implementation supports the creation of a four-node local testnet as mentioned in the PR objectives.
Key points:
- The file structure is clean and logical.
- Both functions serve clear purposes in the testing infrastructure.
- The approach taken supports the goal of moving away from dependency injection.
While the implementation is solid, consider the following minor improvements:
- Add more detailed documentation to the
MakeEncodingConfigfunction.- Implement error handling in the
makeEncodingConfigfunction.These changes would enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code.
app/params/weights.go (1)
1-4: LGTM: Package declaration and file structure are well-organized.The package declaration, blank line, and descriptive comment follow good coding practices and provide clear context for the constants defined in this file.
x/tax/types/genesis_test.go (1)
Line range hint
28-106: LGTM! Theinit()function integrates well with existing tests.The addition of the
init()function ensures that the test cases using "mantra" prefixed addresses are now valid. This change improves the accuracy of the tests by matching the expected genesis state. No modifications to the existing test cases were necessary, which is a good sign of backward compatibility.app/genesis.go (2)
Line range hint
1-27: LGTM for unchanged parts of the file.The remaining parts of the file, including the
distributionandfeemarketmodule configurations, appear to be unchanged and consistent with the PR objectives. TheFeeDenomvariable is correctly set to "uom".Also applies to: 41-89
Line range hint
1-89: Summary: Clarification needed on intended state of genesis.goOverall, the changes in this file involve commenting out the
oracleandmarketmapmodules, which aligns with the goal of discontinuing dependency injection. However, this seems to contradict the PR objective of restoring the genesis.go file from the main branch.Key points:
- The
oracleandmarketmapmodules have been commented out (lines 28-40).- The
distributionandfeemarketmodules remain unchanged.- The
FeeDenomis correctly set to "uom".Please clarify the intended state of this file:
- Should it remain as is with the commented-out modules?
- Or should it be restored from the main branch as mentioned in the PR objectives?
Once this is clarified, we can proceed with any necessary adjustments to ensure consistency between the code changes and the PR objectives.
x/tax/keeper/msg_update_params_test.go (1)
Line range hint
31-116: Existing tests remain valid with the newinit()function.The
TestMsgUpdateParamsfunction and its test cases remain unchanged and are still valid. The addition of theinit()function ensures that the test environment uses the correct Bech32 prefixes, which aligns with the hardcoded "mantra" prefixed addresses used in the test cases.To ensure consistency, let's verify that all addresses in the test cases use the correct "mantra" prefix:
✅ Verification successful
All test case addresses use the correct "mantra" prefix.
The
TestMsgUpdateParamsfunction and its test cases remain valid. All addresses in the test cases correctly use the "mantra" prefix, ensuring consistency with theinit()function's configuration.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all addresses in the test cases use the correct "mantra" prefix. # Test: Search for addresses in the test cases. Expect: Only "mantra" prefixed addresses. rg --type go -i 'mantra[a-z0-9]{39}' x/tax/keeper/msg_update_params_test.goLength of output: 467
x/tax/module/genesis_test.go (2)
Line range hint
1-193: Summary of changes and implicationsThe main change in this file is the addition of the
init()function, which sets up specific Bech32 prefixes for the MANTRA-Chain. This change ensures that the tests use the same address formats as the actual genesis state, improving consistency between tests and production code.Key points:
- The new
init()function affects how addresses are interpreted throughout the tests.- The rest of the file remains unchanged, but the addresses used in the tests should be verified for consistency with the new prefixes.
- There's a possibility of removing this initialization post-launch, as mentioned in the comments.
Overall, this change improves the accuracy of the tests by aligning them more closely with the production environment. However, it's important to ensure that all test cases are updated to use the correct address formats and to plan for potential post-launch cleanup.
Line range hint
31-193: Verify address consistency in testsThe new
init()function sets specific Bech32 prefixes for the MANTRA-Chain. It's important to ensure that all addresses used in the test cases are consistent with these new prefixes.Please run the following script to check for any inconsistencies:
If any inconsistencies are found, please update the addresses to use the correct 'mantra' prefix.
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following script to check for any address inconsistencies without using look-around:
Address Prefix Consistency Verified
No inconsistencies found with addresses not starting with 'mantra' in the test cases. The identified address with the 'cosmos' prefix is used intentionally to test invalid prefix scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for addresses that don't use the 'mantra' prefix in the test file # Test: Search for addresses that don't start with 'mantra' rg --type go -i '(?<!"mantra)[a-z0-9]{39,59}' x/tax/module/genesis_test.go # Note: This regex might produce false positives. Manual verification of the results is recommended.Length of output: 308
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for addresses in the test file that do not start with 'mantra' # Fetch lines containing potential addresses rg --type go '[a-z0-9]{39,59}' x/tax/module/genesis_test.go | grep -v 'mantra'Length of output: 153
x/tokenfactory/module.go (2)
228-228: LGTM! Consistent with previous change.The update in the
ProvideModulefunction to returnTokenFactoryKeeperinstead ofCoinfactoryKeeperis consistent with the previous change in theModuleOutputsstruct. This change maintains consistency within the module.
204-205: LGTM! Verify usage across the codebase.The renaming from
CoinfactoryKeepertoTokenFactoryKeeperimproves clarity and consistency with the module name. This change is approved.Please run the following script to ensure that all occurrences of
CoinfactoryKeeperhave been updated throughout the codebase:go.mod (4)
55-55: Prometheus client dependency updatedThe update of
github.com/prometheus/client_golangto v1.20.4 (indirect) is a good practice to keep the project up-to-date with the latest bug fixes and improvements.
14-15: New protobuf dependency addedThe addition of
github.com/regen-network/protobuf v1.3.3-alpha.regen.1as a replacement forgithub.com/gogo/protobufis a common practice in Cosmos SDK projects and likely improves compatibility.However, please note that this is an alpha version, which may introduce instability. Ensure thorough testing of all protobuf-related functionality. Run the following script to check for any potential issues:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential issues with the new protobuf dependency # Test: Search for any protobuf-related errors or warnings in the codebase rg --type go -e "proto\." -e "protobuf" | grep -i "error\|warning\|todo\|fixme"
90-90: Keyring dependency updatedThe update of
github.com/99designs/keyringfrom v1.2.1 to v1.2.2 is a good practice to keep the project up-to-date with the latest bug fixes and improvements.As this package deals with sensitive keyring functionality, please ensure thorough testing of all keyring-related features. Run the following script to identify areas that might be affected:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify keyring usage in the codebase # Test: Search for keyring usage in the codebase rg --type go "99designs/keyring" -C 5
9-9: Cosmos SDK dependency updatedThe update to a newer version of the Cosmos SDK (v0.50.8-0.20241001101155-992121f93c3d) is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. This change likely includes bug fixes and improvements.
Please ensure that all functionalities depending on the Cosmos SDK are still working as expected after this update. Run the following script to check for any breaking changes or deprecations:
✅ Verification successful
Cosmos SDK update verified
No TODO, FIXME, or deprecated comments related to the Cosmos SDK were found in the codebase. The update to
github.com/MANTRA-Chain/cosmos-sdk v0.50.8-0.20241001101155-992121f93c3dappears to be safe and does not introduce any immediate issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes or deprecations in the Cosmos SDK update # Test: Search for any TODO, FIXME, or deprecated comments related to Cosmos SDK rg --type go -i "(todo|fixme|deprecated).*cosmos" ./Length of output: 3086
app/wasm.go (1)
3-5: Well-documented function with helpful referencesThe comments provide clear documentation of the
AllCapabilitiesfunction and include useful links to relevant documentation and upstream issues. This enhances readability and maintainability.app/params/proto.go (1)
20-24: Ensure SDK configuration is initialized before usageThe function relies on
sdk.GetConfig()to obtain Bech32 prefixes. Verify that the SDK configuration is properly initialized prior to callingMakeEncodingConfig()to prevent potential runtime issues.To confirm, you can check where
sdk.GetConfig()is set up in the codebase.cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/commands.go (1)
136-139: Verify telemetry configuration for WASM metricsThe code conditionally appends
wasmkeeper.WithVMCacheMetrics(prometheus.DefaultRegisterer)towasmOptswhen telemetry is enabled. Please ensure that:
- The
prometheusmetrics are properly registered and configured in your application.prometheus.DefaultRegistereris suitable for your use case and does not conflict with other metric registries.
|
@mantrachain-support: I have reviewed the pull request and gathered the following insights:
Would you like me to rerun the analysis for large functions or focus on any specific areas for further review? 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# List the files changed in the PR
git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD
# Show detailed diffs with context
git diff origin/main...HEAD
# Search for any remaining usages of 'depinject' in the codebase
rg 'depinject'
# Search for any mentions of 'dependency injection' in the codebase
rg 'dependency injection'
# Check for any imports of 'github.com/cosmos/depinject'
rg 'import.*github.com/cosmos/depinject'
# Search for any TODO or FIXME comments that might need attention
rg '\b(TODO|FIXME)\b'
# Look for any large functions (over 100 lines) that might need refactoring
awk '/^func /{func=$0; getline; n=1; while(getline && !/^}/){n++} if(n>100) print FILENAME":"func" - "n" lines"}' $(fd '*.go')
Length of output: 330520 ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
app/params/config.go (2)
8-20: LGTM: Well-structured variable declarations with clear comments.The Bech32 prefix declarations are well-organized and follow a consistent pattern. The comments provide clear explanations for each prefix.
Consider adding a brief comment for the
Bech32Prefixvariable to explain its significance:// Bech32Prefix is the base prefix used for Bech32 addresses in the MANTRA-Chain project. var Bech32Prefix = "mantra"
26-34: LGTM: Well-implemented SetAddressPrefixes function.The function correctly configures Bech32 prefixes for different address types, sets up address verification, and seals the configuration to prevent further modifications. This implementation follows best practices for setting up address prefixes in a Cosmos SDK-based application.
Consider adding error handling for the unlikely scenario where GetConfig() fails:
func SetAddressPrefixes() { - config := sdk.GetConfig() + config := sdk.GetConfig() + if config == nil { + panic("failed to get SDK config") + } config.SetBech32PrefixForAccount(Bech32Prefix, Bech32PrefixAccPub) // ... rest of the function }This change adds a safety check to ensure the configuration is available before proceeding.
app/app.go (2)
533-533: Address TODO: Implement tokenfactory bindingsThere's a TODO comment indicating that tokenfactory bindings need to be added. This functionality should be implemented to ensure complete integration of the tokenfactory module.
Would you like assistance in implementing the tokenfactory bindings or creating a GitHub issue to track this task?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
[notice] 533-533: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
Line range hint
1183-1234: Consider adding error handling for API route registrationsThe RegisterAPIRoutes method comprehensively sets up API routes for the application. However, it doesn't include error handling for the registration calls. Consider adding error checks and appropriate error handling to ensure that all routes are registered successfully and to provide better diagnostics in case of failures.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- app/app.go (4 hunks)
- app/params/config.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
- tests/connect/connect_integration_test.go (0 hunks)
- x/tax/module/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/tax/types/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- tests/connect/connect_integration_test.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- x/tax/module/genesis_test.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/tax/types/genesis_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
app/app.go
[notice] 533-533: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
🔇 Additional comments (20)
app/params/config.go (3)
1-6: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name "params" is suitable for configuration parameters, and the imports are relevant for the Bech32 address prefix functionality.
22-24: LGTM: Appropriate use of init function.The init function ensures that address prefixes are set when the package is imported, guaranteeing early configuration in the application lifecycle.
1-34: Great job: Well-implemented Bech32 prefix configuration.This file demonstrates a solid implementation of Bech32 prefix configuration for a Cosmos SDK-based application. It follows best practices, including:
- Clear and consistent variable naming
- Proper use of the init function for early configuration
- Comprehensive setup of address prefixes for various types
- Implementation of address verification
- Sealing the configuration to prevent unintended modifications
The code is well-structured, easy to understand, and maintainable. Great work on setting up this crucial part of the application!
cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go (9)
7-19: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriatelyThe new imports (
wasmkeeper,simtestutil,txmodule) are consistent with the changes made in the function body. The reordering of imports doesn't affect functionality and may be due to automatic import sorting.
23-24: Update function documentation to reflect correct application nameThe comments on lines 23-24 still refer to "wasmd" instead of "mantrachaind". Please update them to reflect the correct application name.
36-45: LGTM: Client context initialization, but update commentThe client context initialization is comprehensive and correctly uses the components from the encoding configuration. However, the comment on line 44 still refers to "wasmd" instead of "mantrachaind". Please update this comment to reflect the correct application name.
47-48: Update the command description to reflect the correct applicationThe
Shortdescription for the root command is still "Eve Daemon (server)". Please update it to reflect the correct application name, such as "MANTRA Chain Daemon (server)".
55-87: LGTM: Enhanced persistent pre-run functionThe persistent pre-run function has been successfully updated to use
initClientCtxinstead ofclientCtx, aligning with the removal of dependency injection. The new logic for handling sign modes and transaction configuration, especially the addition ofSIGN_MODE_TEXTUALfor online clients, enhances the functionality and flexibility of the application.
98-103: LGTM: Streamlined root command initialization with AutoCLI supportThe root command initialization has been streamlined, consistently using the encoding config and basic module manager from the temporary application. The addition of AutoCLI options with the initialized client context enhances the command-line functionality, providing a more robust and user-friendly interface.
105-110: LGTM: Finalized root command setup with AutoCLI enhancementsThe final steps of the
NewRootCmdfunction effectively use the AutoCLI options to enhance the root command, providing a more feature-rich command-line interface. The overall structure of the function is now more straightforward and less dependent on external injections, which aligns well with the PR objectives of removing dependency injection.This refactoring improves the maintainability and readability of the code while preserving and enhancing functionality.
Line range hint
1-110: Overall assessment: Successful refactoring with minor documentation updates neededThe changes in this file successfully align with the PR objectives of removing dependency injection and simplifying the codebase. The
NewRootCmdfunction has been refactored to provide more direct control over the application's functionality, which is consistent with the stated goals.Key improvements:
- Removal of dependency injection in favor of direct instantiation of components.
- Streamlined initialization of client context and encoding configuration.
- Enhanced support for sign modes, including
SIGN_MODE_TEXTUALfor online clients.- Integration of AutoCLI options for improved command-line functionality.
However, there are a few minor documentation updates needed:
- Update comments referring to "wasmd" to "mantrachaind" (lines 23-24, 44).
- Update the short description of the root command to reflect MANTRA Chain instead of Eve Daemon (line 48).
These changes significantly improve the maintainability and readability of the code while preserving and enhancing functionality. Great work on the refactoring!
26-33: LGTM: Temporary application setup for encoding configurationThe creation of a temporary application instance to retrieve the encoding configuration is a good approach to replace the previous dependency injection method. It allows for direct access to necessary components.
However, please ensure that the
tempDir()function is properly defined or imported, as mentioned in a previous review comment.✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Temporary application setup for encoding configuration
The creation of a temporary application instance to retrieve the encoding configuration is a good approach to replace the previous dependency injection method. It allows for direct access to necessary components.
Verified that the
tempDir()function is properly defined as a variable incmd/mantrachaind/cmd/commands.go.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the definition or import of tempDir() function rg --type go -g '!vendor' 'func tempDir\(\)'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any function named tempDir with any parameters rg --type go 'func\s+tempDir\s*\(' # Search for variable declarations named tempDir rg --type go 'var\s+tempDir\s*[:=]' # Search for import statements that might include tempDir rg --type go 'import\s+\(.*\btempDir\b.*\)'Length of output: 183
app/app.go (8)
1-191: LGTM: Comprehensive imports and well-defined initial setupThe import statements cover a wide range of necessary packages for a Cosmos SDK-based application, including custom modules. The constants, variables, and module account permissions are well-defined and provide a solid foundation for the application.
198-266: LGTM: Well-structured App definitionThe App struct is comprehensively defined, including all necessary components for a Cosmos SDK application with IBC support. The use of pointers for certain keepers and the inclusion of scoped keepers for IBC modules demonstrate good design practices.
702-990: LGTM: Comprehensive module setup and initializationThe module manager setup is thorough, including a wide range of modules and carefully ordering them for begin block, end block, and init genesis operations. This structure ensures proper interaction between modules and correct application behavior.
1002-1041: LGTM: Well-structured ante and post handler setupThe setAnteHandler and setPostHandler methods are well-implemented, providing comprehensive setup for transaction processing. The use of panic for error handling is appropriate in this context, as these handlers are critical for the application's functionality.
1079-1107: LGTM: Clear and concise accessor methodsThese accessor methods (LoadHeight, LegacyAmino, AppCodec, and InterfaceRegistry) are well-implemented, providing clean access to various components of the App. They follow common patterns and are likely useful for testing and external integrations.
1110-1129: LGTM: Well-implemented AutoCliOpts methodThe AutoCliOpts method is correctly implemented, providing the necessary configuration for autocli. It efficiently extracts modules from the ModuleManager and sets up appropriate address codecs, facilitating easy integration with command-line interfaces.
1237-1267: LGTM: Well-implemented utility functionsThe utility functions (GetMaccPerms, BlockedAddresses, and initParamsKeeper) are correctly implemented and serve their specific purposes well. The BlockedAddresses function includes a thoughtful exception for the governance module, allowing it to receive funds.
Line range hint
1-1267: Overall, a well-implemented Cosmos SDK application with room for minor improvementsThis implementation of a Cosmos SDK application is comprehensive and well-structured, including support for numerous modules and IBC functionality. It follows Cosmos SDK conventions and best practices, providing a solid foundation for a complex blockchain application.
There are a few areas where the code could be improved:
- The
Newfunction could benefit from refactoring to improve readability and maintainability.- There's a TODO comment regarding tokenfactory bindings that should be addressed.
- Error handling could be added to the
BeginBlockerandEndBlockermethods.- The
RegisterAPIRoutesmethod could benefit from additional error handling.These suggestions are relatively minor and don't detract from the overall quality of the implementation. Great job on creating a robust Cosmos SDK application!
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
[notice] 533-533: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/app.go (1)
367-701: LGTM: Keeper initializationsThe keeper initializations, including new keepers like TokenFactoryKeeper, TaxKeeper, and FeeMarketKeeper, are properly integrated into the initialization process. The WasmKeeper setup includes appropriate additional options and configurations.
TODO: Implement tokenfactory bindings
There's a TODO comment regarding the implementation of tokenfactory bindings. This should be addressed to ensure full functionality of the TokenFactoryKeeper.
Would you like assistance in implementing the tokenfactory bindings or creating a GitHub issue to track this task?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
[notice] 533-533: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- app/app.go (4 hunks)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
app/app.go (4)
Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:1218-1219 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:25:23.348Z Learning: `authtx.RegisterTxService` does not return an error, so wrapping it with error handling is unnecessary.Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:1187-1193 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:42:08.784Z Learning: The functions `authtx.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes`, `cmtservice.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes`, and `nodeservice.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes` do not return errors.Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:279-701 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:22:11.205Z Learning: The team plans to refactor the `New` function in `app/app.go` in the style of the osmosis repository in the future, following the osmosis repository's approach.Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:1047-1059 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:41:03.927Z Learning: In the codebase, the `BeginBlocker` and `EndBlocker` methods correctly return errors, and error handling is handled by the callers.
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
app/app.go
[notice] 533-533: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
🔇 Additional comments (9)
app/app.go (9)
1-191: LGTM: Import statements and constant declarationsThe import statements, constant declarations, and module account permissions setup look appropriate and comprehensive for a Cosmos SDK application. This section follows standard practices and includes all necessary modules.
279-366: LGTM: App initialization processThe
Newfunction's initialization process is comprehensive and follows Cosmos SDK patterns. The addition of new store keys (e.g., for ratelimit, tokenfactory, tax) aligns well with the new keepers added to the App struct. This section demonstrates proper setup for the expanded functionality of the application.
891-1000: LGTM: Final configurations and app initializationThe final configurations in the
Newfunction, including setting up ABCI extensions, validating proto annotations, and loading the latest version, follow standard practices for a Cosmos SDK app. The initialization of pinned codes in wasmvm and sealing of the CapabilityKeeper are crucial steps for proper functionality and state management.
1002-1041: LGTM: Ante and Post handler setupThe
setAnteHandlerandsetPostHandlerfunctions properly set up their respective handlers with the necessary options. The ante handler includes options for new components like FeeMarketKeeper, ensuring proper integration of new features into the transaction processing pipeline.
1043-1059: LGTM: Blockchain lifecycle functionsThe
PreBlocker,BeginBlocker, andEndBlockerfunctions are correctly implemented, calling the corresponding methods on the ModuleManager. The addition of error returns in these functions is a good practice for better error handling throughout the blockchain lifecycle.
Line range hint
1060-1234: LGTM: InitChainer and accessor functionsThe
InitChainerfunction correctly initializes the chain with the genesis state, unmarshaling the state and initializing the modules. The various getter functions provide necessary access to different components of the app, which is crucial for testing and external interactions. This section follows best practices for a Cosmos SDK application.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
[notice] 533-533: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
1235-1267: LGTM: Helper functionsThe helper functions at the end of the file, including
GetMaccPerms,BlockedAddresses, andinitParamsKeeper, are correctly implemented. These functions provide essential utility for managing module permissions, blocked addresses, and parameter initialization, following standard patterns for Cosmos SDK applications.
702-890: LGTM: Module setup and configurationThe ModuleManager and BasicModuleManager are properly set up with all necessary modules, including new ones like tokenfactory, tax, and feemarket. The order of module execution for begin blockers, end blockers, and init genesis is defined, which is crucial for the correct functioning of the blockchain.
To verify the order of module execution, especially for the new modules, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Module setup and execution order
The order of module execution for BeginBlockers, EndBlockers, and InitGenesis includes the new modules (tokenfactory, tax, and feemarket) appropriately. No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the order of module execution echo "Checking BeginBlockers order:" rg --type go 'SetOrderBeginBlockers\(' -A 20 echo "Checking EndBlockers order:" rg --type go 'SetOrderEndBlockers\(' -A 20 echo "Checking InitGenesis order:" rg --type go 'SetOrderInitGenesis\(' -A 20Length of output: 3040
198-266: App struct updated with new keepers and baseappThe App struct has been updated to include new keepers such as WasmKeeper, RateLimitKeeper, and IBCHooksKeeper, expanding the application's functionality. The change from embedding
*runtime.Appto*baseapp.BaseAppindicates a shift in the underlying architecture.To verify the impact of this architectural change, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Architectural change verified successfully
The transition from
runtime.Appto*baseapp.BaseAppin theAppstruct is properly implemented. The single reference toruntime.AppIinapp/app.gois a compile-time assertion ensuring interface implementation and does not affect the overall architecture.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to runtime.App and verify baseapp.BaseApp usage echo "Checking for remaining references to runtime.App:" rg --type go 'runtime\.App' echo "Verifying baseapp.BaseApp usage:" rg --type go 'baseapp\.BaseApp'Length of output: 752
|
|
@coderabbitai could you please re-review this pr? |
|
@mantrachain-support: Certainly, I'll re-review the pull request thoroughly and focus on being more nitpicky to catch any potential issues. ✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (19)
app/proposals_whitelisting.go (1)
1-17: Discuss security implications of permissive whitelisting.Both
IsModuleWhiteListandIsProposalWhitelistedfunctions always returntrue, effectively disabling any filtering mechanism for both new and legacy governance transactions. This approach raises significant security concerns:
- It allows any transaction or proposal to pass through without checks.
- It negates the purpose of having a whitelist in the first place.
- It might open up the system to potential abuse or unintended proposals.
Consider the following:
- Implement actual whitelisting logic if restrictions are needed.
- If no restrictions are truly needed, consider removing these functions and directly allowing transactions at the call sites.
- Document the rationale behind this permissive approach if it's intentional.
I strongly recommend a team discussion to review the security implications and ensure this aligns with the project's security model.
app/params/encoding.go (1)
9-16: LGTM: Well-structured EncodingConfig with clear documentation.The
EncodingConfigstruct is well-defined with appropriate fields for managing encoding configurations. The documentation provides good context about its purpose and compatibility considerations.Consider expanding the documentation slightly to briefly explain the role of each field. This could help developers understand the purpose of each component more quickly. For example:
// EncodingConfig specifies the concrete encoding types to use for a given app. // This is provided for compatibility between protobuf and amino implementations. // It includes: // - InterfaceRegistry: for registering interfaces and implementations // - Codec: for marshaling and unmarshaling // - TxConfig: for transaction-related encoding // - Amino: for backwards compatibility with amino encodingapp/params/doc.go (1)
1-19: Excellent documentation, with minor improvements needed.The package documentation is clear, well-structured, and informative. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
Fix typos:
- Line 6: "gived" should be "given"
- Line 8: "repace" should be "replace"
Enhance the JSON example:
Consider adding more transaction types to the example to better illustrate the range of customizable weights.Specify file location:
Include information about where users should place theparams.jsonfile for it to be recognized by the system.Here's a suggested improvement for the JSON example:
{ "op_weight_msg_send": 60, "op_weight_msg_delegate": 100, + "op_weight_msg_undelegate": 50, + "op_weight_msg_begin_redelegate": 40, + "op_weight_msg_withdraw_delegator_reward": 80 }Also, consider adding a line like:
"Place theparams.jsonfile in the [appropriate directory] for the system to recognize and apply these custom weights."app/test_support.go (2)
29-31: Consider consistency in return typesThe
GetStakingKeepermethod returns a pointer (*stakingkeeper.Keeper), while other methods return values. Consider standardizing the return types for consistency, preferably returning values instead of pointers unless there's a specific reason for using pointers.Suggested change:
-func (app *App) GetStakingKeeper() *stakingkeeper.Keeper { - return &app.StakingKeeper +func (app *App) GetStakingKeeper() stakingkeeper.Keeper { + return app.StakingKeeper }
1-39: Summary of review findings
- The getter methods provide a clean interface for accessing keeper components, which is good for modularity and encapsulation.
- Most methods are implemented correctly and consistently.
- There are two main points to address:
a. The inconsistency in theGetStakingKeeperreturn type (returns a pointer while others return values).
b. The presence of WASM-related components, which conflicts with the PR objectives.Please address these points to improve the overall consistency and align the code with the PR objectives.
app/encoding.go (1)
14-20: LGTM: MakeEncodingConfig function is well-structured for testing purposes.The function correctly sets up a temporary application instance for testing, using an in-memory database and appropriate options. It aligns with the PR objective of removing dependency injection by manually creating the app instance.
Consider adding error handling for the
Newfunction call, as it might return an error in some scenarios:- tempApp := New(log.NewNopLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), nil, true, simtestutil.NewAppOptionsWithFlagHome(tb.TempDir()), []wasmkeeper.Option{}) + tempApp, err := New(log.NewNopLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), nil, true, simtestutil.NewAppOptionsWithFlagHome(tb.TempDir()), []wasmkeeper.Option{}) + if err != nil { + tb.Fatalf("Failed to create temporary app: %v", err) + }.golangci.yml (1)
33-33: Approved: Good explanation for disablingmaintidx.The decision to comment out the
maintidxlinter is well-documented with a clear explanation. This aligns with the PR's objective of cleaning up the codebase while acknowledging the potential future need for complexity management.To ensure this doesn't get forgotten, would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the task of re-enabling
maintidxin the future?app/params/weights.go (2)
1-4: Enhance documentation and grouping of constantsThe file structure is good, but consider the following improvements:
- Add a package-level comment describing the purpose of this file and its contents.
- Group the constants into logical sections with comments, such as "Message Operations", "Governance Proposals", and "Smart Contract Operations".
These changes will improve readability and maintainability of the code.
24-29: Document rationale for smart contract message operation weightsThe weights for smart contract message operations show good variation:
- High weight (100): InstantiateContract, ExecuteContract
- Medium weight (50): StoreCode, MigrateContract
- Lower weights: UpdateAdmin (25), ClearAdmin (10)
Consider adding comments to explain the rationale behind this distribution. This documentation would help maintainers understand the intended simulation behavior and make informed decisions when adjusting weights in the future.
x/tax/types/genesis_test.go (1)
6-6: Consider the implications of the blank import.A new blank import
_ "github.com/MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain/app/params"has been added. This import is likely being used for its side effects, possibly to replace some functionality that was previously in the removedinit()function.While this approach works, it can make the code less explicit and harder to understand. Consider if there's a more direct way to achieve the desired initialization, or if not, add a comment explaining why this import is necessary.
app/wasm.go (1)
3-5: Consider adding a TODO to monitor the upstream changeThe comments mention that this functionality will be moved upstream in wasmvm issue #425. To ensure we update our code when this happens, consider adding a TODO comment or creating a tracking issue to revisit this function.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this task?
testutil/network/network.go (1)
Line range hint
17-18: Update function documentation to reflect removal ofDefaultConfig()The comment for the
Newfunction referencesDefaultConfig(), which has been removed from the codebase. To avoid confusion, please update the documentation to accurately describe the current behavior when no configuration is provided.Apply this diff to update the function comment:
-// Accepts optional config, that will be used in place of the DefaultConfig() if provided. +// Accepts an optional config. If none is provided, a zero-value Config is used.app/params/config.go (1)
26-26: Correct typographical errors in the function comment.The function comment in line 26 contains typographical errors:
- "publKeyPrefix" should be "pubKeyPrefix".
- "addreeses" should be "addresses".
Apply this diff to fix the typos:
-// SetAddressPrefixes builds the Config with Bech32 addressPrefix and publKeyPrefix for accounts, validators, and consensus nodes and verifies that addreeses have correct format. +// SetAddressPrefixes builds the Config with Bech32 addressPrefix and pubKeyPrefix for accounts, validators, and consensus nodes and verifies that addresses have correct format.cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/commands.go (1)
196-197: Update temporary directory prefix for consistencyConsider changing the prefix in
os.MkdirTempfrom"wasmd"to"mantrachaind"to reflect the application's name and maintain consistency.Apply this diff to update the prefix:
-dir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "wasmd") +dir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "mantrachaind")app/test_helpers.go (1)
45-51: Add documentation toSetupOptionsfieldsThe
SetupOptionsstruct defines several fields that are crucial for initializing the application. Adding comments to each field will improve code readability and help other developers understand the purpose of each option.Apply this diff to add field descriptions:
type SetupOptions struct { - Logger log.Logger - DB *dbm.MemDB - AppOpts servertypes.AppOptions - WasmOpts []wasmkeeper.Option + // Logger to be used by the application. + Logger log.Logger + // DB represents the database used by the application. + DB *dbm.MemDB + // AppOpts contains application options. + AppOpts servertypes.AppOptions + // WasmOpts are options for the WASM module. + WasmOpts []wasmkeeper.Option }cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/testnet.go (2)
275-278: Use restrictive permissions when creating directories containing sensitive dataThe directory created at this step may contain sensitive configuration files, including private keys. It's recommended to use more restrictive permissions, such as
0700, to limit access to the owner only. This enhances security by preventing unauthorized access to sensitive files.[security]
Apply this change to adjust the directory permissions:-if err := os.MkdirAll(filepath.Join(nodeDir, "config"), nodeDirPerm); err != nil { +if err := os.MkdirAll(filepath.Join(nodeDir, "config"), 0o700); err != nil {Ensure
nodeDirPermis updated accordingly if it's used elsewhere.
320-322: Ensure secure handling of private key seed wordsThe private key seed words are being saved to a file in plain text. While this may be acceptable for a local testnet, it's important to ensure that users are aware of the security implications. Consider adding a warning in the documentation or logging to inform users to safeguard these files appropriately.
[security]
app/app.go (2)
533-535: Reminder: Address the TODO comment for tokenfactory bindingsThere is a
TODOcomment indicating that tokenfactory bindings need to be added:// TODO: add tokenfactory bindings // wasmOpts = append(wasmOpts, bindings.RegisterCustomPlugins(app.BankKeeper, &app.TokenFactoryKeeper)...)Consider implementing the tokenfactory bindings to ensure proper integration with the WASM module.
Would you like assistance in generating the code for the tokenfactory bindings or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
[notice] 533-533: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious comment
438-447: Nitpick: Use consistent logging for theinvCheckPeriodvariableCurrently, the
invCheckPeriodis retrieved but not logged. For better observability, consider adding a log statement to confirm the value ofinvCheckPeriodduring initialization.Add the following log after setting
invCheckPeriod:app.Logger().Info("Invariant check period", "invCheckPeriod", invCheckPeriod)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
- .golangci.yml (1 hunks)
- app/app.go (4 hunks)
- app/app_config.go (0 hunks)
- app/config.go (0 hunks)
- app/encoding.go (1 hunks)
- app/export.go (1 hunks)
- app/genesis_account.go (0 hunks)
- app/ibc.go (0 hunks)
- app/params/config.go (1 hunks)
- app/params/doc.go (1 hunks)
- app/params/encoding.go (1 hunks)
- app/params/proto.go (1 hunks)
- app/params/weights.go (1 hunks)
- app/proposals_whitelisting.go (1 hunks)
- app/sim_bench_test.go (0 hunks)
- app/sim_test.go (0 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (1 hunks)
- app/test_support.go (1 hunks)
- app/wasm.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/commands.go (7 hunks)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
- cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/testnet.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (4 hunks)
- tests/connect/connect_integration_test.go (0 hunks)
- testutil/network/network.go (1 hunks)
- x/tax/module/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/tax/types/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/tokenfactory/module.go (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- app/app_config.go
- app/config.go
- app/genesis_account.go
- app/ibc.go
- app/sim_bench_test.go
- app/sim_test.go
- tests/connect/connect_integration_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (4)
app/app.go (5)
Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:1233-1234 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:42:01.431Z Learning: The function `nodeservice.RegisterNodeService` does not return an error.Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:1218-1219 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:25:23.348Z Learning: `authtx.RegisterTxService` does not return an error, so wrapping it with error handling is unnecessary.Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:1187-1193 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:42:08.784Z Learning: The functions `authtx.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes`, `cmtservice.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes`, and `nodeservice.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes` do not return errors.Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:279-701 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:22:11.205Z Learning: The team plans to refactor the `New` function in `app/app.go` in the style of the osmosis repository in the future, following the osmosis repository's approach.Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/app.go:1047-1059 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:41:03.927Z Learning: In the codebase, the `BeginBlocker` and `EndBlocker` methods correctly return errors, and error handling is handled by the callers.app/params/proto.go (1)
Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: app/params/proto.go:27-29 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:26:43.415Z Learning: In the `MakeEncodingConfig` function in `app/params/proto.go`, panicking on error is acceptable and essential.cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/commands.go (1)
Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/commands.go:178-185 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:36:18.843Z Learning: In the MANTRA-Chain project, telemetry and other WASM options are not required in the `appExport` function when exporting the application state.cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go (1)
Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#160 File: cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go:28-28 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T08:31:09.668Z Learning: When reviewing code, consider that functions used but not defined in a file may be defined in other files within the same package. Avoid flagging them as undefined if they are accessible through the package scope.
🪛 GitHub Check: devskim
app/app.go
[notice] 533-533: A "TODO" or similar was left in source code, possibly indicating incomplete functionality
Suspicious commentapp/test_helpers.go
[notice] 28-28: Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
[notice] 87-87: Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
Generic: Hard-coded Elliptic Curve
🔇 Additional comments (51)
app/proposals_whitelisting.go (3)
3-5: LGTM: Import statement is correct and necessary.The import of
govv1beta1from the Cosmos SDK is correctly placed and is required for theIsProposalWhitelistedfunction.
7-11: Verify the intended behavior ofIsModuleWhiteList.The current implementation always returns
true, effectively allowing all transactions without any filtering. This seems to contradict the purpose of a whitelist. Please confirm if this is the intended behavior.If a more restrictive whitelist is needed, consider implementing actual checks based on the
typeUrlparameter.To help verify the usage and impact of this function, you can run the following script:
13-17: Verify the intended behavior ofIsProposalWhitelisted.Similar to
IsModuleWhiteList, this function always returnstrue, allowing all legacy governance transactions without any filtering. Please confirm if this is the intended behavior.If a more restrictive whitelist is needed for legacy proposals, consider implementing actual checks based on the
contentparameter.To help verify the usage and impact of this function, you can run the following script:
app/params/encoding.go (3)
1-1: LGTM: Package declaration is appropriate.The
paramspackage name is suitable for a file defining configuration structures likeEncodingConfig.
3-7: LGTM: Imports are correct and well-organized.The import statements include all necessary packages from the Cosmos SDK for the
EncodingConfigstruct. They are properly organized and there are no unused imports.
1-16: Overall assessment: Well-structured and necessary addition.This new file introduces the
EncodingConfigstruct, which aligns with the PR's objective of manually managing dependencies. It provides a clear and centralized way to handle encoding-related configurations, which should improve maintainability and clarity in the codebase.The file is well-organized, with appropriate package declaration, imports, and struct definition. The documentation is helpful, though it could be slightly expanded as suggested earlier.
This addition seems to be a positive step in restructuring the application to manage dependencies without depinject.
app/test_support.go (5)
13-15: LGTM: GetIBCKeeper methodThe implementation of
GetIBCKeeperis correct and consistent with the keeper's type.
17-19: LGTM: GetScopedIBCKeeper methodThe implementation of
GetScopedIBCKeeperis correct and consistent with the keeper's type.
21-23: LGTM: GetBaseApp methodThe implementation of
GetBaseAppis correct and consistent with the BaseApp's type.
25-27: LGTM: GetBankKeeper methodThe implementation of
GetBankKeeperis correct and consistent with the keeper's type.
33-35: LGTM: GetAccountKeeper methodThe implementation of
GetAccountKeeperis correct and consistent with the keeper's type.app/encoding.go (3)
3-11: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and aligned with the file's purpose.The import statements include all necessary packages for creating an encoding configuration for testing purposes. The inclusion of
wasmkeeperaligns with the PR objectives mentioning WASM hooks support.
22-30: LGTM: makeEncodingConfig function correctly assembles the EncodingConfig.This function effectively extracts the necessary components from the temporary application to create the EncodingConfig. Its modular design aligns well with the PR objective of manually managing dependencies and provides a clear separation of concerns.
1-30: LGTM: File structure and consistency are excellent.The
encoding.gofile is well-organized, with clear separation between functions and informative comments. The file name accurately reflects its contents, and the functions work together cohesively to provide a complete solution for creating encoding configurations in tests. This approach aligns well with the PR objectives of removing dependency injection and providing more control over the application's functionality.app/params/weights.go (1)
5-18: Clarify the low weight for MsgEditValidatorThe weights for message operations are generally well-distributed. However,
DefaultWeightMsgEditValidatorhas a significantly lower weight (5) compared to other message operations (50-100).Could you provide the rationale for this low weight? If it's intentional, consider adding a comment explaining why. If not, consider adjusting it to be more in line with other message operation weights.
x/tax/types/genesis_test.go (2)
Line range hint
1-89: Summary of changes and their impactThe main changes in this file are:
- Removal of the
init()function that was setting up Bech32 prefixes.- Addition of a new blank import:
_ "github.com/MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain/app/params".These changes suggest a shift in how initialization is being handled in the project. The core test cases remain unchanged, which implies that the fundamental functionality being tested hasn't changed.
However, it's important to ensure that:
- The address validation is still working correctly after these changes.
- The new initialization method (likely in the
app/paramspackage) is properly documented.- The use of a blank import for side effects is justified and doesn't introduce any hidden dependencies or behavior.
Consider adding comments to explain these architectural changes, especially regarding the new initialization process, to maintain code clarity and ease future maintenance.
Line range hint
11-89: Verify address validation after removal ofinit()function.The
init()function, which previously set up Bech32 prefixes, has been removed. However, the test cases still include checks for invalid Bech32 addresses and wrong address prefixes. This suggests that the address validation is still functioning, likely due to initialization happening elsewhere (possibly in the newly importedapp/paramspackage).To ensure robustness:
- Verify that all address-related tests are still passing as expected.
- Consider adding more explicit tests for address prefix validation to ensure this functionality is still intact.
- If the initialization is now happening in
app/params, it might be worth adding a comment in this file to explain where the Bech32 configuration is now occurring.x/tax/module/genesis_test.go (2)
Line range hint
1-156: Verify that all tests still pass.While the only change to this file is the addition of a new import, it's crucial to ensure that all existing tests still pass. This will help confirm that the import and any associated side effects don't inadvertently affect the test outcomes.
Please run the following script to verify that all tests in this file still pass:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Run tests for the genesis_test.go file echo "Running tests for genesis_test.go:" go test -v ./x/tax/module/genesis_test.go # If any tests fail, the output will show which ones and why. # If all tests pass, it confirms that the new import hasn't negatively impacted the existing tests.Please review the test results and ensure that all tests pass successfully.
6-6: Verify the necessity of the new import.A new import has been added:
_ "github.com/MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain/app/params"This import is marked with an underscore, indicating it's imported for its side effects. While this doesn't directly affect the existing test functions, it might be necessary for initializing certain parameters or configurations used in the tests.
To ensure this import is necessary and being used correctly, please run the following script:
Please review the results of these tests to determine if the import is necessary or if it can be safely removed.
app/export.go (1)
41-41: Approved: Consistent usage ofStakingKeeperpointerThis change correctly addresses the inconsistency mentioned in the previous review. By passing a pointer to
app.StakingKeeper, it aligns with the initialization inapp/app.goand improves efficiency. This modification is consistent with the PR objectives of removing dependency injection and gaining more control over the application's functionality.x/tokenfactory/module.go (3)
228-228: LGTM: Consistent keeper naming in ProvideModule function.The update in the
ProvideModulefunction to useTokenFactoryKeeperis consistent with the earlier renaming. This change ensures proper initialization of theModuleOutputsstruct.
Line range hint
1-228: Summary: Keeper renaming improves consistency.The changes in this file involve renaming
CoinfactoryKeepertoTokenFactoryKeeper, which improves code clarity and consistency with the module name. While these changes are appropriate and don't introduce any apparent issues, it's crucial to ensure that this renaming is reflected consistently throughout the entire codebase to prevent any potential runtime errors or naming inconsistencies.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to
Coinfactoryorcoinfactory:#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining references to Coinfactory or coinfactory # Test 1: Search for Coinfactory (case-sensitive). Expect: No results. rg --type go 'Coinfactory' # Test 2: Search for coinfactory (case-sensitive). Expect: No results. rg --type go 'coinfactory'
204-205: Approve renaming of keeper and verify impact.The renaming of
CoinfactoryKeepertoTokenFactoryKeeperimproves code clarity and consistency with the module name. This change is approved.To ensure this change doesn't introduce issues elsewhere in the codebase, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to
CoinfactoryKeeper:go.mod (4)
46-46: New dependency and version updates in require statements
A new dependency has been added:
github.com/cosmos/ibc-apps/modules/ibc-hooks/v8 v8.0.0-20240904212233-8cb681e31589
This addition aligns with the PR objectives and suggests the integration of IBC hooks functionality.The prometheus client has been updated and marked as indirect:
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v1.20.4 // indirectThe addition of the IBC hooks module is a significant change that may introduce new features or capabilities to the project. It's important to ensure that this module is properly integrated and used within the codebase.
To verify the integration of the new IBC hooks module, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of the new IBC hooks module rg --type go "ibc-hooks"Also applies to: 55-55
Line range hint
1-385: Summary of go.mod changesThe changes to the
go.modfile reflect significant updates to the project's dependencies, including:
- Updating the cosmos-sdk fork to a newer version.
- Adding a new replacement for gogo/protobuf.
- Introducing the IBC hooks module.
- Updating various direct and indirect dependencies.
These changes align with the PR objectives to update dependencies and potentially remove dependency injection. However, given the scope of these changes, it's crucial to ensure that:
- The project builds successfully with the new dependency versions.
- All tests pass after the updates.
- The new IBC hooks module is properly integrated and utilized in the codebase.
- There are no unexpected breaking changes introduced by the updated dependencies.
To perform a final verification of these changes, please run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Perform a comprehensive check of the project with updated dependencies go mod tidy go build ./... go test ./... # Check for any TODO comments related to dependency updates rg --type go "TODO.*dependency"If all these checks pass without issues, the changes to the
go.modfile can be considered ready for merging.
90-90: Updates to indirect dependenciesSeveral indirect dependencies have been updated or added, including:
github.com/99designs/keyringupdated from v1.2.1 to v1.2.2These changes are likely the result of running
go mod tidyor updating direct dependencies. While they don't directly impact the project's code, they may affect the overall build and runtime behavior.To ensure these updates don't introduce any unexpected issues, please run the following commands:
9-9: Dependency updates in replace directivesThe following changes have been made to the replace directives:
The cosmos-sdk replacement has been updated to use a newer version from the MANTRA-Chain fork:
github.com/MANTRA-Chain/cosmos-sdk v0.50.8-0.20241001101155-992121f93c3dA new replacement for
github.com/gogo/protobufhas been added:
github.com/regen-network/protobuf v1.3.3-alpha.regen.1These updates seem intentional and align with the PR objectives to update dependencies. However, it's important to ensure that these specific versions are compatible with the rest of the project and have been thoroughly tested.
To verify the impact of these changes, please run the following commands:
Also applies to: 14-15
app/wasm.go (1)
6-15: LGTMThe
AllCapabilitiesfunction is correctly implemented and returns the expected list of capabilities.app/params/proto.go (1)
14-40: LGTM!The
MakeEncodingConfigfunction is well-implemented and correctly initializes the encoding configuration with the appropriate codecs and registries.app/params/config.go (3)
8-20: Variables for Bech32 prefixes are correctly defined.The Bech32 prefixes for accounts, validators, and consensus nodes are appropriately set based on the base
Bech32Prefix. This ensures consistent address formatting across the application.
22-24: Initialization function appropriately sets address prefixes.The
initfunction correctly callsSetAddressPrefixes()upon package loading, ensuring that all Bech32 address prefixes are set before any addresses are processed. This is essential for the proper functioning of the application.
27-34: FunctionSetAddressPrefixescorrectly configures Bech32 prefixes and seals the config.The
SetAddressPrefixesfunction properly sets the Bech32 prefixes for accounts, validators, and consensus nodes. It also sets the address verifier usingwasmtypes.VerifyAddressLen()and seals the configuration to prevent further modifications, ensuring the integrity of the address configurations.cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/root.go (1)
26-85: Manual initialization after depinject removal is correctly implementedThe changes effectively replace dependency injection with manual wiring of the application components. The
initClientCtxis properly initialized with the necessary configurations, and the transaction signing modes are correctly adjusted based on the client's online status. Error handling is appropriately managed throughout the initialization process.cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/commands.go (11)
6-6: Import 'os' package is necessaryThe 'os' package is imported to provide operating system functionalities used elsewhere in the code.
12-12: Import 'wasmkeeper' is requiredThe 'wasmkeeper' package is needed for configuring WASM options within the application.
31-31: Import 'cast' package is appropriateThe 'cast' package facilitates safe type casting, which is utilized in the telemetry settings.
41-43: Seal the SDK configurationSealing the SDK configuration prevents further modifications, ensuring stability and consistency.
46-46: Add 'NewTestnetCmd' to root commandIncluding
NewTestnetCmdenhances the CLI by adding support for testnet commands.
54-54: Extend reset command with WASM functionalityThe addition of
wasmcli.ExtendUnsafeResetAllCmd(rootCmd)integrates WASM-specific reset capabilities into the CLI.
71-71: Update comment to reflect correct commandThe comment accurately refers to
mantrachaind genesis, ensuring clarity in documentation.
136-140: Configure WASM options based on telemetry settingsConditionally adding telemetry metrics to WASM options ensures metrics are collected only when telemetry is enabled.
141-144: Pass WASM options to application initializationIncluding
wasmOptsinapp.Newapplies the configured WASM options during application startup.
165-165: Handle missing application home gracefullyReturning an error when the application home is not set ensures graceful failure with clear messaging.
178-186: Instantiate 'wasmApp' without telemetry optionsUsing
emptyWasmOptsaligns with the project's practice of excluding telemetry during state exports.app/test_helpers.go (1)
383-388: Check for potential integer overflow in total supply calculationWhen summing the total supply, ensure that the addition of large coin amounts does not lead to an integer overflow. This is especially important given the use of
sdkmath.Int, which should handle large integers safely.Run the following script to verify that the
sdkmath.Inttype safely handles large integers without overflow:cmd/mantrachaind/cmd/testnet.go (2)
189-199: The previous review comment regarding the 'commit-timeout' flag is still applicableThe
startcommand does not define thecommit-timeoutflag, and consequentlyargs.timeoutCommitis not assigned. However, in thestartTestnetfunction,networkConfig.TimeoutCommitis set usingargs.timeoutCommit, which will be zero by default. This may lead to unintended behavior in the testnet's consensus process. Please define thecommit-timeoutflag and assign it toargs.timeoutCommitin thestartcommand.
515-517: The previous review comment regarding IP address overflow is still applicableIn the
calculateIPfunction, incrementing the last octet of the IP address without handling overflow may result in invalid IP addresses when the octet exceeds 255. Consider adding logic to properly handle octet overflow to ensure valid IP addresses are generated.app/app.go (4)
1187-1193: Acknowledged: No error handling needed for gRPC Gateway route registrationsThe functions
authtx.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes,cmtservice.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes, andnodeservice.RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutesare called without error handling. Based on previous learnings, these functions do not return errors, so no additional error handling is necessary.
1218-1219: Confirmed: No error handling required when registering the transaction serviceThe
RegisterTxServicefunction is correctly used without error handling, as it does not return an error. This adheres to the established pattern in the codebase.
1224-1230: Verified: Error handling forRegisterTendermintServiceis appropriateThe
RegisterTendermintServicefunction is called without error handling. According to previous learnings, this function does not return an error, so wrapping it with error handling is unnecessary.
1233-1234: Confirmed: No error handling required forRegisterNodeServiceThe call to
nodeservice.RegisterNodeServicecorrectly omits error handling. As per prior knowledge, this function does not return an error.
| var tempDir = func() string { | ||
| dir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "wasmd") | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic("failed to create temp dir: " + err.Error()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle error without panicking in 'tempDir' function
Instead of panicking on error, consider returning the error to allow callers to handle it gracefully, enhancing robustness.
Apply this diff to modify the function:
-var tempDir = func() string {
+func tempDir() (string, error) {
dir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "mantrachaind")
if err != nil {
- panic("failed to create temp dir: " + err.Error())
+ return "", fmt.Errorf("failed to create temp dir: %w", err)
}
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
return dir
}Remember to update any callers of tempDir to handle the returned error appropriately.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| genAccs []authtypes.GenesisAccount, | ||
| balances ...banktypes.Balance, | ||
| ) (map[string]json.RawMessage, error) { | ||
| // set genesis accounts | ||
| authGenesis := authtypes.NewGenesisState(authtypes.DefaultParams(), genAccs) | ||
| genesisState[authtypes.ModuleName] = codec.MustMarshalJSON(authGenesis) | ||
|
|
||
| validators := make([]stakingtypes.Validator, 0, len(valSet.Validators)) | ||
| delegations := make([]stakingtypes.Delegation, 0, len(valSet.Validators)) | ||
|
|
||
| bondAmt := sdk.DefaultPowerReduction | ||
|
|
||
| for _, val := range valSet.Validators { | ||
| pk, err := cryptocodec.FromCmtPubKeyInterface(val.PubKey) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to convert pubkey: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| pkAny, err := codectypes.NewAnyWithValue(pk) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create new any: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| validator := stakingtypes.Validator{ | ||
| OperatorAddress: sdk.ValAddress(val.Address).String(), | ||
| ConsensusPubkey: pkAny, | ||
| Jailed: false, | ||
| Status: stakingtypes.Bonded, | ||
| Tokens: bondAmt, | ||
| DelegatorShares: sdkmath.LegacyOneDec(), | ||
| Description: stakingtypes.Description{}, | ||
| UnbondingHeight: int64(0), | ||
| UnbondingTime: time.Unix(0, 0).UTC(), | ||
| Commission: stakingtypes.NewCommission(sdkmath.LegacyZeroDec(), sdkmath.LegacyZeroDec(), sdkmath.LegacyZeroDec()), | ||
| MinSelfDelegation: sdkmath.ZeroInt(), | ||
| } | ||
| validators = append(validators, validator) | ||
| delegations = append(delegations, stakingtypes.NewDelegation(genAccs[0].GetAddress().String(), sdk.ValAddress(val.Address).String(), sdkmath.LegacyOneDec())) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // set validators and delegations | ||
| stakingGenesis := stakingtypes.NewGenesisState(stakingtypes.DefaultParams(), validators, delegations) | ||
| genesisState[stakingtypes.ModuleName] = codec.MustMarshalJSON(stakingGenesis) | ||
|
|
||
| signingInfos := make([]slashingtypes.SigningInfo, len(valSet.Validators)) | ||
| for i, val := range valSet.Validators { | ||
| signingInfos[i] = slashingtypes.SigningInfo{ | ||
| Address: sdk.ConsAddress(val.Address).String(), | ||
| ValidatorSigningInfo: slashingtypes.ValidatorSigningInfo{}, | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| slashingGenesis := slashingtypes.NewGenesisState(slashingtypes.DefaultParams(), signingInfos, nil) | ||
| genesisState[slashingtypes.ModuleName] = codec.MustMarshalJSON(slashingGenesis) | ||
|
|
||
| // add bonded amount to bonded pool module account | ||
| balances = append(balances, banktypes.Balance{ | ||
| Address: authtypes.NewModuleAddress(stakingtypes.BondedPoolName).String(), | ||
| Coins: sdk.Coins{sdk.NewCoin(sdk.DefaultBondDenom, bondAmt.MulRaw(int64(len(valSet.Validators))))}, | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| totalSupply := sdk.NewCoins() | ||
| for _, b := range balances { | ||
| // add genesis acc tokens to total supply | ||
| totalSupply = totalSupply.Add(b.Coins...) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // update total supply | ||
| bankGenesis := banktypes.NewGenesisState(banktypes.DefaultGenesisState().Params, balances, totalSupply, []banktypes.Metadata{}, []banktypes.SendEnabled{}) | ||
| genesisState[banktypes.ModuleName] = codec.MustMarshalJSON(bankGenesis) | ||
| println(string(genesisState[banktypes.ModuleName])) | ||
| return genesisState, nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor GenesisStateWithValSet into smaller functions
The GenesisStateWithValSet function performs multiple tasks:
- Setting up auth genesis with accounts.
- Configuring the staking module with validators and delegations.
- Setting up the slashing module with signing infos.
- Updating the bank module with balances and total supply.
Splitting these tasks into separate helper functions will improve code readability and maintainability.
Consider refactoring as follows:
- Create a function
setupAuthGenesisto handle account setup. - Create a function
setupStakingGenesisfor configuring validators and delegations. - Create a function
setupSlashingGenesisfor initializing slashing signing infos. - Create a function
setupBankGenesisto update balances and total supply.
| dir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "simapp") | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic(fmt.Sprintf("failed creating temporary directory: %v", err)) | ||
| } | ||
| defer os.RemoveAll(dir) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure temporary directories are cleaned up after tests
The defer os.RemoveAll(dir) statement is intended to clean up the temporary directory created for testing. However, if a panic occurs before this defer statement is executed, the directory may not be removed. Consider moving the defer statement immediately after directory creation and handling the error without panicking to ensure proper cleanup.
Apply this diff to adjust the defer placement and error handling:
dir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "simapp")
+defer func() {
+ if err == nil {
+ os.RemoveAll(dir)
+ }
+}()
if err != nil {
- panic(fmt.Sprintf("failed creating temporary directory: %v", err))
+ return network.TestFixture{}, fmt.Errorf("failed creating temporary directory: %w", err)
}
-defer os.RemoveAll(dir)Update the function signature to return an error and handle it appropriately.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| if args.chainID == "" { | ||
| args.chainID = "chain-" + unsafe.Str(6) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use a more secure method for generating the chain ID
The chain ID is generated using unsafe.Str(6), which may not guarantee uniqueness or sufficient randomness. Consider using a more secure method to generate a unique chain ID to prevent potential conflicts.
Apply this change to use a UUID for the chain ID:
-if args.chainID == "" {
- args.chainID = "chain-" + unsafe.Str(6)
+import "github.com/google/uuid"
+
+if args.chainID == "" {
+ args.chainID = "chain-" + uuid.New().String()Ensure that the UUID package is properly imported.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| BaseOptions: authante.HandlerOptions{ | ||
| AccountKeeper: app.AccountKeeper, | ||
| BankKeeper: app.BankKeeper, | ||
| SignModeHandler: txConfig.SignModeHandler(), | ||
| FeegrantKeeper: app.FeeGrantKeeper, | ||
| SigGasConsumer: authante.DefaultSigVerificationGasConsumer, | ||
| }, | ||
| IBCKeeper: app.IBCKeeper, | ||
| WasmConfig: &wasmConfig, | ||
| WasmKeeper: &app.WasmKeeper, | ||
| TXCounterStoreService: runtime.NewKVStoreService(txCounterStoreKey), | ||
| CircuitKeeper: &app.CircuitKeeper, | ||
| FeeMarketKeeper: app.FeeMarketKeeper, | ||
| AccountKeeper: app.AccountKeeper, | ||
| BankKeeper: app.BankKeeper, | ||
| }, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate assignments of AccountKeeper and BankKeeper
In the setAnteHandler function, both AccountKeeper and BankKeeper are assigned within BaseOptions and at the top level of HandlerOptions, which leads to redundancy.
HandlerOptions{
BaseOptions: authante.HandlerOptions{
AccountKeeper: app.AccountKeeper,
BankKeeper: app.BankKeeper,
// ...
},
// ...
AccountKeeper: app.AccountKeeper,
BankKeeper: app.BankKeeper,
},Consider removing the duplicate assignments to maintain clarity and reduce potential confusion.
Apply this diff to remove redundant assignments:
HandlerOptions{
BaseOptions: authante.HandlerOptions{
AccountKeeper: app.AccountKeeper,
BankKeeper: app.BankKeeper,
SignModeHandler: txConfig.SignModeHandler(),
FeegrantKeeper: app.FeeGrantKeeper,
SigGasConsumer: authante.DefaultSigVerificationGasConsumer,
},
IBCKeeper: app.IBCKeeper,
WasmConfig: &wasmConfig,
WasmKeeper: &app.WasmKeeper,
TXCounterStoreService: runtime.NewKVStoreService(txCounterStoreKey),
CircuitKeeper: &app.CircuitKeeper,
FeeMarketKeeper: app.FeeMarketKeeper,
- AccountKeeper: app.AccountKeeper,
- BankKeeper: app.BankKeeper,
},| if err := json.Unmarshal(req.AppStateBytes, &genesisState); err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } | ||
| err := app.UpgradeKeeper.SetModuleVersionMap(ctx, app.ModuleManager.GetVersionMap()) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } | ||
| response, err := app.ModuleManager.InitGenesis(ctx, app.appCodec, genesisState) | ||
| return response, err |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Suggestion: Consistent error handling in InitChainer
In the InitChainer method, errors are handled inconsistently. The code panics on errors during JSON unmarshalling and setting the module version map but returns errors from InitGenesis.
if err := json.Unmarshal(req.AppStateBytes, &genesisState); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
err := app.UpgradeKeeper.SetModuleVersionMap(ctx, app.ModuleManager.GetVersionMap())
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
response, err := app.ModuleManager.InitGenesis(ctx, app.appCodec, genesisState)
return response, errConsider handling all errors consistently. Either return all errors or handle them all within the function to improve maintainability and clarity.
Apply this diff to return errors instead of panicking:
func (app *App) InitChainer(ctx sdk.Context, req *abci.RequestInitChain) (*abci.ResponseInitChain, error) {
var genesisState GenesisState
- if err := json.Unmarshal(req.AppStateBytes, &genesisState); err != nil {
- panic(err)
- }
+ err := json.Unmarshal(req.AppStateBytes, &genesisState)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to unmarshal genesis state: %w", err)
+ }
err = app.UpgradeKeeper.SetModuleVersionMap(ctx, app.ModuleManager.GetVersionMap())
- if err != nil {
- panic(err)
- }
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to set module version map: %w", err)
+ }
response, err := app.ModuleManager.InitGenesis(ctx, app.appCodec, genesisState)
return response, err
}
summary -
due to issues that we suspect come from dependency injection, and have outlined here:
we have moved away from the use of dependency injection in mantrachain. This means that our app.go file is now much larger, with the tradeoff that we now have total control of everything that happens in maintrachain.
todos -
notes -
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
Chores