govulncheck #33
govulncheck #33
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mantrachain Development Support <[email protected]>
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file named Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Signed-off-by: Mantrachain Development Support <[email protected]>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml
|
@coderabbitai what does this mean? 2024/09/07 14:42:59 internal error: package "github.com/cometbft/cometbft-db" without types was imported from "github.com/cometbft/cometbft/config" |
|
Oops, something went wrong! Please try again later. 🐰 💔 |
|
https://github.com/coderabbitai what does this mean? 2024/09/07 14:42:59 internal error: package "github.com/cometbft/cometbft-db" without types was imported from "github.com/cometbft/cometbft/config" |
|
2024/09/21 13:04:11 internal error: package "golang.org/x/exp/constraints" without types was imported from "cosmossdk.io/depinject/internal/util" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (2)
3-6: Job configuration looks good!The job is well-defined with a clear name and runs on the latest Ubuntu version, which is ideal for security scanning tasks.
1-12: Overall, this is a valuable addition to the project's security practices.The introduction of this govulncheck workflow is a positive step towards enhancing the security of your Go project. It will help identify vulnerabilities in your Go packages automatically.
With the suggested improvements (running on pull requests, adding a checkout step, and using the latest patch version of the action), this workflow will be even more effective in catching potential security issues early in the development process.
Great job on prioritizing security! This workflow will contribute significantly to maintaining the integrity and safety of your codebase.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Mantrachain Development Support <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mantrachain Development Support <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (2)
11-16: Minor improvements for govulncheck action configuration.The govulncheck action is correctly set up, but there are two minor suggestions for improvement:
- Fix the indentation on line 15 for consistency.
- Consider using a more specific version of the action for better reproducibility.
Here's a suggested modification:
steps: - id: govulncheck - uses: golang/govulncheck-action@v1 + uses: golang/[email protected] with: - go-package: ./... - check-latest: true + go-package: ./... + check-latest: trueThis change fixes the indentation and updates the govulncheck action to the latest patch version (as of the current date). Remember to periodically check for new versions of the action to ensure you're using the most up-to-date and secure version.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 15-15: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 11
(indentation)
6-6: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces on line 6. While they don't affect functionality, it's a good practice to remove them for cleanliness and to avoid potential issues in some systems.
Here's the suggested change:
- +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 6-6: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#33 File: .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml:7-12 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T09:17:52.168Z Learning: The govulncheck GitHub Action (golang/govulncheck-action) automatically checks out the repository code, so a separate checkout step is not necessary..github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (1)
Learnt from: mantrachain-support PR: MANTRA-Chain/mantrachain#33 File: .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml:7-12 Timestamp: 2024-10-02T09:17:52.168Z Learning: The govulncheck GitHub Action (golang/govulncheck-action) automatically checks out the repository code, so a separate checkout step is not necessary.
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/govulncheck.yml
[error] 6-6: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 15-15: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 11
(indentation)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (3)
1-5: LGTM: Workflow triggers are well-configured.The workflow is correctly set up to trigger on both push and pull request events to the main branch. This configuration allows for proactive vulnerability detection, which is a best practice for maintaining code security.
7-10: LGTM: Job definition and setup are correct.The job is properly defined with a clear name and is set to run on the latest Ubuntu version, which is a good practice for ensuring up-to-date dependencies and security patches.
1-16: Overall, the govulncheck workflow is well-implemented.The workflow is correctly set up to run govulncheck on both push and pull request events, which is a great practice for maintaining code security. The suggested improvements are minor and mainly focus on code style and version specificity. Once these small changes are applied, the workflow will be in excellent shape to help identify potential vulnerabilities in your Go packages.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 6-6: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 15-15: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 11
(indentation)
|
@AaronForce1 - this is another PR that isn't automerging correctly |
|
Summary by CodeRabbit