-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 317
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix recipe docs #1448
Fix recipe docs #1448
Conversation
`argument_names(::Type{<: MyPlot}) = (:x, :y, :z)` | ||
```julia | ||
argument_names(::Type{<: MyPlot}) = (:x, :y, :z) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
This is optional but it will allow the use of `plot_object[:x]` to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Later on in the stocks example, the arguments are fetched like plot_object.x
. Is both supported or should the above be changed to match the example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer plot.x
and would like to deprecate plot[:x]
at some point, or change its meaning...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should I change this in the docs to bridge the gap while you are working on the overhaul? I couldn't find where plot.x
get's wired into getproperty
, so I didn't feel comfortable doing the change right away. Here are some other occurences:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, somehow missed your comment... Yeah I think that's a good idea!
And then getproperty uses getindex here:
https://github.com/JuliaPlots/Makie.jl/blob/78820311c9b45347f0937caf8b31a25bbc27dd73/MakieCore/src/attributes.jl#L83
(Not very straightforward to find, especially with the Transformable
supertype)
Just found out about #771 and friends. So maybe this isn't needed anymore? |
No description provided.