Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch dataflow fragments to columnar #31186

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

antiguru
Copy link
Member

@antiguru antiguru commented Jan 24, 2025

Switch the specialized-arrange formation and the linear join preparation phase to use columnar data on dataflow edges.

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@antiguru antiguru requested review from aljoscha, jkosh44, a team and benesch as code owners January 24, 2025 19:25
@antiguru antiguru marked this pull request as draft January 24, 2025 19:25
@antiguru antiguru force-pushed the unary_faillable_columnar branch 3 times, most recently from efb30d7 to 704ddb1 Compare January 29, 2025 14:47
Change the dataflow fragment for `specialized_arrange` and in the linear
join preparation phase to use columnar data on edges.

Signed-off-by: Moritz Hoffmann <[email protected]>
@antiguru antiguru force-pushed the unary_faillable_columnar branch from 704ddb1 to f2e0782 Compare January 29, 2025 14:53
@antiguru antiguru marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 14:56
@antiguru antiguru requested review from teskje and frankmcsherry and removed request for a team, aljoscha, benesch and jkosh44 January 29, 2025 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant