Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potlock agent grant proposal #155

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Immanuel-john
Copy link

@Immanuel-john Immanuel-john commented Sep 27, 2024

Project Abstract

The PotLock AI Agent is an innovative solution designed to enhance user engagement and streamline the fundraising process on the PotLock platform. By leveraging AI technology, this agent provides users with an intuitive interface to view all listed projects, make donations, and create new project profiles seamlessly. Users can easily generate donation transactions, track their contributions, and monitor donations received for their own projects.

This integration with the NEAR blockchain ensures secure and efficient management of donations and project activities, fostering community support and collaboration. The PotLock AI Agent aims to democratize fundraising efforts, making it accessible for both project creators and donors. The project is fully developed and operational, with plans for continuous enhancement based on user feedback and emerging trends in the blockchain ecosystem.

For which grant level are you applying?

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $50,000, 3 approvals and one pitch to Mintbase Council
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals and mutliple pitches to Mintbase Council

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied, renamed ( project_name.md) and updated.
  • NEAR address for the payment of the milestones is provided inside the application.
  • I have read and acknowledged the terms and conditions.
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted.

How Did You Hear About our grants program?

  • Mintbase Website
  • Mintbase Community (Twitter, Discord, Telegram etc.)
  • Hackathon
  • Personal Recommendation
  • Investor/VC
  • Online Search
  • Other: _______

PR Type

documentation


Description

  • Added comprehensive documentation for the GFXvs AI Agent grant proposal, including project overview, team details, API specifications, and future plans.
  • Added comprehensive documentation for the PotLock AI Agent grant proposal, including project overview, team details, API specifications, and future plans.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Documentation
gfxvs-agent.md
Added GFXvs AI Agent Grant Proposal Documentation               

applications/gfxvs-agent.md

  • Added a new grant proposal for the GFXvs AI Agent.
  • Included project overview, team details, and development status.
  • Provided API specifications and endpoints for core functionalities.
  • Described future plans and ecosystem fit.
  • +112/-0 
    potlock-agent.md
    Added PotLock AI Agent Grant Proposal Documentation           

    applications/potlock-agent.md

  • Added a new grant proposal for the PotLock AI Agent.
  • Included project overview, team details, and development status.
  • Provided API specifications and endpoints for core functionalities.
  • Described future plans and ecosystem fit.
  • +158/-0 

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @mintbase-codium-pr-agent mintbase-codium-pr-agent bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Review effort [1-5]: 3 labels Sep 27, 2024
    @mintbase-codium-pr-agent
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Missing Documentation
    The proposal mentions that no additional documentation will be provided for core components, protocols, and architecture. This could hinder future development and maintenance efforts, and it's recommended to include at least basic documentation.

    Missing Documentation
    Similar to the GFXvs AI Agent, the proposal for the PotLock AI Agent also states that no additional documentation will be provided. This lack of documentation could pose challenges for scalability and understanding the project's technical aspects.

    @mintbase-codium-pr-agent
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Implement authentication for the API endpoints

    To enhance security and ensure data integrity, consider implementing authentication
    and authorization mechanisms for the API endpoints. This could involve using OAuth
    tokens or API keys.

    applications/potlock-agent.md [48-50]

     - **Endpoint:** `/api/donation`
     - **Method:** POST
     - **Summary:** Make a donation.
    +- **Authentication:** Required OAuth token or API key.
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: Implementing authentication and authorization mechanisms is essential for securing API endpoints and ensuring data integrity. This suggestion addresses a significant security concern.

    10
    Enhancement
    Add error handling responses to the API documentation

    It is recommended to include error handling information in the API documentation.
    This will help developers understand how to handle different scenarios when the API
    does not behave as expected.

    applications/gfxvs-agent.md [35]

     - **Responses:**
       - **200:** Image data uploaded successfully with details about the art, including `artistId`, `arttitle`, and `colouredArt`.
    +  - **400:** Bad request, required fields are missing.
    +  - **500:** Internal server error, please try again later.
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Including error handling information in API documentation is crucial for developers to manage different scenarios effectively. This suggestion enhances the robustness and usability of the API documentation.

    9
    Add examples to the API request and response documentation

    To improve the clarity and usability of the API, consider providing examples of
    request bodies and responses. This can help developers quickly understand how to use
    the API effectively.

    applications/gfxvs-agent.md [30-33]

     - **Request Body:**
    -  - **colouredArt:** The URL of the image (string).
    -  - **arttitle:** The title of the image (string).
    -  - **artistId:** User's account ID (string).
    +  - **colouredArt:** The URL of the image (string). Example: "http://example.com/image.jpg"
    +  - **arttitle:** The title of the image (string). Example: "Sunset Art"
    +  - **artistId:** User's account ID (string). Example: "user123"
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Providing examples in the API documentation improves clarity and usability, helping developers understand how to use the API more effectively. This is a valuable enhancement for developer experience.

    8
    Maintainability
    Rename the POST method endpoint to avoid confusion with the GET method endpoint

    To avoid redundancy and potential confusion, ensure that API endpoints are uniquely
    defined. The /api/project endpoint is defined twice with different methods. It's
    better to clarify this in the documentation.

    applications/potlock-agent.md [33-34]

    -- **Endpoint:** `/api/project`
    +- **Endpoint:** `/api/project/create`
     - **Method:** POST
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Clarifying API endpoint definitions by renaming them helps avoid redundancy and potential confusion, improving the maintainability of the documentation. This is a good practice for clear API documentation.

    7

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Review effort [1-5]: 3
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants