Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Group FONLL configuration by theory #131

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Group FONLL configuration by theory #131

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor

@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn commented Oct 19, 2023

Please tell me and @andreab1997 if you prefer this or the original #99

@RoyStegeman
Copy link
Member

Thanks, I'd say this is simpler and clearer so I'd prefer a solution along these lines.

src/pineko/cli/fonll.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pineko/fonll.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

If you're happy please approve this PR

@alecandido
Copy link
Member

You could merge even without approval (it's merge in a branch, not in main).

@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn merged commit fdf9a05 into num_fonll Oct 20, 2023
@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

You could merge even without approval (it's merge in a branch, not in main).

Well, I need solid arguments to convince @andreab1997 🙃

@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn deleted the num_fonll-fh-1 branch October 20, 2023 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor Refactor code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants