Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

forgejo-lts: 7.0.12 -> 7.0.13, forgejo: 10.0.0 -> 10.0.1 #380369

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

emilylange
Copy link
Member

@emilylange emilylange commented Feb 8, 2025

Forgejo Security Releases v10.0.1 and v7.0.13 (blog post)

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/releases/tag/v7.0.13
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/97f743a89e6e918f66d6297d298d0a44a21aceaa/release-notes-published/7.0.13.md
diff: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/compare/v7.0.12...v7.0.13

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/releases/tag/v10.0.1
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/97f743a89e6e918f66d6297d298d0a44a21aceaa/release-notes-published/10.0.1.md
diff: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/compare/v10.0.0...v10.0.1

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@emilylange emilylange added 1.severity: security Issues which raise a security issue, or PRs that fix one backport release-24.11 Backport PR automatically labels Feb 8, 2025
@emilylange
Copy link
Member Author

Alright, that local VM test failure was due to one of the machines being overloaded.
Should have figured.

Ready for review :)

@emilylange emilylange marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2025 13:59
Copy link
Member

@NyCodeGHG NyCodeGHG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

successfully built and tests pass on x86_64-linux

@pyrox0
Copy link
Member

pyrox0 commented Feb 8, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 380369


x86_64-linux

✅ 4 packages built:
  • forgejo
  • forgejo-lts
  • forgejo-lts.data
  • forgejo.data

@pyrox0 pyrox0 added 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two reputable people 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in the package labels Feb 8, 2025
@pyrox0
Copy link
Member

pyrox0 commented Feb 8, 2025

ran nixosTests for both regular and LTS, all worked properly. LGTM.

@adamcstephens
Copy link
Contributor

I’m away from a computer, but trust you all. :)

@adamcstephens adamcstephens merged commit 1e0f6a4 into NixOS:master Feb 8, 2025
51 checks passed
@nixpkgs-ci
Copy link
Contributor

nixpkgs-ci bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Successfully created backport PR for release-24.11:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1.severity: security Issues which raise a security issue, or PRs that fix one 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two reputable people 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in the package backport release-24.11 Backport PR automatically
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants