-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
forgejo-lts: 7.0.12 -> 7.0.13, forgejo: 10.0.0 -> 10.0.1 #380369
Conversation
Alright, that local VM test failure was due to one of the machines being overloaded. Ready for review :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
successfully built and tests pass on x86_64-linux
|
ran nixosTests for both regular and LTS, all worked properly. LGTM. |
I’m away from a computer, but trust you all. :) |
Successfully created backport PR for |
Forgejo Security Releases v10.0.1 and v7.0.13 (blog post)
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/releases/tag/v7.0.13
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/97f743a89e6e918f66d6297d298d0a44a21aceaa/release-notes-published/7.0.13.md
diff: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/compare/v7.0.12...v7.0.13
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/releases/tag/v10.0.1
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/97f743a89e6e918f66d6297d298d0a44a21aceaa/release-notes-published/10.0.1.md
diff: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/compare/v10.0.0...v10.0.1
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)