Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] repair_type: remove repair_type_id required on repair view #45

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

AlexPForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

Repair type should not be required on repair view

Copy link

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-45-by-LoisRForgeFlow-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
Signed-off-by LoisRForgeFlow
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@LoisRForgeFlow your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-45-by-LoisRForgeFlow-bump-patch.

After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red.

@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-45-by-LoisRForgeFlow-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 73e2fbc into OCA:16.0 Jun 6, 2024
9 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 2ed99f2. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow deleted the 16.0-fix-repair_type branch June 6, 2024 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants