Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rule-types: add more rules - v2 #2259

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

jufajardini
Copy link
Contributor

Previous PR: #2153

To accompany Rule types documentation.

Changes:

  • separate tests into dedicated tests (one for each rule type)
  • keep additions mainly to rules mentioned in the Rule Types doc, for now
  • make iprep list much smaller

Ticket

Redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7031

To accompany rule types documentation.
Added these separately, as they require extra config files.
As the test name still includes `rule-types`, it's still possible to
both batches of tests at once.

Related to
Task #https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7031
Add test for the app_tx rule type for the engine-analysis report to
accompany rule types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
Add tests for the app_layer rule type for the engine-analysis report to
accompany rule types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
Test protocol detection only engine-analysis tests to accompany rule
types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
Add engine-analysis tests for like_ip_only rule type, to accompany rule
types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
To accompany rule types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
To accompany rule types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
To accompany rule types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
To accompany the Rule Types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
To accompany Rule Types documentation.

Related to
Task #7031
@jufajardini
Copy link
Contributor Author

There will be a follow up work to add more rules to each of the rule types tests, but for now decided to go with a shorter version that would be easier to review to ensure we have it merged as we merge the doc.

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #2261, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tests pass These new tests should pass
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants