Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorder blockId/threadId #92

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Reorder blockId/threadId #92

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

koparasy
Copy link
Collaborator

@koparasy koparasy commented Jan 7, 2025

@ggeorgakoudis I would like to write a test, my current approach would be to have a kernel that prints out BlockDims/GridDims and we grep them.

This will not verify that the optimization is correct, but it should at least verify that we are not breaking any program assumptions.

Do you have a better idea?

@ggeorgakoudis
Copy link
Collaborator

@ggeorgakoudis I would like to write a test, my current approach would be to have a kernel that prints out BlockDims/GridDims and we grep them.

This will not verify that the optimization is correct, but it should at least verify that we are not breaking any program assumptions.

Do you have a better idea?

Sounds good, I can't think of something better.

@koparasy koparasy force-pushed the bugfix/specialize-dims branch from 4793bf4 to fc77eaf Compare January 7, 2025 21:02
@koparasy koparasy marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 21:06
@koparasy koparasy requested a review from ggeorgakoudis January 7, 2025 21:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@ggeorgakoudis ggeorgakoudis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@koparasy koparasy merged commit 9e493fc into main Jan 8, 2025
12 checks passed
@ggeorgakoudis ggeorgakoudis deleted the bugfix/specialize-dims branch January 10, 2025 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants