Please check the commit

[deeptijk]

User description

@ypriverol I have made changes to TMT channels....added all the parent labels to channels

---

PR Type

enhancement

---

Description

• Updated the pride_cv.obo file to enhance the TMT channel definitions by adding specific parent labels for different TMT plex labeling kits.
• Introduced new terms for TMT6PLEX, TMT10PLEX, TMT16PLEX, and TMT18PLEX, specifying the number of channels each kit has.
• Corrected the parent labels for existing TMT channels to reflect the appropriate plex labeling kits.
• Updated metadata including the data version and the person who saved the file.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	pride_cv.obo Enhance TMT channel definitions with specific labeling kits pride_cv.obo Updated the data version and saved-by metadata. Added new parent labels for TMT channels, specifying different plex labeling kits. Introduced new terms for TMT labeling kits with specific channel counts. Corrected and updated existing TMT channel definitions with appropriate parent labels. +86/-30

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Inconsistent Definition The term TMT16PLEX appears twice with different IDs (PRIDE:0000668 and PRIDE:0000669) but has inconsistent definitions - one states "16 channels" while the other states "18 channels" Incorrect Parent Label Some TMT channels are assigned to multiple parent labels that appear contradictory. For example, TMT126 is labeled as belonging to 6-plex, 10-plex, 16-plex and 18-plex simultaneously

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	✅ Fix inconsistent naming and definition for TMT labeling kit terms Suggestion Impact: The term TMT16PLEX was renamed to TMT18PLEX and the definition was corrected to match the 18 channels description. code diff: id: PRIDE:0000669 -name: TMT16PLEX -def: "TMT 18-plex labeling kit has 16 channels" [PRIDE:PRIDE] +name: TMT18PLEX +def: "TMT 18-plex labeling kit has 18 channels" [PRIDE:PRIDE] The term TMT16PLEX is used twice with different IDs (PRIDE:0000668 and PRIDE:0000669) but different definitions. The second instance should be renamed to TMT18PLEX to match its definition. pride_cv.obo [4056-4058] [Term] id: PRIDE:0000669 -name: TMT16PLEX -def: "TMT 18-plex labeling kit has 16 channels" [PRIDE:PRIDE] +name: TMT18PLEX +def: "TMT 18-plex labeling kit has 18 channels" [PRIDE:PRIDE] is_a: PRIDE:0000515 ! TMT Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion identifies a critical inconsistency where the same name (TMT16PLEX) is used for two different terms with different IDs and definitions, which could cause serious confusion and errors in data annotation.	9
Possible bug	✅ Correct inaccurate channel count in labeling kit definition Suggestion Impact: The suggestion corrected the name and definition of the TMT18PLEX labeling kit to accurately reflect that it has 18 channels instead of 16. code diff: id: PRIDE:0000669 -name: TMT16PLEX -def: "TMT 18-plex labeling kit has 16 channels" [PRIDE:PRIDE] +name: TMT18PLEX +def: "TMT 18-plex labeling kit has 18 channels" [PRIDE:PRIDE] The definition for TMT18PLEX states "has 16 channels" which appears incorrect since an 18-plex kit should have 18 channels. pride_cv.obo [4056-4058] id: PRIDE:0000669 -name: TMT16PLEX -def: "TMT 18-plex labeling kit has 16 channels" [PRIDE:PRIDE] +name: TMT18PLEX +def: "TMT 18-plex labeling kit has 18 channels" [PRIDE:PRIDE] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion fixes a critical data accuracy issue where the definition incorrectly states "16 channels" for an 18-plex kit, which could lead to serious misunderstandings in experimental protocols.	9

💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

[deeptijk]

@ypriverol please check