Unittests for src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx #2396
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the test cases for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.test.tsx (1)
371-376: Enhance basic component rendering test coverage.The current test only verifies the presence of the title text. Consider adding assertions for:
- User data rendering (firstName, lastName)
- Navigation menu items
- Default selected state
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.test.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint 371-520: Verify test coverage metrics against PR objectives.
To ensure we meet the 100% coverage requirement:
- Please share the current coverage report for UserSidebar.tsx
- Confirm that all methods in the component are tested
- Verify edge cases and error scenarios are covered
This will help validate that we've met the acceptance criteria from issue #2374.
✅ Verification successful
All component functionality is thoroughly tested - no coverage gaps found
After analyzing the component and its test file, I can confirm that all functionality is well covered:
-
Component rendering is tested for all states:
- Normal rendering with user data
- Empty organizations list
- With organization images
- Mobile and desktop views
-
All interactive elements are tested:
- Navigation links (Organizations, Settings, Chat)
- Button style changes on active routes
- Drawer visibility states (null, true, false)
-
The only method
handleLinkClick()is fully tested:- Mobile view behavior (width <= 820px)
- Desktop view behavior
- Called with correct parameters
-
Edge cases are covered:
- Different drawer states
- Window resize scenarios
- Translation functionality
The test coverage meets the PR objectives with comprehensive testing of all component functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any untested methods in UserSidebar.tsx
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = () => {
$$$
}' src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx
# Search for any error handling code that might need testing
rg 'catch|throw|error' src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the file exists and see its content
fd "UserSidebar.tsx" --type f
# If found, let's examine the component's structure
rg -A 5 "^(export |)const UserSidebar" --type tsx
# Look for function declarations in different formats
rg "function |const .+ = \(|const .+ = \(\) =>" --type tsx src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/
# Check test coverage by comparing test assertions with component logic
rg "test\(|it\(|describe\(" src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.test.tsx
# Look for any event handlers or callbacks that might need testing
rg "on[A-Z]|handle[A-Z]" src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx
Length of output: 1970
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the component's content to analyze its structure
cat src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx
# Let's also check the test file to see all test cases
cat src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.test.tsx
Length of output: 19258
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2396 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 98.06% 98.08% +0.02%
===========================================
Files 255 255
Lines 7223 7223
Branches 2106 2103 -3
===========================================
+ Hits 7083 7085 +2
+ Misses 130 129 -1
+ Partials 10 9 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Codecov states that there has not been an improvement in the coverage. Please review https://app.codecov.io/gh/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/pull/2396 |
|
Please make test descriptions more descriptive. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
371-541: Add test coverage for edge cases and cleanup.To achieve 100% coverage, consider adding these test scenarios:
// Test loading state test('Shows loading state while fetching data', async () => { render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} mocks={[]} delay={2000}> <UserSidebar {...props} /> </MockedProvider> ); expect(screen.getByTestId('loading-indicator')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); // Test cleanup test('Cleans up resources on unmount', async () => { const { unmount } = render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false}> <UserSidebar {...props} /> </MockedProvider> ); unmount(); // Verify any cleanup logic }); // Test network timeout test('Handles network timeout gracefully', async () => { const timeoutLink = new StaticMockLink( [], true, { timeout: 100 } ); await act(async () => { renderUserSidebar('properId', timeoutLink); await wait(150); }); expect(screen.getByText(/timeout/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); });
I have made them a little more descriptive and added a few suggestion from code rabbit. The test covers all the function and classes of the component. |
varshith257
merged commit e670a8b
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Adds unittests done for all methods, classes and functions for the UserSidebar.tsx
Issue Number:
Fixes #2374
Summary by CodeRabbit