Refactor: Adding vitest to Avatar component #2622
Conversation
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new test suite for the Changes
Possibly related issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (1)
15-33: Consider enhancing mock coverage for different auth states.The current Redux store mock only covers the unauthenticated state. Consider parameterizing the mock to support different auth states for comprehensive testing.
vi.mock('state/store', () => ({ store: { - getState: vi.fn(() => ({ + getState: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({ auth: { - user: null, + user: vi.fn(), // Allow setting different user states in tests loading: false, }, })), subscribe: vi.fn(), dispatch: vi.fn(), }, }));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (2)
1-14: LGTM! Well-structured imports and documentation.
The imports are comprehensive and the JSDoc documentation clearly explains the purpose of the test suite.
1-92: Verify test coverage against Avatar component interface.
Let's ensure all props of the Avatar component are properly tested.
✅ Verification successful
All Avatar component props are properly tested
The test file covers all essential props of the Avatar component:
-
Required props:
name(tested in both test cases)
-
Optional props:
alt(tested in both test cases)size(tested in first test case)avatarStyle(tested in second test case astestStyle)dataTestId(tested in second test case)
The tests verify both the rendering and proper prop application, including checking that the image is present in the document, the src is defined, and custom styles/data-testid are applied correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and analyze the Avatar component's interface
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $interface {
$$$
}' src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx
# Find any additional props used in the component
ast-grep --pattern 'const Avatar = ({ $props }: $interface)' src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the Avatar component's props
# First, let's see if we can find the file
fd Avatar.tsx
# Then let's examine its contents
rg -A 2 -B 2 "interface|type.*Props"
# Also look for prop destructuring in the component definition
rg -A 2 "const Avatar = \("
Length of output: 73214
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the Avatar component's implementation
cat src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx
Length of output: 1701
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2622 +/- ##
=====================================================
- Coverage 95.73% 83.75% -11.99%
=====================================================
Files 295 312 +17
Lines 7036 8118 +1082
Branches 1516 1830 +314
=====================================================
+ Hits 6736 6799 +63
- Misses 99 1180 +1081
+ Partials 201 139 -62 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@palisadoes , Can you please tell me what more can I do so that I can make this PR mergeable |
|
@Nishantsinghhhh You have to make changes in the existing test file it could be something like Please check the issue requirements and acceptance criteria |
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
…min into Avatar_Vitest
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Done @varshith257 |
varshith257
merged commit 0630cff
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
Feature/Refactoring Avatar component
Issue Number : #2492
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Screencast.from.2024-12-08.00-48-03.webm
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Migrated the testing framework to Vitest.
Updated all test files and configurations to be compatible with Vitest's syntax and features.
Summary by CodeRabbit