Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing the failure of husky pre-commit script. #2999

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

Suyash878
Copy link
Contributor

@Suyash878 Suyash878 commented Dec 28, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug Fix.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2987

Did you add tests for your changes?

Not required.

Snapshots/Videos:

None.

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

No.

Summary

Now screen and waitFor are being imported from @testing-library/dom instead of testing-library/react, And no such failure is observed.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No.

Other information

None.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated import statements in the Volunteer Management test suite for improved clarity and organization.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a minor modification to the import statements in the VolunteerManagement.test.tsx file. The changes restructure how testing library functions are imported, separating the render function from screen and waitFor. This update does not alter the test suite's functionality or logic but improves the import organization by explicitly defining the source of each imported function.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/VolunteerManagement.test.tsx Restructured import statements for testing library functions

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Resolve husky pre-commit script failures [#2987] Unable to determine direct impact on type-checking from this specific change

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Imports dancing, neat and clean,
Testing libraries now pristine!
A rabbit's hop through code so bright,
Refactoring with pure delight!
Clarity springs, imports align! 🧪


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21687ee and 40076f2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/VolunteerManagement.test.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/VolunteerManagement.test.tsx (1)

3-4: Good separation of imports from the testing libraries.

Importing screen and waitFor from @testing-library/dom and render from @testing-library/react is a valid approach and appears to resolve the pre-commit issue. It also helps clarify which functionalities come from which library module.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.93%. Comparing base (21687ee) to head (40076f2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2999       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             31.32%   88.93%   +57.61%     
=====================================================
  Files                   299      320       +21     
  Lines                  7429     8290      +861     
  Branches               1624     1813      +189     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   2327     7373     +5046     
+ Misses                 4897      692     -4205     
- Partials                205      225       +20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please exclude package-lock.json from the PR. It is not necessary.

@Suyash878
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have made the required changes.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit c9292d1 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 28, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants