-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 812
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve Code Coverage in src/components/UserPortal/CommentCard/CommentCard.tsx #3093
Improve Code Coverage in src/components/UserPortal/CommentCard/CommentCard.tsx #3093
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on improving the test coverage and error handling for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/UserPortal/CommentCard/CommentCard.tsx (2)
87-91
: Use optional chaining for safety and clarity.Instead of the series of chained conditionals, consider using optional chaining for improved readability:
- if (data && data.unlikeComment && data.unlikeComment._id) { + if (data?.unlikeComment?._id) { setLikes((likes) => likes - 1); setIsLikedByUser(false); props.handleDislikeComment(props.id); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 87-87: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
102-106
: Use optional chaining for the ‘likeComment’ checks.To keep the code consistent and more concise, you can utilize optional chaining here as well:
- if (data && data.likeComment && data.likeComment._id) { + if (data?.likeComment?._id) { setLikes((likes) => likes + 1); setIsLikedByUser(true); props.handleLikeComment(props.id); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 103-103: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/UserPortal/CommentCard/CommentCard.spec.tsx
(4 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/CommentCard/CommentCard.tsx
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/UserPortal/CommentCard/CommentCard.tsx
[error] 87-87: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 103-103: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/components/UserPortal/CommentCard/CommentCard.spec.tsx (12)
15-15
: Successful use of react-toastify for error notifications.
The import of toast
from 'react-toastify' enables clear, user-friendly error messaging. Good job adding it to the tests.
30-35
: Mocking ‘react-toastify’ is correctly implemented.
Mocking out the toast.error
function is effective for verifying calls. No issues found.
77-90
: Well-organized default props.
This defaultProps object promotes consistency in test cases, reducing code repetition.
97-100
: Clearing mocks before each test is best practice.
Resetting mocks ensures test independence and reliability. Good approach.
278-310
: Comprehensive error handling test for the like mutation.
The test correctly verifies error display and confirms that the handler is not called. Great use of toast.error
validation.
312-343
: Thorough error handling test for the unlike mutation.
Again, excellent approach to verifying both the error notification and ensuring the callback isn’t triggered.
345-384
: Success path coverage for liking a comment.
This test robustly verifies state updates, callback invocation, and UI changes under successful conditions.
386-425
: Success path coverage for unliking a comment.
Similarly robust. Ensures the handler gets the correct comment ID and the UI updates properly.
427-473
: Verification of loading states.
This test ensures visual feedback (Hourglass icon) appears while the mutation is in progress, then switches to the liked icon. Nicely done.
475-510
: Logical check for absent data from the mutation result.
The test confirms no state changes or callbacks occur when data is null, preventing UI inconsistencies.
512-553
: Ensuring no updates if ‘unlikeComment’ response is null.
This check covers an edge case where the mutation returns a null
field. Excellent thoroughness.
555-596
: Verifying no updates when ‘likeComment’ response is null.
Completes the edge-case coverage, confirming the like callback isn’t called, and likes remain unchanged. Great test completeness.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3093 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 26.39% 89.12% +62.72%
=====================================================
Files 301 322 +21
Lines 7588 8421 +833
Branches 1657 1897 +240
=====================================================
+ Hits 2003 7505 +5502
+ Misses 5454 676 -4778
- Partials 131 240 +109 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
f190f74
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Improve Code Coverage in src/components/UserPortal/CommentCard/CommentCard.tsx. #3066
Issue Number:
Fixes #3066
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
This PR Improve Code Coverage in src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSetting.tsx. Key changes include:
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests
CommentCard
component