Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved code coverage of Donate.tsx #3094

Conversation

Dhiren-Mhatre
Copy link
Contributor

@Dhiren-Mhatre Dhiren-Mhatre commented Dec 31, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Improved Code Coverage in src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.tsx

Issue Number:

Fixes #3038

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes. Added comprehensive test coverage for src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.tsx

Snapshots/Videos:

Screencast.from.2024-12-31.17-09-59.mp4

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

N/A

Summary

This PR improves code coverage for the Donate component by:

  • Adding test cases for previously uncovered code paths
  • Removing unnecessary istanbul ignore statements
  • Ensuring 100% test coverage of the component

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Other information

Code coverage increased from previous coverage to 100% for the specified component.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced donation process with improved asynchronous handling
    • Added test coverage for donation interactions
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for donation mutations
    • Refined pagination and loading state management
  • Tests

    • Expanded test suite for donation component
    • Added comprehensive test cases for user interactions and error scenarios

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on improving the test coverage and functionality of the Donate component in the UserPortal. Changes include enhancing the Donate.spec.tsx test file with comprehensive test cases that cover user interactions, pagination, error handling, and component states. In the Donate.tsx component, the donateToOrg function was updated to be asynchronous, and minor improvements were made to loading state display and pagination logic.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx Added comprehensive test cases for donation form interactions, pagination, error handling, and component states
src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.tsx Updated donateToOrg to be an async function, added data-testid to loading indicator, simplified pagination logic

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve Code Coverage [#3038]
Remove Coverage Bypass Statements
100% Test Coverage

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Donation Tests 🎯

In lines of code, we test with might,
Donations flow, both wrong and right
Async functions dance with grace,
Coverage climbs at rapid pace
Hop, hop, hooray for testing's delight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.tsx (2)

259-262: Loading indicator is well-labeled but consider more nuanced states.

Introducing a data-testid="loading-state" is helpful for testing. You may consider showing partial results or a skeleton for better UX if loading takes longer.


273-273: Consider clarifying conditional logic for row slicing.

Splitting donations via rowsPerPage > 0 ? ... : donations is functional but could be more readable. A small helper function might make the logic clearer if it expands over time.

src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx (2)

235-253: Search input test is simple yet effective.

You're verifying the field can receive user input. Potential improvement: test search result filtering if functionality is implemented.


332-351: Search button presence test looks correct.

You confirm the button remains enabled and present. As a future enhancement, verify that clicking it triggers search side effects if any exist.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6349f3f and 1541a2e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx (5 hunks)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.tsx (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (25)
src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.tsx (3)

Line range hint 128-151: Convert to async function looks good, but consider thorough validation coverage.

Using async / await in donateToOrg is a solid approach for better error handling. The numeric and range validations are comprehensive. Ensure your tests cover all branches, including boundary checks (e.g., exactly 1, exactly 10000000) and potential floating-point input.


152-152: Await the donation mutation for a safer sequence of operations.

Awaiting donate before calling refetch ensures data consistency. Good job! Verify all calls to donateToOrg are now properly awaited if needed elsewhere in the code.


Line range hint 299-303: PaginationList usage is correct; watch out for edge cases.

Passing donations.length is fine. Just ensure calling components handle 0 safely. This aligns with your test for when rowsPerPage is 0 (show all items).

src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx (22)

8-8: Importing the essential testing utilities is appropriate.

These imports allow comprehensive testing of the Donate component. Ensure you remove any unused imports if your linter flags them.


26-31: Mocking the error handler is a solid approach.

Mocking errorHandler clarifies your error test scenarios. Reuse this pattern for other modules that might need mocking.


166-167: Mocking matchMedia is good for consistent environment in tests.

This ensures your component won't break under media-related conditions. Keep an eye on potential changes if your component grows in responsive complexity.


197-213: Test for updating donation amount is thorough.

Verifying user input with fireEvent is crucial. Consider also testing boundary values (e.g., zero, negative, etc.) within the same test or separate tests if you want stricter isolation.


215-234: Test coverage for currency dropdown is comprehensive.

The click and text assertions confirm correct state updates. Good job ensuring coverage for the currency switch logic.


255-271: Pagination list rendering test ensures the table structure is present.

Confirm additional behaviors (prev/next page clicks) are also tested in other blocks. This test alone is a good starting point.


272-291: Row changes test for pagination is detailed.

This accurately verifies that changing rows per page updates the UI. Good coverage for user-driven pagination events.


292-331: Verifying the correct number of cards on each page is essential.

Checking that only 5 donation cards render by default is an important coverage scenario. Well done.


352-370: Verification of initial donation form elements is strong.

Ensuring the correct default states for selected currency, input values, and the donate button readiness is key to a robust identity check.


371-390: Loading state test confirms your spinner’s visibility.

Checking data-testid="loading-state" is a best practice for ensuring test stability. This is especially important for asynchronous data retrieval.


391-426: Empty donations test ensures a fallback message.

You validate that nothing to show renders properly. This is a good user-facing scenario often missed in coverage.


Line range hint 427-464: Currency switching tests for USD, INR, EUR are consistent.

Testing each currency carefully ensures thorough coverage and confidence that the UI updates properly for each selection.


634-658: Whitespace trimming test is a critical edge case.

Using type(screen.getByTestId('donationAmount'), ' 123 ') ensures your function handles leading/trailing spaces properly. Good catch!


660-692: Tests for null donation data confirm graceful fallback.

You confirm if donation data is null, the UI displays nothing to show. This robustly handles potential unexpected backend responses.


693-714: Zero rowsPerPage scenario tests the show-all logic.

Ensuring the UI displays all donations when rowsPerPage is zero is a nuanced scenario. Great job capturing it in a test.


715-736: Empty donation amount test for donateToOrg is thorough.

Verifying that the error toast appears covers a critical edge case. Good coverage for form validation.


737-781: Page update test ensures next-page is functional.

Clicking the “next” button and verifying the new set of donation cards underscores robust navigation coverage.


782-803: Non-numeric amount test properly triggers an error toast.

Verifying that an error appears for non-numeric input in donationAmount ensures reliability in user input handling.


805-826: Minimum donation enforcement test is correct.

Users who enter amounts below the threshold see the correct error message, fulfilling real-world validation.


828-849: Maximum donation threshold test prevents overly large amounts.

Ensuring out-of-range inputs produce a clear error adds to the trustworthiness of the donation flow.


851-901: Test coverage for donation mutation error ensures graceful failure handling.

You’ve correctly mocked the mutation error scenario. Confirm users are informed about the failure and any retry mechanisms if needed.


903-952: GraphQL error scenario test is thorough.

Similar to the previous scenario, verifying that GraphQL-level errors also trigger the error handler ensures robust resilience in distributed systems.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.17%. Comparing base (6349f3f) to head (1541a2e).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3094       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             26.39%   89.17%   +62.77%     
=====================================================
  Files                   301      322       +21     
  Lines                  7588     8422      +834     
  Branches               1657     1898      +241     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   2003     7510     +5507     
+ Misses                 5454      670     -4784     
- Partials                131      242      +111     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@beingnoble03 beingnoble03 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 5c4adf6 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 31, 2024
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants