Refactor CSS in src/components/EventStats/Statistics/AverageRating.tsx #2902 #3205

Aayushgoyal00 · 2025-01-08T09:07:36Z

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring

Issue Number:

Fixes #2902

Did you add tests for your changes?
No

Snapshots/Videos:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5882d06b-dc05-447b-9fc5-709ac1babef8

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No

Summary

-All embedded CSS in the file (talawa-admin\src\components\EventStats\Statistics\AverageRating.tsx) has been merged into the global CSS file (talawa-admin\src\style\app.module.css) using pre-existing CSS.

-All embedded CSS in this file (talawa-admin\src\components\EventStats\Statistics\AverageRating.tsx) has been removed,

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Style
- Updated styling for the Average Rating component
- Added new CSS classes for card container and rating display
- Implemented custom colors for filled and hover star ratings

… into develop

coderabbitai · 2025-01-08T09:07:44Z

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS in the AverageRating.tsx component by transitioning from inline styles to CSS module classes. The changes involve importing styles from app.module.css and replacing inline styling with predefined CSS classes for the Card and Rating components. This modification aims to improve the maintainability and consistency of styling across the application by centralizing styles in a global CSS module.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`src/components/EventStats/Statistics/AverageRating.tsx`	Replaced inline styles with CSS module classes from `styles`
`src/style/app.module.css`	Added new CSS classes: `.cardContainer` (300px width), `.ratingFilled` (#ff6d75), and `.ratingHover` (#ff3d47)

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Refactor CSS in `AverageRating.tsx` [#2902]	✅
Move embedded CSS to `src/style/app.module.css` [#2902]	✅
Remove inline CSS references [#2902]	✅

Possibly related issues

Refactor CSS in src/components/EventManagement/EventAttendance/EventStatistics.tsx #2903: Similar CSS refactoring in EventStatistics.tsx
Refactor CSS in src/components/EventStats/Statistics/Feedback.tsx #2901: CSS refactoring in Feedback.tsx
Refactor CSS in src/components/EventListCard/EventListCard.tsx #2905: CSS refactoring in EventListCard.tsx

Possibly related PRs

Refactor styles: move SubTags.module.css styles to app.module.css #2538: Refactoring styles in SubTags.module.css
refactored OrganizationDashboard css/ closes #2513 #2593: Consolidating styles for OrganizationDashboard
Refactor CSS for LeftDrawerOrg #3131: Centralizing styles in app.module.css
Refactored CSS in src/components/EventListCard #3188: Refactoring CSS in EventListCard

Suggested reviewers

rishav-jha-mech
palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to CSS Delight 🎨

Inline styles, once wild and free,
Now tamed in modules, a styling spree!
Card and Rating, neat and clean,
CSS magic, a developer's dream!
Refactored with love, pixel-perfect sight! 🌟

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f30baa5 and 1132dfe.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

src/components/EventStats/Statistics/AverageRating.tsx (3 hunks)
src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

GitHub Check: Test Application
GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)

🔇 Additional comments (4)

src/components/EventStats/Statistics/AverageRating.tsx (3)

7-7: LGTM! Clean import of CSS module.

The import statement follows best practices for CSS modules.

36-36: LGTM! Good migration from inline styles to CSS modules.

The Card component's inline width style has been properly replaced with a CSS module class.

53-55: LGTM! Proper separation of styling concerns.

The Rating component's inline styles have been correctly moved to CSS module classes, improving maintainability.

src/style/app.module.css (1)

942-952: LGTM! Well-structured CSS classes with clear purposes.

The new CSS classes are clean, focused, and well-documented:

.cardContainer: Sets a consistent width

.ratingFilled: Defines the filled star color

.ratingHover: Defines the hover state color

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

github-actions · 2025-01-08T09:08:02Z

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

comments in this PR or
our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

github-actions

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

codecov · 2025-01-08T09:19:56Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.71%. Comparing base (f30baa5) to head (c132669).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop    #3205       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    19.99%   89.71%   +69.72%     
============================================
  Files          302      323       +21     
  Lines         7687     8452      +765     
  Branches      1677     1899      +222     
============================================
+ Hits          1537     7583     +6046     
+ Misses        6054      644     -5410     
- Partials        96      225      +129

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Aayushgoyal00 added 4 commits January 8, 2025 01:18

Refactor AverageRating component styles and add CSS for rating colors

c350302

Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/Aayushgoyal00/talawa-admin…

37d6f46

… into develop

Remove duplicate 'dev' property from package-lock.json

491d5f3

Refactor AverageRating component styles and add CSS for rating colors

1132dfe

github-actions bot reviewed Jan 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

Remove license information from package-lock.json

c132669

Aayushgoyal00 dismissed coderabbitai[bot]’s stale review via c132669 January 8, 2025 10:39

Aayushgoyal00 closed this Jan 8, 2025

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Refactor CSS in src/components/EventStats/Statistics/AverageRating.tsx #2902 #3205

Refactor CSS in src/components/EventStats/Statistics/AverageRating.tsx #2902 #3205

Aayushgoyal00 commented Jan 8, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

github-actions bot left a comment

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Refactor CSS in src/components/EventStats/Statistics/AverageRating.tsx #2902 #3205

Refactor CSS in src/components/EventStats/Statistics/AverageRating.tsx #2902 #3205

Conversation

Aayushgoyal00 commented Jan 8, 2025 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025 • edited Loading

Walkthrough

Changes

Assessment against linked issues

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

Poem

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Testing Your Code

Reviewers

Reviewing Your Code

CONTRIBUTING.md

Other

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

Aayushgoyal00 commented Jan 8, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading