Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

refactor:vitest to GroupModal.tsx #3226

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025
Merged

refactor:vitest to GroupModal.tsx #3226

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

shivasankaran18
Copy link
Contributor

@shivasankaran18 shivasankaran18 commented Jan 9, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Added Vitest to src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/*

*Issue Number: 2581

Fixes #2581

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes

Snapshots/Videos:
Screenshot 2025-01-09 230654

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Migrated the testing framework to Vitest.
Updated all test files and configurations to be compatible with Vitest's syntax and features.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated testing framework from Jest to Vitest for the Group Modal test suite.
    • Migrated mock implementations to use Vitest-specific mocking syntax.
    • Added comments for clarity in test cases.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the GroupModal.spec.tsx test file from Jest to Vitest. The changes involve replacing Jest-specific mocking functions with their Vitest equivalents, specifically transitioning from jest.mock to vi.mock and from jest.fn() to vi.fn() for mocking the react-toastify library and other function properties within the test suite.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/GroupModal.spec.tsx Migrated from Jest to Vitest mocking syntax

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2581] ✅
Ensure tests pass using npm run test:vitest [#2581] ❓ Requires full test suite verification.
Maintain 100% test coverage [#2581] ❓ Requires comprehensive coverage check.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 In the realm of tests, a change takes flight,
From Jest to Vitest, we refactor with might!
Mocks transform, functions realign,
Code becomes clearer, tests now shine bright!
Hop along, testing framework so light! 🧪

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dcf53c1 and 8dd138d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/GroupModal.spec.tsx (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/GroupModal.spec.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 9, 2025
View reviewed changes
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please make a minor commit to reset the failing tests

@aadhil2k4
Copy link
Contributor

@shivasankaran18 I faced the same issue. You can resolve it by rectifying the import path of app.module.css in ForgotPassword.tsx. Add this:
import styles from '../../style/app.module.css';

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please make a minor commit. The failing test should be updated

@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Contributor Author

yeah @aadhil2k4 ..thought the same..but it has already been resolved now..thanks for your time..happy contriubuting..!

@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Contributor Author

@palisadoes ..the PR nows looks good to be merged..It has passed all the CI tests

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 9e67f35 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 10, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

@palisadoes palisadoes palisadoes approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@shivasankaran18 @palisadoes @aadhil2k4