-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 835
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#2887 Refactor CSS in src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx #3242
#2887 Refactor CSS in src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx #3242
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on refactoring CSS in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1)
Line range hint
189-196
: Improve CSS class naming and structureThe class naming and structure could be improved:
- Follow kebab-case or camelCase naming convention for CSS classes (e.g.,
tableImage
instead ofTableImage
)- Use separate classes for container and image elements to maintain better separation of concerns
- <div className={styles.TableImage}> + <div className={styles.tableImageContainer}> <Avatar key={_id + '1'} containerStyle={styles.imageContainer} - avatarStyle={styles.TableImage} + avatarStyle={styles.tableImage} name={firstName + ' ' + lastName} alt={firstName + ' ' + lastName} /> </div>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx
(2 hunks)src/style/app.module.css
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/style/app.module.css
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1)
390-390
: LGTM! Well-structured button layoutThe button container layout is well-organized using flex layout and consistent spacing.
9aa2d1c
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactor
Issue Number:
Fixes #2887
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
This PR fixes styling issues in src/style/app.module.css, addressing avatar image overflow and improving button alignment for a more consistent UI.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
.createButton
class margins in application styles