BugFix : Fixed Improper Handling for Non-Numeric Values in Allotted hours section of Create Action item modal #3379
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a validation mechanism for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
449-463: Extract duplicated allotted hours input field into a reusable component.The allotted hours input field is duplicated in two places with identical logic. Consider extracting it into a reusable component to maintain DRY principles and ensure consistent validation.
// Suggested new component: AllottedHoursInput.tsx interface AllottedHoursInputProps { value: number | null; onChange: (value: number | null) => void; className?: string; } const AllottedHoursInput: React.FC<AllottedHoursInputProps> = ({ value, onChange, className, }) => { const { t } = useTranslation('translation', { keyPrefix: 'organizationActionItems', }); return ( <FormControl> <TextField label={t('allottedHours')} variant="outlined" className={className} value={value ?? ''} onChange={(e) => { const numValue = e.target.value === '' ? null : Number(e.target.value); onChange(numValue !== null && !Number.isNaN(numValue) && numValue >= 0 ? numValue : null); }} /> </FormControl> ); };Also, improve the validation in the onChange handler by:
- Using
Number()instead ofparseInt()for consistent number parsing- Ensuring consistent null handling with the
handleFormChangevalidation-onChange={(e) => - handleFormChange( - 'allottedHours', - e.target.value === '' || parseInt(e.target.value) < 0 - ? null - : parseInt(e.target.value), - ) -} +onChange={(e) => { + const numValue = e.target.value === '' ? null : Number(e.target.value); + handleFormChange( + 'allottedHours', + numValue !== null && !Number.isNaN(numValue) && numValue >= 0 ? numValue : null + ); +}}Also applies to: 556-570
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 233-233: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx
[error] 233-233: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.
(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
| // Special handling for allottedHours | ||
| if (field === 'allottedHours') { | ||
| // If the value is not a valid number or is negative, set to null | ||
| const numValue = typeof value === 'string' ? Number(value) : value; | ||
| if (typeof numValue !== 'number' || isNaN(numValue) || numValue < 0) { | ||
| setFormState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [field]: null })); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the validation logic for allotted hours.
The current validation can be improved for better type safety and explicit handling:
- Replace unsafe
isNaNwithNumber.isNaNto avoid type coercion. - Make the validation more explicit and robust.
if (field === 'allottedHours') {
- // If the value is not a valid number or is negative, set to null
- const numValue = typeof value === 'string' ? Number(value) : value;
- if (typeof numValue !== 'number' || isNaN(numValue) || numValue < 0) {
+ // Convert to number and validate
+ const numValue = value === null ? null : Number(value);
+ if (numValue === null || Number.isNaN(numValue) || numValue < 0) {
setFormState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [field]: null }));
return;
}
+ // Set the validated number
+ setFormState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [field]: numValue }));
+ return;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Special handling for allottedHours | |
| if (field === 'allottedHours') { | |
| // If the value is not a valid number or is negative, set to null | |
| const numValue = typeof value === 'string' ? Number(value) : value; | |
| if (typeof numValue !== 'number' || isNaN(numValue) || numValue < 0) { | |
| setFormState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [field]: null })); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Special handling for allottedHours | |
| if (field === 'allottedHours') { | |
| // Convert to number and validate | |
| const numValue = value === null ? null : Number(value); | |
| if (numValue === null || Number.isNaN(numValue) || numValue < 0) { | |
| setFormState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [field]: null })); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| // Set the validated number | |
| setFormState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [field]: numValue })); | |
| return; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 233-233: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.
(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@yugal07 I can still see the old code in the file. The changes we discussed (using Number.isNaN and making the validation more explicit) don't appear to be implemented yet. Could you please verify if you've committed the changes? Here's what I'm seeing in the file:
// Special handling for allottedHours
if (field === 'allottedHours') {
// If the value is not a valid number or is negative, set to null
const numValue = typeof value === 'string' ? Number(value) : value;
if (
typeof numValue !== 'number' ||Let me know if you need any help with implementing the suggested changes!
🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the changes have been implemented in the file
rg -A 5 "Special handling for allottedHours" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx"
Length of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check recent git activity
git log -1 --pretty=format:"%h %s" --
git diff HEAD src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx
Length of output: 65
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It loses functionality if i add all your code. I have replaced isNaN with Number.isNaN
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@yugal07 You're absolutely right! The typeof check in the original code is important for proper form state management. Thank you for implementing the Number.isNaN change while preserving the necessary type checking functionality.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: yugal07
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3379
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-23T14:09:29.347Z
Learning: In form state management for the `allottedHours` field in `ItemModal.tsx`, it's crucial to maintain type checking using `typeof value !== 'number'` along with `Number.isNaN` to ensure proper validation of numeric values while preserving the form state integrity.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
|
@palisadoes, Sure. will make the necessary changes add the commit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
781-804: LGTM! Well-structured test case for input validation.The test effectively validates the handling of non-numeric and negative values in the allotted hours field.
Consider adding these test cases to improve coverage:
// Test valid positive number fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '5' } }); await waitFor(() => { expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('5'); }); + + // Test decimal number + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '5.5' } }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + }); + + // Test zero + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '0' } }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('0'); + }); + + // Test extremely large number + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '999999999' } }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('999999999'); + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx
|
@palisadoes, I've added the test cases and implemented Code Rabbit's suggestions. Let me know if any further adjustments are needed. |
|
Please fix the failing test |
|
@palisadoes, The tests are failing due to the presence of code coverage disable lines in the file. However, I did not add them; they were already there. |
|
…included test case for the uncovered code
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3379 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 7.95% 89.69% +81.74%
=====================================================
Files 312 335 +23
Lines 8109 8646 +537
Branches 1803 1925 +122
=====================================================
+ Hits 645 7755 +7110
+ Misses 7397 629 -6768
- Partials 67 262 +195
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx
[warning] 238-239: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx#L238-L239
Added lines #L238 - L239 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (2)
781-804: Great test coverage for allotted hours validation!The test case thoroughly verifies:
- Non-numeric input handling
- Negative value handling
- Valid positive number handling
830-839: LGTM! Test case for null date handling.The test verifies that the date input correctly resets to an empty string when a null value is provided.
| // Special handling for allottedHours | ||
| if (field === 'allottedHours') { | ||
| // If the value is not a valid number or is negative, set to null | ||
| const numValue = typeof value === 'string' ? Number(value) : value; | ||
| if ( | ||
| typeof numValue !== 'number' || | ||
| Number.isNaN(numValue) || | ||
| numValue < 0 | ||
| ) { | ||
| setFormState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [field]: null })); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Test coverage missing for allottedHours validation logic
The following test scenarios need to be added to ItemModal.spec.tsx:
- Setting allottedHours to null when input is an invalid string
- Setting allottedHours to null when input is a negative number
- Setting allottedHours to null when input is NaN
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! The validation logic for allotted hours is well-implemented.
The implementation correctly handles:
- Type validation
- NaN validation using the safer
Number.isNaN - Negative value validation
However, the lines 238-239 need test coverage. Let's verify the test coverage in the spec file:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for the validation logic
# Look for test cases that verify setting allottedHours to null
rg -A 5 "allottedHours.*null" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
Length of output: 557
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases related to allottedHours validation
echo "=== Searching for allottedHours in test descriptions ==="
rg -B 2 -A 5 "describe.*allottedHours|it.*allottedHours" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
echo -e "\n=== Searching for handleFormChange test cases ==="
rg -B 2 -A 10 "handleFormChange.*\(" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
echo -e "\n=== Looking for validation related tests ==="
rg -B 2 -A 5 "invalid|validation" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
Length of output: 2298
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 238-239: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx#L238-L239
Added lines #L238 - L239 were not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@yugal07 Thanks for adding the test cases! I see you've covered invalid string and NaN scenarios. However, could you also add a test case for negative numbers? This would ensure complete coverage of the validation logic in handleFormChange. For example:
// Test negative number
fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '-5' } });
expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('');🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases related to allottedHours validation
echo "=== Searching for allottedHours test cases ==="
rg -B 2 -A 10 "it.*allottedHours|describe.*allottedHours" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
echo -e "\n=== Checking test coverage ==="
rg -A 5 "allottedHours.*null" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
Length of output: 1291
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have added that case from line 819 to 821
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@yugal07 Perfect! I can see the test case for negative numbers has been implemented correctly. The test coverage now includes all validation scenarios: invalid strings, NaN, and negative numbers. Great work!
🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the test implementation for negative numbers
echo "=== Checking test implementation ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 -n "^819|^820|^821" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases related to allottedHours and negative values
echo "=== Searching for allottedHours test cases ==="
rg -B 5 -A 5 "allottedHours.*negative|negative.*allottedHours" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
echo -e "\n=== Searching for all allottedHours test cases ==="
rg -B 5 -A 5 "it.*allottedHours" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
Length of output: 780
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get complete implementation of the allottedHours validation test
echo "=== Getting complete test implementation ==="
rg -B 5 -A 15 "validates allottedHours edge cases" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx"
Length of output: 867
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
806-821: Consider using waitFor for consistent async testing.While the test cases cover important edge cases, consider using
waitForfor assertions to maintain consistency with other tests in the file and handle potential async state updates.- expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (1)
Learnt from: yugal07
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3379
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-23T14:09:29.505Z
Learning: In form state management for the `allottedHours` field in `ItemModal.tsx`, it's crucial to maintain type checking using `typeof value !== 'number'` along with `Number.isNaN` to ensure proper validation of numeric values while preserving the form state integrity.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx
[warning] 238-239: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx#L238-L239
Added lines #L238 - L239 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (2)
781-804: LGTM! Well-structured test cases for allotted hours validation.The test cases effectively validate the handling of invalid inputs (letters and negative values) and confirm the correct behavior for valid positive numbers.
847-856: LGTM! Clear and focused test for null date handling.The test effectively validates the resetting of the date input when a null value is provided.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (1)
229-241: LGTM! Robust validation logic for allotted hours.The implementation correctly:
- Uses type checking with
typeof- Employs
Number.isNaNfor safe NaN checking- Handles negative values appropriately
- Sets invalid values to
nullThis aligns with the learning from previous discussions about maintaining proper type checking while using
Number.isNaN.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 238-239: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx#L238-L239
Added lines #L238 - L239 were not covered by tests
|
@palisadoes, I've made the necessary changes. Let me know if anything else needs to be adjusted. Thanks! |
|
* fixed duplication of chats * removed istanbul ignore text * added error handling * added tests for createdirectchat.tsx
* login and landing ui * ui * ui2 * fixed failing test * re review * global css * testcases fix * color variables * failing test
…d added prettier formatting (re-open PalisadoesFoundation#3184) (PalisadoesFoundation#3229) * Fixed ESLint bugs that required ts-specific rules for js functions * Removed eslint-ignore comments and added override rule specifically for the target file * Changed the file to typescript file and added return types to avoid linting errors * adding npx to run the tsx command * coderabbit suggestions and ignore codeconv for this file since it is not applicable * removed the ignore statement * Resolved merge conflicts in package.json
…and updated the import file (PalisadoesFoundation#3373) * Refactor css * Update customTableCell.tsx * Update customTableCell.tsx
…on#3383) * refactor * refactor2
…estCard.tsx``` (PalisadoesFoundation#3393) * added tests for MemberRequestCard.tsx * added try-finally handler
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (28)
src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.spec.tsx (2)
6-6: Be mindful of potential style conflicts when using a global stylesheet.
Switching from a local module CSS to a global stylesheet (app.module.css) can simplify styling but may lead to class naming collisions or unexpected overrides. Confirm that no other components use similarly named classes in ways that could lead to conflicts.
465-467: Confirm that class-based tests still align with design requirements.
While asserting.btn.btn-successis acceptable, relying solely on class names may make tests brittle if future refactors alter these class names. Consider adding a data-testid or role attribute for more robust testing of UI states.src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx (1)
132-135: Add error handling for the refetch operation.While the inline function properly triggers
attendeesRefetch(), consider handling any potential errors (e.g., network failure). This would provide better user feedback and ensure the UI remains consistent in the event of a refetch failure.Possible approach using Promise APIs:
-reloadMembers={() => { - attendeesRefetch(); -}} +reloadMembers={() => { + attendeesRefetch() + .then(() => { + // Optional: Provide success feedback if needed + }) + .catch((err) => { + // Provide error feedback to the user, e.g., with toast + }); +}}src/assets/css/app.css (2)
3256-3260: Improve browser compatibility for autofill styling.The current implementation only handles WebKit browsers. Consider adding vendor prefixes and equivalent rules for other browsers.
Apply this diff to improve cross-browser compatibility:
input:-webkit-autofill { background-color: white !important; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0px 1000px white inset !important; -webkit-text-fill-color: initial !important; } + +/* Firefox */ +input:-moz-autofill { + background-color: white !important; + box-shadow: 0 0 0px 1000px white inset !important; +} + +/* Edge */ +input:-ms-autofill { + background-color: white !important; + box-shadow: 0 0 0px 1000px white inset !important; +} + +/* Standard */ +input:autofill { + background-color: white !important; + box-shadow: 0 0 0px 1000px white inset !important; +}
Line range hint
1-3500: Consider modularizing the CSS architecture.The current approach of having all styles in a single large file could impact maintainability and performance. Consider:
- Splitting Bootstrap and custom styles into separate files
- Using CSS modules or a CSS-in-JS solution for component-specific styles
- Implementing a build process to optimize and minify CSS
This would improve:
- Code organization and maintainability
- Build-time optimization opportunities
- Development experience with better separation of concerns
src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.tsx (1)
3-3: Nitpick: Consider renaming the component to match the file name case.
The function is namedloginPortalTogglewhile the file is namedLoginPortalToggle.tsx. In React codebases, it’s common to match file name casing with component names for consistency.src/components/ProfileDropdown/ProfileDropdown.tsx (1)
60-64: Nitpick: Consider accessibility checks for the Dropdown.
While using a custom class for styling, verify that all relevant ARIA attributes are set for better accessibility, especially since thevariant="none"might be less common.src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx (2)
67-96: Refactor Suggestion: Extract repeated button style logic.
This block uses several inline style properties and duplicates them for eachNavLink. Consider a helper function or shared component to avoid repetitive code and maintain consistency.- style={{ - backgroundColor: isActive ? 'var(--sidebar-option-bg)' : '', - fontWeight: isActive ? 'bold' : 'normal', - color: isActive - ? 'var(--sidebar-option-text-active)' - : 'var(--sidebar-option-text-inactive)', - }} + const buttonStyle = (isActive: boolean) => ({ + backgroundColor: isActive ? 'var(--sidebar-option-bg)' : '', + fontWeight: isActive ? 'bold' : 'normal', + color: isActive + ? 'var(--sidebar-option-text-active)' + : 'var(--sidebar-option-text-inactive)', + }); ... <Button variant={isActive ? 'success' : ''} - style={{ /* repeated style inline */ }} + style={buttonStyle(isActive)} ... >
97-154: Refactor Suggestion: Avoid repeated NavLink blocks.
You present nearly identical NavLinks for/usersand/communityProfile. Consider a single higher-order component or utility function to reduce duplication.src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.spec.tsx (1)
96-98: Nitpick: Improve class name checks.
Usingincludes('btn btn-success')passes if any substring matches. Consider verifying specific class presence or using test IDs to avoid brittle tests.src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx (2)
378-378: Multiple custom spacing classes.
Combiningstyles.gapandstyles.paddingYcould be replaced with a single utility or fewer classes to simplify maintenance.
387-416: Pagination and data mapping logic.
Your slicing and mapping approach is correct. Consider extracting pagination logic into a dedicated utility or hook to keep this component more maintainable.src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
883-917: Consider adding validation for maximum hours.While the form submission test is thorough, consider adding a test case for maximum allowed hours to prevent unreasonable values.
it('handles form submission with all fields changed', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[4]); // ... existing test code ... // Change allotted hours const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); - fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '10' } }); + // Test maximum allowed hours + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '999999' } }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); + }); + + // Test valid hours + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '10' } }); // ... rest of the test ... });src/style/app.module.css (4)
63-63: Consider using semantic color variable names.The variable
--davys-greyis used for text colors, but its name doesn't convey its purpose. Consider using semantic names like--text-primaryor--text-defaultto better indicate their usage.- --davys-grey: #555555; + --text-primary: #555555;Also applies to: 98-99
163-186: Improve button style organization with CSS custom properties.The button styles are scattered across multiple variables. Consider grouping them under a common namespace for better maintainability.
+ /* Button styles */ + --button: { + --button-bg-primary: var(--search-button-bg); + --button-bg-secondary: var(--createorgdropdown-button-bg); + --button-text-primary: var(--search-button-fill); + --button-border-primary: var(--search-button-border); + };
6557-6602: Consider using CSS Grid for sidebar layout.The sidebar layout uses flexbox but could benefit from CSS Grid for better control over the layout structure.
.leftDrawer { + display: grid; + grid-template-rows: auto 1fr auto; - display: flex; - flex-direction: column; }
6894-7016: Consider using CSS Grid for responsive card layouts.The organization card layout could benefit from CSS Grid for better responsive behavior.
.orgCard { + display: grid; + grid-template-columns: minmax(125px, auto) 1fr; + gap: 1rem; - display: flex; } @media (max-width: 580px) { .orgCard { + grid-template-columns: 1fr; - flex-direction: column; } }src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (2)
70-134: Refactor the try/catch blocks for clarity.
The error handling logic is good, but consider separating the conditional check from the creation logic to keep the function more readable:
- Check existing chat → handle error → return.
- Otherwise → proceed with creation.
This small structural change can simplify the flow.
if (existingChat) { errorHandler(...); return; } try { + ... }
257-266: Leverage constants for clarity.
Provide named parameters or references (e.g., userId = userDetails.user._id) to clarify the argument list. Avoid passing too many anonymous parameters.-handleCreateDirectChat( - userDetails.user._id, - chats, - t, - createChat, - organizationId, - userId, - chatsListRefetch, - toggleCreateDirectChatModal, -); +const targetUserId = userDetails.user._id; +handleCreateDirectChat( + targetUserId, + chats, + t, + createChat, + organizationId, + userId, + chatsListRefetch, + toggleCreateDirectChatModal, +);src/components/MemberRequestCard/MemberRequestCard.spec.tsx (4)
47-49: Check reject membership data consistency.
The mock_id: '1'is used both for accept and reject flows. Ideally, keep them distinct if these represent different states.
54-91: Modularize complex mocks.
MOCKS2is well structured. If possible, centralize repeated mock patterns in a shared test utility to reduce duplication.
130-131: Use descriptive variable names.
link2andlink3are valid, but more descriptive names (e.g.,acceptLinkMock,rejectLinkMock) improve clarity.
273-298: Reuse acceptance approach.
The approach for rejecting membership and reloading after a 2-second delay is consistent. Consider extracting the shared reload logic into a helper function.src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.spec.tsx (2)
4009-4009: Use consistent test naming convention.This test block, like the previous one, renders
<ChatComp />, confirming new direct chat creation. The approach is consistent, though consider naming the test method more explicitly to differentiate it from other blocks.
4148-4196: Add UI-level error handling checks in test.The test confirms that a thrown error halts further actions. Optionally, verify if any user-facing error message or logging occurs to improve confidence in error handling logic.
scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.ts (3)
16-19: Refine repetitive error handling.
Consider extracting this error logging pattern into a small helper to adhere to DRY principles.function handleFileError(file: string, error: unknown): void { console.error(`Error reading file ${file}:`, error instanceof Error ? error.message : error); } -console.error( - `Error reading file ${file}:`, - error instanceof Error ? error.message : error, -); +handleFileError(file, error);
36-39: Apply DRY to error handling blocks.
Similar to lines 16-19, unify the log logic in a helper function.
81-84: Repeated error handling pattern.
Again, consider a shared utility rather than inlining.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
public/images/svg/angleRight.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (45)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(2 hunks).lintstagedrc.json(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer/functions/default.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer/interfaces/InterfaceLeftDrawerProps.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen/functions/default.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat/functions/default.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat/functions/handleCreateDirectChat.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar/functions/default.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar/interfaces/InterfaceUserSidebarProps.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat/type-aliases/Chat.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations/functions/default.md(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.ts(4 hunks)src/assets/css/app.css(1 hunks)src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/MemberDetail/EventsAttendedMemberModal.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/MemberRequestCard/MemberRequestCard.spec.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/ProfileDropdown/ProfileDropdown.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/ProfileDropdown/ProfileDropdown.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.spec.tsx(5 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx(5 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/ForgotPassword/ForgotPassword.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx(5 hunks)src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx(3 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(37 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (9)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.module.css
- src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css
- src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.module.css
- src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css
- src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.module.css
- src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.module.css
- src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.module.css
- src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.module.css
- src/components/ProfileDropdown/ProfileDropdown.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (13)
- docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations/functions/default.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer/functions/default.md
- src/components/MemberDetail/EventsAttendedMemberModal.tsx
- docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar/functions/default.md
- src/components/MemberDetail/customTableCell.tsx
- docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat/functions/default.md
- src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx
- src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx
- docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat/functions/handleCreateDirectChat.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer/interfaces/InterfaceLeftDrawerProps.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar/interfaces/InterfaceUserSidebarProps.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen/functions/default.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat/type-aliases/Chat.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.ts (1)
Learnt from: MayankJha014
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2612
File: scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.js:10-18
Timestamp: 2024-12-07T14:25:09.928Z
Learning: TypeScript type annotations should not be added to JavaScript (`.js`) files in this project. Type annotations can only be used in TypeScript (`.ts` or `.tsx`) files.
🔇 Additional comments (58)
src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx (1)
10-10: Use of centralized CSS module is consistent with project style organization.The updated import from
../../style/app.module.cssaligns with the consolidated approach seen across the codebase. No issues found with this change.src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.tsx (1)
6-6: Confirm the presence of imported CSS classes in the new file.You switched the import source to
app.module.css. Please ensure that all classes referenced in this component (e.g.,opendrawer,collapseSidebarButton,pageContainer,expand,contract) exist in the new CSS module. Otherwise, you may encounter missing style definitions.✅ Verification successful
All required CSS classes are present in app.module.css
The verification confirms that all CSS classes used in SuperAdminScreen.tsx (
opendrawer,collapseSidebarButton,pageContainer,expand, andcontract) are properly defined in the new CSS module.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all referenced classes exist in the newly imported app.module.css. fd app.module.css | while read cssFile; do echo "Checking $cssFile..." for class in opendrawer collapseSidebarButton pageContainer expand contract; do rg "\.$class" "$cssFile" || echo "Class '$class' not found in $cssFile" done doneLength of output: 1416
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check which CSS classes from styles are actually used in SuperAdminScreen.tsx ast-grep --pattern 'styles.$_' src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.tsxLength of output: 565
src/components/ProfileDropdown/ProfileDropdown.tsx (2)
6-6: Approved: Transition to global stylesheet.
The import from../../style/app.module.cssindicates a move toward consolidated styling, which can simplify maintainability.
56-56: Approved: Truncation logic looks correct.
The substring usage for truncating names whenfullNameexceedsMAX_NAME_LENGTHis implemented correctly.src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx (2)
11-11: Approved: ProfileDropdown import.
The provided import forProfileDropdownis straightforward and properly references the component path.
157-160: Verify test coverage for ProfileDropdown usage.
The new<ProfileDropdown />is introduced. Ensure thatLeftDrawer.spec.tsxor relevant tests validate this component’s rendering and interactions within the drawer.✅ Verification successful
ProfileDropdown component has comprehensive test coverage
The component is thoroughly tested in
ProfileDropdown.spec.tsxwith coverage for:
- Component rendering and user information display
- Role-based rendering (User/Admin/SuperAdmin)
- Interaction handling (dropdown toggle, logout)
- Navigation behavior
- State management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Checking references to ensure ProfileDropdown usage is tested rg -A 10 'ProfileDropdown'Length of output: 22134
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.spec.tsx (1)
198-198: Duplicate Comment: Same improvement needed for class checks.
As with lines 96-98, prefer more explicit checks on class names to ensure accurate test validation.src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx (2)
2-2: Use of a global stylesheet.
Switching toapp.module.cssis consistent with the recent styling approach. Ensure that removed local CSS remains covered or is migrated properly to avoid regressions.
183-188: Improved structure for admins and members.
Displaying admins and members in separate blocks enhances readability. Good job!src/screens/ForgotPassword/ForgotPassword.tsx (3)
108-108: Minor docstring update.
Only the verb was changed; no issues noted.
166-169: Changed fill property.
Ensure--forgot-password-fillis declared and consistent across the styles to prevent unexpected rendering.
196-196: Dynamic class name.
Using${styles.login_btn}within your bootstrap classes is fine. Confirm it’s consistent with other login button elements in your codebase.src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx (4)
16-16: Adoption of global stylesheet.
Looks good. Confirm any removed local styles are still accounted for in the global stylesheet.
319-320: Toggling container class names.
Naming conventions likeexpandOrgandcontractOrgare clear. No issues noted.
323-323: New container class reference.
mainContainerOrganizationaligns with the naming scheme.
330-330: Spacing utilities.
Usinggap-4with Bootstrap’s flex utilities is straightforward for spacing.src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.tsx (2)
7-7: Global stylesheet usage.
Consistent with ongoing style refactoring. Confirm that removed local rules are carried over as needed.
115-120: Separated admin and member counts.
Splitting the counts into distinct elements clarifies the UI. Nicely done.src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (4)
754-771: LGTM! Comprehensive date validation tests.The test cases effectively validate date input handling for invalid, empty, and valid dates.
800-857: LGTM! Thorough validation tests for allotted hours.The test suite comprehensively covers:
- Non-numeric input handling
- Negative value handling
- Edge cases (NaN, undefined)
- Valid positive number acceptance
This aligns well with the PR objective of fixing improper handling of non-numeric values.
Line range hint
919-956: LGTM! Good coverage of edge cases.The tests effectively handle null date changes and modal close functionality.
Line range hint
1-956: Verify removal of istanbul ignore comments.Based on previous feedback, ensure that any
istanbul ignorecomments in the implementation file (ItemModal.tsx) have been removed and proper test coverage has been added.✅ Verification successful
No istanbul ignore comments found in implementation
The implementation file
ItemModal.tsxhas been verified and contains noistanbul ignorecomments. The component is well-tested with comprehensive coverage as demonstrated in the test file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for istanbul ignore comments in ItemModal.tsx rg -i "istanbul ignore" "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx"Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First check if the file exists if [ -f "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx" ]; then echo "File exists. Displaying content:" echo "----------------------------------------" cat "src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx" else echo "File not found at src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx" fiLength of output: 21082
src/style/app.module.css (5)
151-154: LGTM! Well-defined hover shadow effect.The hover shadow effect is well-defined using rgba values for better control over opacity.
127-128: LGTM! Clear loader border color definitions.The loader border colors are clearly defined with semantic variable names.
Line range hint
380-414: LGTM! Well-structured dropdown styles with proper hover states.The dropdown styles include proper hover states and focus management.
Line range hint
572-595: LGTM! Comprehensive search button styles with proper state management.The search button styles handle all states (hover, active, focus) appropriately.
6606-6682: LGTM! Well-structured profile dropdown with proper accessibility support.The profile dropdown includes proper focus management and ARIA support.
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (4)
4-11: Ensure consistency in imports.
It looks good that you’re explicitly importing type definitions from@apollo/client. Just confirm all imported types are actually used within this file to avoid potential clutter.
28-30: Validate type references.
Great job importingChatandTFunction. ConfirmerrorHandleris consistently handling errors across the codebase.
41-41: Prop addition forchats.
Exposingchats: Chat[];in props is beneficial for checking existing direct chats. Make sure all parent components provide valid data.
140-140: Destructure for clarity.
Addingchatsto the component props is consistent with the updated logic. Ensure all references tochatsremain in sync with the parent’s data shape.src/components/MemberRequestCard/MemberRequestCard.spec.tsx (4)
29-31: Confirm acceptance structure.
The mock result foracceptMembershipRequestis straightforward. Ensure that_id: '1'aligns with real data or test disclaimers.
208-239: Confirm realistic timing in test.
Usingawait wait(2100);might cause flaky tests if 2-second timing changes. Consider mocking time or using a deterministic approach.
241-271: Test coverage for failure scenario.
The test coverage verifying noreloadis excellent. Ensure all alternative failure modes are also covered.
300-325: Address potential synchronization concerns.
Again, the removal of the reload call on failure is validated withexpect(window.location.reload).not.toHaveBeenCalled(). Good job ensuring coverage of negative paths.src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (2)
87-87: Good shift to exported type.
ExportingChatfor reuse fosters modular design. Confirm all references totype Chatacross the codebase are updated.
335-335: Passingchatsto modal.
Providing thechatsarray ensures the modal can detect existing conversations. This is practical and consistent with the new direct chat logic.src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.spec.tsx (4)
16-17: Rename the component import if desired for clarity.The distinction between
ChatComp(component) andChat(type) is justifiable, though some projects prefer a more explicit name likeChatComponentto reduce confusion or potential symbol clashes. Otherwise, this approach looks consistent.
3955-3955: Consistent usage of the renamed component.Rendering
<ChatComp />tests the chat functionalities as intended. The test structure is comprehensive and includes user interactions such as open/close and form submissions.
4094-4146: Good coverage for existing user scenario.Your check that
createChatis not called ensures correctness. Optionally, consider verifying logs or user feedback to confirm no chat creation attempt is made in the UI.
31-33: Validate unused imports.Check if all imported symbols (
handleCreateDirectChat,TFunction,ApolloQueryResult,FetchResult) are indeed used. Remove any that are no longer necessary to keep tests clean.✅ Verification successful
All imports are actively used in the test file
handleCreateDirectChat: Called in test casesTFunction: Used for type castingFetchResult: Used in createChat mock return typeApolloQueryResult: Used in chatsListRefetch mock return type🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for lines referencing `TFunction`, `ApolloQueryResult`, or `FetchResult` within this file rg "TFunction|ApolloQueryResult|FetchResult" src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.spec.tsx -A 3Length of output: 1197
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for handleCreateDirectChat usage rg "handleCreateDirectChat" src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.spec.tsx -A 3Length of output: 485
scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.ts (13)
6-6: Good use of a type import.
Using a type-only import is clean and aligns with TypeScript best practices.
8-9: Clear type annotations for CLI arguments.
DefiningargsandscanEntireRepowith explicit types improves readability and reduces potential errors.
11-11: Explicit parameters and return types.
Specifying string inputs and boolean outputs clarifies intent.
24-24: Clear and explicit return type.
Defining the function as returningstring[]is a welcome clarity boost.
26-27: Appropriate use of ExecSyncOptionsWithStringEncoding.
This ensures consistent encoding behavior when executing shell commands.
42-42: Graceful fallback to an empty array.
This maintains function consistency if no files are found.
45-46: Consistent type declarations for collections.
Explicit string array types make the code self-documenting.
48-48: Signature clarity for checkLocalStorageUsage.
Adding(file: string): voidis helpful for understanding I/O.
57-57: *Correct file skip logic for .ts usage.
Skipping.tsaligns with the script’s new TypeScript implementation.
97-97: Helpful usage guidance.
Offering a heads-up about safer local storage alternatives is beneficial.
100-100: Clear call-to-action for custom hooks.
This secures usage standards across the codebase.
29-29: Verify file matching command.
grep ".tsx\\?$"might exclude certain TS files (e.g.,.d.ts). Confirm that you only need.tsor.tsxfiles.✅ Verification successful
The file matching command is correct
The current pattern.tsx?\$appropriately matches.tsand.tsxfiles while excluding.d.tsfiles. This is correct because declaration files (.d.ts) only contain type information and cannot contain localStorage usage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for TypeScript files that may have been skipped rg -A2 '\.d\.ts'Length of output: 496
33-33: Same approach, same concern.
Similarly, confirm thatgit diff ...plusgrepusage covers all intended cases.✅ Verification successful
The git diff command usage is appropriate and comprehensive
Thegit diff --cached --name-onlycommand is correctly implemented for checking staged files in a pre-commit context, with proper fallback togit ls-filesfor full repo scanning when needed. The command usage effectively covers all intended cases.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for references or usage to confirm coverage rg "git diff"Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash # View the complete file content echo "=== Content of check-localstorage-usage.ts ===" cat scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.ts echo -e "\n=== Searching for localStorage patterns ===" rg -i "localStorage" -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 80424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check git hooks configuration echo "=== Package.json husky configuration ===" cat package.json | grep -A 10 "\"husky\"" echo -e "\n=== Husky hooks configuration ===" find .husky -type f -not -path "*/\.*" -exec echo "=== {} ===" \; -exec cat {} \;Length of output: 1424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check lint-staged configuration echo "=== Lint staged configuration ===" cat package.json | grep -A 15 "\"lint-staged\""Length of output: 1230
.lintstagedrc.json (1)
4-4: Updated command to use tsx.
Switching from Node.js totsxis consistent with the new TypeScript approach.package.json (1)
93-93: Aligned “check-localstorage” script with TypeScript code.
Usingtsxmatches the refactor from JS to TS..github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
68-68: Consistent usage of tsx script in workflow.
Replacing Node commands withtsxkeeps the workflow synchronized.
41-41: Confirm the exclude_files list.
Review whether excluding these files from the line count is intended or if coverage might be impacted.✅ Verification successful
Exclusion list is justified and intentional
8 out of 10 files exceed the 600-line threshold, with some reaching 800-900 lines. These are complex components, data layer files, and type definitions that naturally tend to be larger.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Checking for lines in the exclude_files list across the codebase ast-grep --pattern $'src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx\nsrc/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.ts\n%'Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check existence of excluded files and count their lines for file in \ "src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx" \ "src/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.ts" \ "src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx" \ "src/GraphQl/Mutations/mutations.ts" \ "src/components/EventListCard/EventListCardModals.tsx" \ "src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts" \ "src/utils/interfaces.ts" \ "src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.tsx" \ "src/components/OrgPostCard/OrgPostCard.tsx" \ "src/components/UsersTableItem/UsersTableItem.tsx" do if [ -f "$file" ]; then echo "File exists: $file" echo "Line count: $(wc -l < "$file")" else echo "File not found: $file" fi doneLength of output: 6389
| it('should create chat if a conversation does not with the selected user', async () => { | ||
| const t = ((key: string) => { | ||
| return key; | ||
| }) as TFunction; | ||
| const createChat = vi.fn(async (): Promise<FetchResult<unknown>> => { | ||
| return { data: {} } as FetchResult<unknown>; | ||
| }); | ||
| const chatsListRefetch = vi.fn( | ||
| async (): Promise<ApolloQueryResult<unknown>> => { | ||
| return { data: {} } as ApolloQueryResult<unknown>; | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| const toggleCreateDirectChatModal = vi.fn(); | ||
| const chats: Chat[] = [ | ||
| { | ||
| _id: '1', | ||
| isGroup: false, | ||
| name: '', | ||
| image: '', | ||
| messages: [], | ||
| unseenMessagesByUsers: '{}', | ||
| users: [ | ||
| { | ||
| _id: '1', | ||
| firstName: 'Aaditya', | ||
| lastName: 'Agarwal', | ||
| email: '', | ||
| image: '', | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| _id: '3', | ||
| firstName: 'Test', | ||
| lastName: 'User', | ||
| email: '', | ||
| image: '', | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| ]; | ||
| await handleCreateDirectChat( | ||
| '2', | ||
| chats, | ||
| t, | ||
| createChat, | ||
| '1', | ||
| '1', | ||
| chatsListRefetch, | ||
| toggleCreateDirectChatModal, | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(createChat).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(chatsListRefetch).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(toggleCreateDirectChatModal).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refine test name and extend assertions.
- The test name has a minor grammatical error: "does not with the selected user" → "does not exist with the selected user."
- You might also assert the arguments passed to
createChatfor completeness (e.g., checking userIds,isGroup).
-it('should create chat if a conversation does not with the selected user', async () => {
+it('should create chat if a conversation does not exist with the selected user', async () => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('should create chat if a conversation does not with the selected user', async () => { | |
| const t = ((key: string) => { | |
| return key; | |
| }) as TFunction; | |
| const createChat = vi.fn(async (): Promise<FetchResult<unknown>> => { | |
| return { data: {} } as FetchResult<unknown>; | |
| }); | |
| const chatsListRefetch = vi.fn( | |
| async (): Promise<ApolloQueryResult<unknown>> => { | |
| return { data: {} } as ApolloQueryResult<unknown>; | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| const toggleCreateDirectChatModal = vi.fn(); | |
| const chats: Chat[] = [ | |
| { | |
| _id: '1', | |
| isGroup: false, | |
| name: '', | |
| image: '', | |
| messages: [], | |
| unseenMessagesByUsers: '{}', | |
| users: [ | |
| { | |
| _id: '1', | |
| firstName: 'Aaditya', | |
| lastName: 'Agarwal', | |
| email: '', | |
| image: '', | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| _id: '3', | |
| firstName: 'Test', | |
| lastName: 'User', | |
| email: '', | |
| image: '', | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| ]; | |
| await handleCreateDirectChat( | |
| '2', | |
| chats, | |
| t, | |
| createChat, | |
| '1', | |
| '1', | |
| chatsListRefetch, | |
| toggleCreateDirectChatModal, | |
| ); | |
| expect(createChat).toHaveBeenCalled(); | |
| expect(chatsListRefetch).toHaveBeenCalled(); | |
| expect(toggleCreateDirectChatModal).toHaveBeenCalled(); | |
| }); | |
| it('should create chat if a conversation does not exist with the selected user', async () => { | |
| const t = ((key: string) => { | |
| return key; | |
| }) as TFunction; | |
| const createChat = vi.fn(async (): Promise<FetchResult<unknown>> => { | |
| return { data: {} } as FetchResult<unknown>; | |
| }); | |
| const chatsListRefetch = vi.fn( | |
| async (): Promise<ApolloQueryResult<unknown>> => { | |
| return { data: {} } as ApolloQueryResult<unknown>; | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| const toggleCreateDirectChatModal = vi.fn(); | |
| const chats: Chat[] = [ | |
| { | |
| _id: '1', | |
| isGroup: false, | |
| name: '', | |
| image: '', | |
| messages: [], | |
| unseenMessagesByUsers: '{}', | |
| users: [ | |
| { | |
| _id: '1', | |
| firstName: 'Aaditya', | |
| lastName: 'Agarwal', | |
| email: '', | |
| image: '', | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| _id: '3', | |
| firstName: 'Test', | |
| lastName: 'User', | |
| email: '', | |
| image: '', | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| ]; | |
| await handleCreateDirectChat( | |
| '2', | |
| chats, | |
| t, | |
| createChat, | |
| '1', | |
| '1', | |
| chatsListRefetch, | |
| toggleCreateDirectChatModal, | |
| ); | |
| expect(createChat).toHaveBeenCalled(); | |
| expect(chatsListRefetch).toHaveBeenCalled(); | |
| expect(toggleCreateDirectChatModal).toHaveBeenCalled(); | |
| }); |
|
There was an issue with the head branch. When I rebased to fix conflicts, it pulled in other contributors' commits too. I'll create a new branch and open a fresh PR to fix this. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
BugFix
Issue Number:
Fixes #3368
Snapshots/Videos:
Before
kazam_a013c6a1.movie.mp4
After
kazam_a4a4jko8.movie.mp4
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
Added separate handling for allotted hours section, for non numeric values and negative values
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
ProfileDropdowncomponent in the sidebar for user profile management.