chore: Upgrade package @vitest/coverage-istanbul && fixed failing tests #3537

abbi4code · 2025-02-04T10:43:17Z

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Upgrade package @vitest/coverage-istanbul from 2.1.8 to 3.0.4
Fixed failing tests cases in src/screens/OrganizationVenues/*

Issue Number:

Fixes #3515

Snapshots/Videos:

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Upgraded underlying development and testing tools to enhance system stability and reliability.
Tests
- Refined error validations during venue operations to help deliver clearer, more consistent feedback when issues occur.

coderabbitai · 2025-02-04T10:43:25Z

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the dependency versions in the package.json file for the talawa-admin project and refines error handling tests in the OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx file. The dependency updates bump @vitest/coverage-istanbul and vitest to version ^3.0.4, while the test modifications enhance assertions by ensuring error objects include detailed properties such as message, name, and networkError.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
`package.json`	Updated dependency versions: `@vitest/coverage-istanbul` from `^2.1.5` to `^3.0.4` and `vitest` from `^2.1.5` to `^3.0.4`.
`src/screens/.../OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx`	Enhanced error handling assertions in tests to verify error objects include `message`, `name`, and an instance of `Error` for network errors in operations.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as Test Case
    participant O as Venue Operation
    participant E as Error Handler

    T->>O: Trigger fetch/delete operation
    O-->>T: Returns an error response
    T->>E: Pass structured error {message, name, networkError}

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Upgrade `@vitest/coverage-istanbul` to 3.0.4 [#3515]	✅

Possibly related issues

Upgrade multiple packages - January 2025 #3505: Involves bulk dependency updates including the upgrade of @vitest/coverage-istanbul, overlapping with this PR's dependency bump.
Refactor: src/screens/OrganizationVenues from Jest to Vitest #2563: Focuses on refactoring tests in OrganizationVenues from Jest to Vitest, which is related to the improved error handling assertions.
Upgrade packages vitest and @vitest/coverage-v8 #2097: Deals with upgrading Vitest-related dependencies; the context is similar even though the focus is on different coverage packages.

Possibly related PRs

Refactor src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2852: Updates versions of vitest and coverage tools, directly relating to the dependency changes in this PR.
Refactored & removed instances of jest in scripts #3526: Refactors tests to transition from Jest to Vitest, aligning with the updated test assertions in this PR.
Refactor: src/screens/UserPortal/People from Jest to Vitest #2766: Involves transitioning tests to Vitest with dependency updates, which closely matches the changes here.

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

palisadoes

Poem

I’m a little rabbit, hopping with delight,
Upgrading dependencies in the quiet night.
With tests refined and errors clearly told,
Our code now shines, brave and bold. 🐰✨
Together we celebrate this hop of code flight!

Happy coding in every byte!

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat

We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1183dfc and 6c56637.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

package.json (2 hunks)
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx (2 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

GitHub Check: Test Application

🔇 Additional comments (3)

src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx (2)

544-548: LGTM! Enhanced error object structure.

The error object structure is now more explicit and includes essential properties for better error handling.

605-609: LGTM! Consistent error object structure.

The error object structure matches the pattern established in the venue query error test, maintaining consistency across error handling.

package.json (1)

141-141: Verify compatibility with major version upgrade.

The upgrade from version 2.x to 3.x of vitest packages might introduce breaking changes.

Also applies to: 166-166

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

github-actions · 2025-02-04T10:43:40Z

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

comments in this PR or
our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

codecov · 2025-02-04T10:55:25Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.61%. Comparing base (1183dfc) to head (6c56637).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           develop-postgres    #3537   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage             88.61%   88.61%           
=================================================
  Files                   341      341           
  Lines                  8627     8627           
  Branches               1925     1925           
=================================================
  Hits                   7645     7645           
  Misses                  638      638           
  Partials                344      344

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

chore: upgrade vitest package

6c56637

coderabbitai bot approved these changes Feb 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

palisadoes approved these changes Feb 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

palisadoes merged commit 46dc53e into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Feb 4, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

chore: Upgrade package @vitest/coverage-istanbul && fixed failing tests #3537

chore: Upgrade package @vitest/coverage-istanbul && fixed failing tests #3537

abbi4code commented Feb 4, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

chore: Upgrade package @vitest/coverage-istanbul && fixed failing tests #3537

chore: Upgrade package @vitest/coverage-istanbul && fixed failing tests #3537

Conversation

abbi4code commented Feb 4, 2025 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025 • edited Loading

Walkthrough

Changes

Sequence Diagram(s)

Assessment against linked issues

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Suggested reviewers

Poem

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Testing Your Code

Reviewers

Reviewing Your Code

CONTRIBUTING.md

Other

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

abbi4code commented Feb 4, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading