Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: back to onboarding page #1687

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

AMIRKHANEF
Copy link
Member

@AMIRKHANEF AMIRKHANEF commented Dec 3, 2024

Close: #1686

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced functionality for the account removal process in the Forget Account modal.
    • Improved error handling and state management during account removal.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined logic for invoking actions based on the current window location.
  • Chores

    • Updated package version from 0.33.0 to 0.33.2 in the extension package.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the ForgetAccountModal component to improve its functionality and control flow. A new constant checks if the user is on the home page, affecting the behavior of the onForget callback. Additionally, the dependency tracking for this callback has been refined. The package.json and packageInfo.ts files have been updated to reflect a version increment from 0.33.0 to 0.33.2, with no other changes to their content.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/partials/ForgetAccountModal.tsx Added notOnHome constant for conditional action in onForget; updated dependencies for onForget callback; maintained error handling and state management.
packages/extension/package.json Version updated from 0.33.0 to 0.33.2.
packages/extension/src/packageInfo.ts Version updated from '0.33.0' to '0.33.2'.

Possibly related PRs

🐰 In the meadow, hopping with glee,
A modal was changed, oh what a spree!
With checks for the home, it now knows,
When to forget, as the user flows.
Version updated, all neat and bright,
Hooray for the changes, a wonderful sight! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a308fc4 and 8e1ab04.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/partials/ForgetAccountModal.tsx (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/partials/ForgetAccountModal.tsx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/partials/ForgetAccountModal.tsx (3)

38-39: Consider extracting navigation check to a custom hook

The direct use of window.location.hash makes the component harder to test. Consider extracting this logic into a custom hook like useIsHome() for better testability and reusability.

-const notOnHome = window.location.hash !== '#/';
+const notOnHome = useIsHome();

85-85: Add type safety for navigation paths

The navigation path is hardcoded and the onAction prop lacks type safety. Consider:

  1. Creating a constant for the home path
  2. Adding type safety for navigation paths
+const HOME_PATH = '/' as const;
+type NavigationPath = typeof HOME_PATH;
+
-notOnHome && onAction('/');
+notOnHome && onAction(HOME_PATH);

Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response:

Consider implementing rate limiting for password attempts

The current implementation lacks rate limiting for password attempts during account removal. While the code handles password validation and authorization cleanup properly, there's no mechanism to prevent brute force attempts.

  • The ForgetAccountModal.tsx and related components only track password errors via setIsPasswordError but don't implement attempt counting or lockout periods
  • Password validation is done synchronously without delays between attempts
  • No persistent storage of failed attempts is implemented
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 38-96: Enhance security measures for account removal

Consider implementing additional security measures:

  1. Rate limiting for password attempts
  2. Double confirmation for external accounts
  3. Clear password from memory after use

Let's verify the current security measures:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other sensitive operations in the codebase
rg -A 5 "forgetAccount|removeAuthorization" --type typescript

# Look for password handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'setPassword($value)' 

Length of output: 141


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other sensitive operations in the codebase
rg -A 5 "forgetAccount|removeAuthorization"

# Look for password handling patterns across the codebase
rg -A 5 "setPassword|password\s*=" 

# Search for any existing rate limiting implementations
rg -A 5 "rateLimit|throttle|attempts"

Length of output: 65836

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44dcb3b and a308fc4.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/partials/ForgetAccountModal.tsx (3 hunks)
  • packages/extension/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/extension/src/packageInfo.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • packages/extension/src/packageInfo.ts
  • packages/extension/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/partials/ForgetAccountModal.tsx (1)

96-96: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling and undefined checks

The callback uses account?.name but falls back to 'Unknown' in the notification message. Consider:

  1. Adding proper type guards
  2. Improving error handling with specific error types
-console.error('Error forgetting the account:', error);
+if (error instanceof Error) {
+  console.error('Error forgetting the account:', error.message);
+  notify(t('Failed to remove account: {{error}}', 
+    { replace: { error: error.message } }), 
+    'error'
+  );
+}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

@Nick-1979 Nick-1979 merged commit b13be69 into PolkaGate:main Dec 4, 2024
8 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
## [0.33.3](v0.33.2...v0.33.3) (2024-12-04)

### Bug Fixes

* back to onboarding page ([#1687](#1687)) ([b13be69](b13be69))
@AMIRKHANEF AMIRKHANEF deleted the backOnboarding branch December 5, 2024 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: don't turn back to /onboarding page
2 participants